Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Barczuk ᠌ photo
1 Level
315 Review
0 Karma

Review on Protective LensCoat LC702002BK Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II Lens Cover in Realtree Max4 by Wiktor Barczuk ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

previously used telezooms: nikon 70-300vr, nikon 55-200vr, tamron 18-270vs, canon 55-250is, canon 70-200 4l, sigma 150-500 2.8 at the present, and there are no backlashes on any of the four carcasses (40d, 50d, 7d, and 5). 1) gorgeous, even notice the difference between an 85 1.8 by 2.8 and this zoom; I even covered a very sharp 70-200 4l sometimes up to 5.6 for the sake of sharpness, and even at 5 the portraits do not look like they were shot on a macro lens; everything is sharp; however, I'm not happy with the noise of the stub when turning it on and off; however, it is, in my opinion, Aperture. 2.8 is a significant improvement over 4, not because it lowers the ISO, although this is also a crucial consideration. The 70-200 f/4L seemed to be fine for portraits when the weather was nice, but the 2.8 produces an entirely different blur. In addition to this, I shoot even indoors with the 60 mm lens, which is something I didn't do with the 70-300 (which is, by the way, outstanding for its price). If you have the possibility to take the pro. 70-200 4, take this glass; you will not be disappointed, that is for certain:)

Pros
  • 1) A barrier against dust and moisture.
Cons
  • after sigma 150-500, It has been said that fixes are superior, but if I had to choose between a set of 85 1.2 and 135 2, I would go with the 70-200. For the 70-200 2.8, I was concerned that it would have the same technical frame as the 70-200, but it did not.