Review on Camera Olympus SP-810 UZ by Janis Endzelins ᠌

I am going to return it to the retailer. It is not necessary for me to have an electronic "door peephole." Got pros: NO BENEFITS! I believe it was a marketing stunt using a zoom of 36 times. The zoom is present, but not to the extent that is described in the text. I have a Fujifilm camera with a 15x zoom, which is much the same thing. During the shooting, he adjusts himself by lying down next to the thing being shot. There is nothing about macro. Some cons: To achieve a satisfactory photograph requires a significant amount of effort. The majority of the photographs have a hazy quality to them. When we are filming, the sky is lighted continuously, just like on the models for 1000. For me, the Pentax for 4000 takes better shots, and Fujifilm photographs are also superior. It is obvious that fifty percent of the pixels in the image are gray when it is blown up, which leads me to believe that it does not have sixteen thousand mega pixels. As my PENTAX camera has seven thousand pixels, the power level is either three or four. works better.