Canon EOS 60D: 18MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body - Your Next Photography Companion Review

Impressions of my purchase.Different pros: Wifi connection with phone or computer Full matrix Some cons: to buy protective glass) The swivel display is missing.

Sharing my genuine user feedback.If you're buying your first DSLR and you're thinking of buying a full-frame DSLR to keep up with the trend, then the 60

I bought for 35,000 along with a lens of the new 18-135 series along with a lock, I am very satisfied, it shoots with a bang, for my money it is just super :) Its pros: Housing material Shoots well Very nimble Very easy to handle Fits well in the hand Second screen from the top With its cons: A set of software modes (portrait, landscape, etc. ) for a semi-professional camera, I think this is not necessary :)

Excellent camera Different pros: Excellent functionality, convenient and quick to change settings Has some cons: unfortunately, there is no way to adjust autofocus for an incorrectly adjusted lens

I took a second camera for 5d mark2 it turned out to be a very pleasant thing)) but above 1600 iso it’s no longer worth shooting. 1600 for noise as 3200 for 5 when you take a hefty coffin 5d - somehow you get upset right away)) and you can’ toy (in a good way) a joyful camera))

In short, if you want, take it! this is a DSLR for those who buy their first professional camera) even if you buy a regular lens at 18-55mm (I have one now), then all the photos are just great :) Pros: Quality-awesome) the screen pleases, and also the photo editor too . Its cons: it’s inconvenient to turn the wheel with the menu, you have to press the button (and there are too many buttons, I’m confused (

Got pros: Convenient control (almost all the buttons are under the right hand, the removal is moved up to the left, where it belongs) Nice workmanship. Has cons: If you look through the viewfinder, the problem is in the glass (or plastic) it is a little inconvenient to do manual focusing.

Overall, photographer (I recommend starting with her) I recommend after purchase immediately stick protective films on both screens.

Has pros: Very comfortable, nice colors, the picture is obtained with some kind of charm, I don’ it's just super. With its cons: The matrix is ​​noisy, maybe I just don’t use it that way, but sometimes it’s not very direct.

In short, if you want, take it! this is a DSLR for those who buy their first professional camera) even if you buy a regular lens at 18-55mm (I have one now), then all the photos are just great :)

They took a video for filming, initially they expected to take a video camera, photo processing is no worse than with Canona 6d.

Passed from the thousandth 1000 Quick menu, Autofocus mode detects faces! I stopped missing with a focus on f2.8, The auto-rotation of photos does not work (firmware marriage) will be eliminated over time, for me it is not critical.

A good device for amateurs, but given the price, then, in my opinion, it could be cheaper, even if it loses some of its functionality, did not even expect.

It was necessary to take a well-worn 5 RAW, but I don’t consider this a disadvantage, it’s a buy dising, though it’s not clear why a folding screen is needed with such autofocus operation. Pros: Ergonomic - moved from the 400D and got used to the controls in 2 From batteries it lives for a long time - for 2 Price. Its cons: The main gl is 50mm 1.4, even on it at ISO 100 (! ) In the bright sun, does not spin at 360 degrees, why it needs a stopper is not clear, the white balance is removed from…

There are many cons, but even with all the simplifications after 50D, with good gles and straight arms, the "masterpiece" after which he switched to FF. Pros: everyone needs it, but still) Got cons: There is no in-camera lens adjustment, design simplification after 50D, no joystick like 50 The matrix is ​​exactly the same as in previous models, which means a relatively narrow DD and a working ISO max of 1600.

I moved from a modest canon s5, so I’m glad and there’s nothing to compare with, the card is 8GB, so I can’t shoot in RAW + the computer doesn’t “run”, The lens took 18-135 (f3.5-5.6), then such a lens is perfect, of course not perfect, but when compared with my old one, so you will have to abandon the macro with this lens.

I won’t say anything about the quality of the pictures, they are at their best with basic knowledge of the basics of photography and decent lenses (although the whale one is also not bad) compare it with a full frame, I didn’t have it, and I don’t see a difference in the quality of the picture, if you don’ It makes no sense to overpay for them several thousand, receiving in return another 200-300 For reportage shooting, this device is perhaps a bit complicated, for those who have not made their

I liked the device more than the six hundredth and this is natural because it is higher class, many useful functions, improved characteristics, you won’t notice the difference compared to 600 if you want a lighter and simpler device but with the same photo quality as 60d, then it’s better to take 600 I changed the device and I don’ in fact, for their sake, I changed 600d to 60 happy with the purchase! see photos here exif

They advised to take 50D, but the difference was small, I decided to take 60 I’m quite satisfied, although of course it’s a pity for the money))) Expensive, just like a car turns out - a camera, a lens, a cleaning pencil, a bag, a filter, a flash, lens separately 4- 5.6 IS I’ll post it later (I’ll say right away that it lathers a little, I have to go to the SC to customize it)

And now the all-cons that others are shouting about: 1 What century do you live in? ! Aluminum alloy, coated with durable polycarbonate, gives the same strength, understand this at all, but why is it heavy ? ! 3 SD is no worse, SD cards, All ons are shifted to one side, When shooting video, Neither Mark nor 7 Matrix is ​​the same as the 550D You can breathe, the 7 There is no lens hood included with the lens If you bought a camera with Keith (facepalm), you don' There was a video, a…