Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Akmal ᠌ photo
From Singapore
1 Level
139 Review
222 Karma

Review on πŸ” Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box) by Akmal ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

I have been using it for more than two years, I bought a kit with 5dm2. Impressions are positive. I read reviews and noticed that they write that the stub compensates for f / 4. In part, you are right, this is true when shooting static scenes. Let's say in a normal and spacious restaurant where the first dance of the young will take place, for example, the Paradise Hall on Domodevskaya (there is a capacity of 500+ people), then you will have to turn up the ISO and shorten the shutter speed, because there will be a stir in areas where the flash is missing. 24-70 with a hole of 2.8 decides more here, but it's worth it . There is such a thing as working out a DD lens (yes, it's not only in the camera). So this is how 17-40 at f/4 is darker than 16-35 at the same f/4. So 24-105 is darker than 24-70 at the same values. In 24-105 dd, like in 17-40, they are absolutely the same, they are equally dark and draw shadows and lights in the same way. Rendering is not very important, for example, if you shoot a scene where part of the object is in the shade and the other part is lit by the sun, then you will get a complete failure both there and there. Rav will help us here, it will soften the situation, and it will be something like 24-70, but what if we make the correct Rav conversion from 24-70? 24-105 is a budget staffer, I shot a lot of weddings with it, and most often I shot indoors and in cloudy weather, when both the angle and the maximum zoom are needed. It holds backlight perfectly, it’s just that there are no complaints here, very inconspicuous HA. Acceptable distortion, it differs from 24-70, the first one is more barrel-shaped. BB does not go much blue. Tenacious AF, but not as fast in conjunction with m2, this is due to the hole, but on m3, I noticed, it focuses a little faster. Conclusion: His drawing is chic, if you take into account the price. For videographers, it is more suitable, because they shoot at 1/30 or 1/50, and this is a drawing with halftones and smoother contrast. But for a photographer, if you take high-quality photos on the street, I would not advise because of his dd.

Pros
  • Sharp, quiet, reliable, lightweight, ideal for video.
Cons
  • Working out dd, aperture ratio.