Protective LensCoat LC702002BK Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II Lens Cover in Realtree Max4 Review

Glass is truly worthy, which should be in the arsenal of a photographer, given that the weight is important, and in all it will be about 5 kg. Glass is extremely worthy. (carcass plus optics plus light, and the length of the carcass with optics but without a hood will be thirty Pros listed below: - focal lengths that are fascinating and perfect for a full frame, but for a crop there will be a totally telephoto; a clear image; a quick and precise focusing system; a stabilizer that is both really

I bought it from the hands of bad users, wedding workers, Different pros: I don’ I shot at 1/30 by 200 mm and it' if at all the quality of its picture can be estimated in money Has some cons: as this lens provides unique opportunities and quality in color and shape.

Yes, and I got used to it already on the second "photo-hunt" (I'm not a huge man who is used to lifting weights - I'm a tiny guy who isn't very strong). I use a full frame 5D. Some pros: - unrealistically sharp image - quick accurate focus - an effective stabilizer (even though there is nothing to compare it to, this being my first stub, but I couldn't be happier) It doesn't clean the picture up at all Having these drawbacks: - non-linear, so to speak (I don't know what it's called) vignetting,

In general, everything is excellent, clear, and in focus; however, the price in 2022 is not reasonable; therefore, gentlemen, have some patience; there is a chance that the dollar may decline. Has some pros: Regarding them, they are chasing a lens in order to get people's attention, and it is extremely specific. Someone has said that there is nothing better than shooting different occasions (like weddings, for example). No matter what anyone says, in order to get a full-length shot of a person,

what a clever twist he gave it! - only this one is operational! all otsalnye nafig! portrait portrait portrait! Various advantages: It is quick, silent, and comfortable, and it is the best lens in its class among those that have the same focal length (even Nikon gave up on tests because it was a bit slower!) Many people write about prices; nevertheless, you probably just need to know where to buy in order to get the best deal. oh, and did I mention that it's more affordable than that and its…

We tested this lens model in contrast to its Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 predecessor. It's crucial to note that the testing was done on a tripod, and the effectiveness of the new stabilization system was not examined. The life cycle of the device ends a month after purchase: the device works, when buying a new toy, after a month of use, everything will work the same way: lenses should be washed, sadly, in jpeg, Hasselblad). Canon and Nikon are currently engaged in a production battle for cameras…

For over a decade, I've relied on the Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L USM, first with the 50D and later with the 5D Mark II and 5D Mark III, and each time I've been pleased with the results: sharp images, quick autofocus, the need for a tripod when shooting in low light, and the inability to blur the background as desired due to the lens' relatively small aperture (f/4).

Advantages: as soon as I got acquainted with this lens, I'm not a professional and I can't get 100% glasses", the control panel is even better, but nothing will help disgusting optics, it will still "soap" if I remember correctly, I bought this lens for myself in 2022 if not to get rich, - simple, because "Marks" Although I did gain some knowledge from my purchase of this lens, I find that I rarely use it due to its size and the fact that I rarely use a tripod when shooting landscapes…

Whoever is interested, I can send equally good target photos taken with this and my other Canon gear (the 5D-4 and the 5D-3, both of which have been retired so as to avoid confusion) without having to say a word. Minimal changes were made for version 3, and now the stub is at 3.5; what does this mean? I'll tell you what it means: a huge flaw in the design was fixed by hiding it less well.

Good, Got pros: The picture quality is excellent! I just didn' II, compared to other L-kami, And the hood too. Its cons: you can’ by the way, You can’t drag it around your neck for a long time,

Obviously, if this is a girl who weights 45 kg, the weight of this lens won't be an issue. You don't have to run 50 meters to take a picture of 40 people because of the wonderful lens on the street; you may take shots of everyone at once. Even with an open aperture, 2.0, I was missing shots, or I had to stop down to 2.8 to get the same results. The first time I accompanied him, Sharp, in contrast to the 135mm 2.0 they did not use this zoom because of the price =)), has suitable focal lengths…

Having bought it, I discovered that I needed modification, as well as a new backpack; as a negative, I compare the total weight of the fixes that it can replace; for a long time, he stifled the toad within himself. (I have 100, 135, and 200 out of L fixes, and I can say that this zoom practically does not lose to them, except for the picture at 135) notice any problems with either backlash (I have a gap) or autofocus on the filter, and above, I believe that he has no competitors, taking into…

previously used telezooms: nikon 70-300vr, nikon 55-200vr, tamron 18-270vs, canon 55-250is, canon 70-200 4l, sigma 150-500 2.8 at the present, and there are no backlashes on any of the four carcasses (40d, 50d, 7d, and 5). 1) gorgeous, even notice the difference between an 85 1.8 by 2.8 and this zoom; I even covered a very sharp 70-200 4l sometimes up to 5.6 for the sake of sharpness, and even at 5 the portraits do not look like they were shot on a macro lens; everything is sharp; however, I'm…

first, purchasing a Canon EF 70-200 f/4L, then upgrading to a Canon EF 70-200 f/4L IS, It really is "something" Html it is immediately noticeable that the picture is not simply "slowing down," but actually becomes almost motionless! I am not the first person to describe this glass as a "masterpiece of optical engineering." In addition, the stub is practically silent (in comparison to the Canon EF 70-200 f/4L IS), which is something that can no longer be changed.

I recommend Its pros: nice young people who know their stuff! About the lens itself: I opened the box, checked everything, everything is in perfect order, there is a guarantee! They also gave advice on how to use Some cons: I don’t advise you to go to the store by car, even in winter) Only if the forbidden parking is the second nearby, if you’re not lucky)) The very center, but within walking distance from the metro)

Of the zooms that fall into these focal lengths, For weddings, there is the 85, do not judge strictly. Some pros: You can list the advantages endlessly, my wife likes that it’s white .) but seriously, I’ at 1/30 you can shoot 200mm from your hands (if you haven’t drunk since the evening) For 4 years of service, not a single speck of dust, mote, In good light, it crawls longer, but, Really good resolution. With its cons: In a dark room at 2.8 one could put up with this, my 50L 1.2 and 35L 1.4…

The previous 70-200 4L worked well on an old crop, but on 5d2 it was not sharp enough, it constantly turned out shaking, plus I often shot video by hand, not 4 Indeed, if you try to hold the system by the carcass, It is often enough to capture two faces at different distances, After buying this lens, not bad, go broke on 2.8 IS!

This is truly Canon' f / 1.2L II at the same time, the 85 certainly draws better, but with the Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8 f/2.8L II USM is good, but the picture is still worse than on this Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 compare the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM to this Canon's other 70-200 an indispensable thing for shooting concerts, public events, graduations, Features: heavy, you can’t hold only the carcass at all, you will break the bayonet,

Super sharp, super cheeky! Big and heavy, Bokeh: a chest-deep portrait at 200 smears into the trash, but its figure and volume are not the best (for this, it is better to take 85 f / 1.2, or 135 f / 2) it didn’t seem to you) walk) - it is very convenient in this regard (70 mm you shoot full height, 200 the same frame is already up to the chest) I use it for shooting weddings, 24-105 (but this one is only for the registry office and a banquet) if an amateur is not worth it (large and heavy).

Initially, it was aimed at the premium segment, color, size, price - these are features and characteristics, work - don' There is no need to hide your failure behind subjective "shortcomings" If it’s hard for anyone, but you need to understand that so much glass, and in such a frame, cannot weigh 100 The actual size turned out to be larger than expected, but this fact did not in the least overshadow the impressions of the lens, rather, on the contrary (subjectively), for my hand, how would you