Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
kumho road venture m/t kl71 215/75 r15 106q all season logo

Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season Review

11

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.4
Industrial and Scientific, 📦 Packaging & Shipping Supplies, 📦 Carton Sealing Tape, 📦 Packaging & Shipping Supplies

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(9)
img 1 attached to Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season
img 2 attached to Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season
img 3 attached to Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season
img 4 attached to Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season

Description of Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 215/75 R15 106Q all season

Extreme tire type MUD TERRAIN. Improved performance for use on paved roads. Tread design with elements to prevent stones from getting stuck and self-cleaning from clay.

Reviews

Global ratings 11
  • 5
    6
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

Rests on a Patriot tire with a diameter of 285/75 R16. Good tires for people who bike and drive frequently, but who did not jeep head even before Simeks, boggers, or fbels. It is not a good idea for an expeditionary because it will become useless in a short amount of time. At most, a handful of seasons' worth of time. Additionally, it is important to be aware of the fact that it is directional, and as a result, there will be difficulties using a standard spare wheel. This is something that…

Pros
  • If you use your head, you can etch the soft, somewhat strong sidewall up to 1. There won't be any negative consequences. In clay soils, self-cleaning performs significantly better than both Goodrich MT and Cooper STT. Effectively breaks out of the cycle. On asphalt, the noise level at speeds up to 110 is nearly undetectable.
Cons
  • Despite this, it was designed to be used on dirt; if the vehicle will be traveling 70% or more of the time on asphalt, then it is best to carry a Cooper or Goodrich tire because they are less likely to wear out and provide more ateshny =)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A reliable product, quality is acceptable.

The second MT rubber, which is installed on my MPS2, what I want to say is that this rubber is not for long trips because it is heavy, fuel consumption increases significantly, it seemed to me hard on it, when compared with hankuk MT noise, like in an airplane, despite the fact that I have additional Shumka, I had the HankukMT previous tire, and so it didn't make any noise at all, I drove it and the sea on the sands and to Hong KongBut other than that, everything is great, being in the mud is…

Pros
  • It paddles very well, it is pretty stable on the road, it does not feel puddles while going fast, and it walks gently along the potholes.
Cons
  • Extremely burdensome and noisy! , there is stuff from MT that can be compared,

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, not disappointed.

Maintains balance on a raised Shniva 235/75/15. I work in a variety of settings, including commuting and preparing racetracks for competition. Tires are ideal for expeditions because of their low noise levels and their ability to perform well in somewhat challenging off-road environments. But regardless of that, you really need to poison at least up to 0.8 (although it is already rather simple to remove your shoes in this location). If that is not the case, he has no interest in going, let…

Pros
  • a reasonable price, a wicked design, and peace and quiet.
Cons
  • Only rows normally if her poison level is less than 1, though.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

I installed these tires on the Hummer H3, changed to standard wheels, and found that there were no issues with the wheel arches; this rubber makes the vehicle look like a BOMB. After 265/75/16, you'll get the impression that the automobile has gotten higher. Have not yet had any contact with mud. It rows nicely in the mud, even tearing out bits of the earth:), as long as you lower it to 1.5-1.7 in the manner of "caterpillars" with dignity. The benefits of it include: Looks powerful The defender

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

-Stood on a 215/75R15 Subaru Forester 2022MY, and while the fender liner does rub a little, it does pass under the rack cups without any issues. Pros: Superb in the muck There is less load on the rear tires, so they rise during braking, causing uneven tread wear; I didn't want to lose control of the vehicle, so I didn't chuck it from back to front. -Wear-resistant, passed 83,000 on asphalt in 5 seasons; very rarely went off-road; I think I would have gone another 10-20 thousand if everything…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

It is supported by the Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215, with the steering wheel completely unscrewed to the side in the arches wipers), and it is in its standard position. Traveled approximately 35,000 to 40,000 kilometers across all four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it were not for the faulty alignment (it was in excellent condition, but because of the incorrect alignment, it was demolished in a week). It is nearly impossible to get in my size, and at the time that I purchased it,

Pros
  • It cleans up nicely, jumps out of the rut (and also hops onto the curbs just as well if you rub yourself sideways))), and is soft. It rows excellently (mud, sand, and puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a respectable speed, just like a country road with a fair amount of dust. Puddles are not felt. Just like a country road.
Cons
  • It is difficult to drive for long distances, then there is a buzzing in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. When traveling at speeds more than 80 miles per hour, the vehicle begins to create a perceptible noise, it becomes difficult to drive for long distances, and then there is a buzzing in the ears. The car has a bouncy ride when the brakes are applied heavily.)))) (for the very first time, something caught me off guard and surprised me). Although the only thing I can relate it to is the highway, it's heavy.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, I'm glad I found this product.

I work in the car (field) and also take part in rides; the rubber is really nefarious; rowing it would be unthinkable; it shoots out flawlessly from the wheel; nonetheless, it still won't be reduced to 1-0.7 ATM; instead, I ride in the mud at 2.0 ATM. It made me quite happy. The tire size is 205 x 80 R16, which is the regular size for the vehicle. However, I lifted the rear with a +40 mm spacer and inserted amora from the UAZ 3151 since otherwise, three passengers in the back might occasionally

Pros
  • It does a good job cleaning, is powerful yet kind, and is as quiet as for me.
Cons
  • It is difficult to roll a lot on asphalt; 13,000 kilometers of run in front wiped 10% of the rear like new; however, the weight distribution is not important here because we are in the field.

This tire was purchased in the size 265/75 r16, and it was intended for use on the first version of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. Who among you is interested in standing without assistance? For vacations at the dacha and fishing outings. In general, I couldn't be happier with how the rubber turned out. My initial concern was that I wouldn't be able to navigate my way about the city due to the loudness, but it turned out that this wasn't the case. The noise level is tolerable up to 100 kilometers

Pros
  • On pavement, it is audible to a moderate degree and is impenetrable by self-tapping screws up to 19 millimeters in diameter. - Completely justifies the MT quality it possesses When driving on flooded roads, this product does an excellent job of removing water from the contact patch. - Pretty soft.
Cons
  • -Extremely cumbersome; -degrades rapidly on paved surfaces. (3-4 mm every season) when more than 70% of the time spent running the vehicle was spent driving on asphalt.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not perfect quality, there is a small defect.

Because I'm not interested in this and can't recall how the car operated with highway tires, I won't discuss how the car operated on asphalt or how much fuel it consumed. Since I only use the car for weekend drives, I am writing for people who intend to use the tires for their intended off-road application. The typical trip distance is 200–300 km, of which 20–40 km. The remainder is asphalt, bezdora. It might ride well for certain primers, but in the genuine mud of Hong Kong and the nearby…

Pros
  • LT variant with reinforced sidewall, 2.5 years without punctures or repairs. While the new one is quiet and travels through the mud reasonably well.
Cons
  • On asphalt, a car's patency immediately sharpens and begins to generate noise (specifically in the mud, not on muddy primers).

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It functions perfectly, nothing unusual.

In April of this year, I purchased 245/75/16 for stock "Patriot" at a price that was 2 times lower (at $5,880 per bottle) than it is now. When given the option between this and BFG KM2, the decision favored KL. The main reason it is less expensive is the price. It's great for navigating mucky conditions (here, of course, comparisons are arbitrary; it's over 30 kilometers to the village on a broken road, and you can't drive at all on bald tires after rain). Naturally, it wears off quickly on…

Pros
  • One, there is a wide range of available R15 and R16 sizes. Calmness on the pavement 3 Powerful
Cons
  • 1) Easily forgotten, in contrast to the same BFG or Cooper. 2. Heavy 3.