I have been wearing a watch on my hand and carrying a phone in my pocket for the past several days on purpose so that the watch can tally the steps I take around the clock. At the end of the day, the difference is almost half (6000 steps on the phone, only 3500 or 4000 on the watch)! The result indicates that the pedometer on the phone is more accurate and counts every step online, second by second. The pedometer on the watch ates the steps over time (about 1 time in 30 seconds, 1 time per minute). How are things going, comrades? In any case, there ought to be more on the arm around the clock than there is on the phone; at the very least, there shouldn't be less. Squats, twists, and lunges were all put to the test by me today, and the results were all the same. The clock thinker is running behind schedule, so it stops counting after a few seconds and starts over again. For instance, I squatted 15 times in one approach without stopping, but I only counted 4 of those times ((((when I try to squat slowly (squatted, stopped, looked at the clock, and squatted again), it counts more precisely; nevertheless, every other time it either counted or didn't count the reps. In most cases, gentlemen, the device does not provide correct feedback during practice. I'm a little disappointed. Aside from that, it is a trendy accessory that is interesting, bright, cool, and shows the time for certain!)
🕶️ GELETE Bluetooth Sunglasses: Music, Calls & Polarized Lenses for Men & Women
3 Review
🕶️ Bose Frames: Black Audio Sunglasses with Bluetooth Connectivity and Open Ear Headphones
3 Review
🕶️ Flows: Polarized Bluetooth Audio Sunglasses with Open-Ear Speakers - High Sound Quality, Long Battery Life, UVA & UVB Protection - Bruno Style (Slate Gray)
4 Review
Polarized Bluetooth Audio Sunglasses - Flows: Open-Ear Speakers, Extended Battery Life, UVA & UVB Protection, Smart Glasses for Men & Women – Bruno Style (Matte Black)
6 Review