Review on Smart bracelet Xiaomi Mi Band 3 Global, black by Ask Itthipong ᠌

I took Mi Band 2 as a replacement, which, on the run, flew out of the half-stuck holder. With that I walked, ran, tracked a dream, and did not know grief. But this version is disappointing. Mi band 3 turned out to be unsuitable for tracking a run, so I put it away and use Honor Band 4. Some pros: In total, I had four pedometers to compare - the native app on the phone (Huawei Health), Google Fit (uses the phone's sensor, but handles it differently), Honor Band 4, and this bracelet. The bracelet turned out to be the most conservative! Consistently counted 10% less than the phone and Honor Band, and slightly less than Google Fit. Excellent battery. After the first charge, the bracelet left for two weeks before asking to recharge it. Accurately counts the pulse at rest. Compared with a medical device - plus / minus 1 differed. The bracelet (in the sense, the plastic sleeve where the device is inserted) has become much stronger. The previous Mi Band 2 was lost due to the fact that the holder began to slowly unstick, and in the end the device flew out of it. Got cons: Maybe I had a defective model, but the bracelet consistently overestimated the pulse readings in motion! Compared with the Honor Band 4 bracelet and the sensor in the treadmill. Honor and the track showed a pulse around 155, and Mi Band 3 drew under 170, as if I was running in a deep anaerobic mode and my legs were about to fall off from acidification. At the same time, at rest, it shows how everything is. But it is worth starting to move, and then the readings begin to overestimate. I'm walking along the track at 6 km per hour, the pulse is less than 120, and this bracelet starts to beep - the threshold of 140 bpm has been exceeded. Well, where does it fit! Terribly considers cadence - the number of steps per minute. After jogging under the metronome, 162 bpm showed on the graph in the Mi Fit application such a saw, from 90 to 140 steps per minute. How so?!