So, I can’t call the camera bad, it performs its functions quite well, BUT I personally didn’t like the matrix at all, it’s very difficult to edit colors even in RAW and especially in “wax” video, even on the older Canon 600d model I personally liked the color reproduction much more . Further, there is a problem with noise, and there is already noise at low ISOs, but not color but light, you can call it "grain", which is why you have to reduce sharpness when importing photos from RAW, and this is especially noticeable in videos in the shadows, already at ISO200 there is little visible snow in the deep shadows. Yes, autofocus is good, especially in video, BUT the quality of the picture spoils the whole impression of the camera. And digital stabilization in the video, in my opinion, is an absolutely useless, and sometimes even harmful function, when turned on, the quality of detail deteriorates, the picture gets closer, the feeling that the camera first reads the picture from the sensor, then stabilizes it, enlarges it, and then interpolates to get 1920 * 1080, although for good it should just read the picture from different zones of the matrix, depending on the rotation of the camera. Well, the cherry on the cake is the lack of 4k video, it is clear that the company does not want competition between budget photos and budget video cameras, but competitors have long had 4k even in the budget segment. As a result, I no longer want to buy a photo / video camera from Canon.
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review
Nikon D5100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - High Resolution 16.2MP
172 Review
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review