Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Kisiel ᠌ photo
1 Level
357 Review
0 Karma

Review on Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season by Stanislaw Kisiel ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Quality of the product is at the level, I will recommend this product

This tire was purchased in the size 265/75 r16, and it was intended for use on the first version of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. Who among you is interested in standing without assistance? For vacations at the dacha and fishing outings. In general, I couldn't be happier with how the rubber turned out. My initial concern was that I wouldn't be able to navigate my way about the city due to the loudness, but it turned out that this wasn't the case. The noise level is tolerable up to 100 kilometers per hour and is not significantly higher than that of winter tires with studded tread. Mode of operation (city asphalt during the week, cottage primer on the weekends). The operation on asphalt demonstrated that the rubber performs well on a wet road. There was a period when the vehicle was driven through a puddle that was 7-10 centimeters thick and 5-10 meters wide at a speed of 90 kilometers per hour on the rear wheel drive. It would have been expected that the vehicle would hurl it around, but instead, it flew like a tank. The water is extremely effectively expelled from the contact patch. Because of the deep tread, it was not necessary to use a layer of rubber that was very thick because it could catch screws with a self-tapping diameter of up to 19 millimeters. At - 4 degrees, the pavement is still manageable. Up to 70 miles per hour (110 kilometers per hour), there is still nothing; but, after that, you will begin to catch a car. Despite the fact that the speed index can go up to 160 kilometers per hour, it is most assuredly not designed for such mobility. After switching to these tires from the previous set of road tires, I have not observed an increase in fuel consumption, and if there is one, it is within 0.5 to 1 liter. Although the rubber is relatively soft, the amount of wear that occurred over the course of the season was approximately 3-4 millimeters. It is not recommended that you use tires on asphalt in the winter since the rubber is not designed to be used on winter asphalt. When it hit an icy patch, the U-turn on the racetrack created an unpleasant situation for everyone involved. When placed on the ground, the tires displayed a reading of 5+. When the rubber is struck in a rut, it very simply crawls out of it, and strong side hooks assist with this. On a broken dirt road, it rows no worse than the BF Goodrich KM2, the only exception being on clay, where it does not wash out rapidly, but side emissions do not aid wash out. Even with only rear-wheel drive, it handles the loose snow with a high level of confidence. The conclusion is that the price is appropriately reflected in the value of the rubber. Rubber is not for the city; if you take it, the operation on the ground should be at least sixty percent of what you do with it; otherwise, there is no purpose in taking it. Driving on cold asphalt is not an intelligent thing to do in my opinion. For Gov., and the quality of the tires is outstanding.

Pros
  • On pavement, it is audible to a moderate degree and is impenetrable by self-tapping screws up to 19 millimeters in diameter. - Completely justifies the MT quality it possesses When driving on flooded roads, this product does an excellent job of removing water from the contact patch. - Pretty soft.
Cons
  • -Extremely cumbersome; -degrades rapidly on paved surfaces. (3-4 mm every season) when more than 70% of the time spent running the vehicle was spent driving on asphalt.