Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
black canon ef 24-105mm f/4l is ii usm lens - model 1380c002 logo

Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002 Review

78

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
img 2 attached to Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
img 3 attached to Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
img 4 attached to Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002

Details

BrandCanon
Lens TypeStandard
Compatible MountingsCanon EF
Camera Lens Description105 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length105

Description of Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002

All-new optical design with significant improvements in peripheral brightness. High-performance standard zoom lens with constant f/4L aperture and a broad angle of view covering from wide angle to mid-telephoto. Air Sphere Coating (ASC) helps to significantly reduce flare and ghosting. Diagonal Angle of View:84°00' - 23° 20'. Image Stabilizer performance at up to 4 stops* of shake correction helps capture sharp images. Lens Construction: 17 elements in 12 groups. Circular Aperture (10 blades) helps deliver beautiful, soft backgrounds.

Reviews

Global ratings 78
  • 5
    48
  • 4
    21
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

"wider! and longer!" - for those who are merely dabbling. "Not a big aperture"? 4 is the relative omission. What exactly is this? Not everyone is aware of it. "Even though there is a stabilizer available, it is strongly recommended that you do not use it." On top of another pearl! Illiterate, funny. It is up to you to decide whether or not you require this lens. It is against the rules for anyone to try before they buy. Consult the experts, won't you? There is only one response to this…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Normal quality, you can use it.

The lens has excellent contrast, good resolution and design, convenient focal lengths, which primarily "aims" it for use in reporting. Pros below: Convenient focal range for reportage shooting, excellent design, good resolution. With its cons: Distortion at some focal lengths (24-45mm), the bokeh "pattern" is not so "beautiful", even in comparison with optics one step lower.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

A very good lens. I use it with a 30D camera. There used to be kit 17-85, quite good, but L 24-105 is better. Another would be to purchase the EF 70-200 mm f / 4.0L IS USM and you will have a complete buzz.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I'm satisfied, the product is exactly as described.

came with the camera when buying the third mark. I took it and half a dozen - enough for most tasks, two years later I bought an extra wide and zoom. Its pros: Excellent workhorse. Complete with 80-200 2.8, it solves all issues related to shooting reports. Became a worker, allows you to shoot with your hands up to 1/8 second. Different cons: If we consider the lens as a reportage, then there are no shortcomings

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

The sharpness of the lens is quite ordinary, nothing special. In general, the lens captivates with its versatility, but you should not expect anything outstanding. Different pros: Convenient focal lengths, good stub, pont red stripe, motor speed. Its cons: Depending on the focal length, the amount of light remains unchanged only when the hole is open. We cover it a little and at 105 the picture is noticeably darker. For a photo, it may not matter, but for a video it is a problem. Before buying,

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The goods are normal, money is not wasted!

I used glass on a 50D crop, now I use it on 5DMK2. Non-alternative reportage lens. Sometimes you want aperture to blur the background, but miracles don’t happen . As an option - 24-70 / 2.8, but it’s short on FF, after crop I don’t even have 105 :)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

I pair it with the 70-200mm f/2.8L USM on the 7D. I debated between the options of 24-105, 15-85, and 17-40 for a while before settling on 15-85 because of his adaptability. I used the 15-85 for about two months before realizing you had to pay a price for adaptability in a photograph. I'm not saying the 15-85 is a terrible lens; rather, I was dissatisfied with the clarity at 15mm focal length and with an open aperture. If you're unsure about choosing a lens in the area of $25,000, the 24-105…

Pros
  • The "red ring" and the letter "L" on the lens speak for itself, yet even so: 1) The lenses' build quality. even at f/4 is quite crisp, and f/8 to f/16 is often superb. 2) A wide focus length range. Although there is no "barrel" effect, the image looks good on Fullframe and rather broad on the near end on Crop. Three) Stabilizer. When filming video, it performs admirably and pulls even 1/5. 4) Aperture maintained at f/4 across the whole focal range. 5) An ultrasound motor. It focuses rapidly even on inexpensive versions, like the 600D, and works flawlessly with the 7D. a mostly metal body, but not entirely, a rubber gasket on the mount, a sizable focus ring, and huge overall proportions.
Cons
  • Crop isn't particularly wide.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

The viewpoint is philosophical, languid, and unhurried. rather a portrait, still life, or interior scene. One could argue that it is not at all appropriate for landscapes. Additionally inappropriate for weddings and reports. unable to follow the movement. Speed is pointless. Despite the IS, a tripod and a steady hand are preferred. Photographs art objects, people, and studio settings well. For photographers who enjoy taking a critical look at textures, fragments, and the way light interacts…

Pros
  • Nice lens.
Cons
  • That is all standard Canon behavior.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

A fantastic lens that can be used in any situation! The most significant benefit it offers is its adaptability. When I first started using it, I used a Canon 400D, but now I use a Canon 5D mark II. The chromatic aberration of this lens is visible at a resolution of 22 megapixels, despite the fact that it was developed specifically for full frame. If you use it with a device that has a lesser resolution (like a 5D, for instance), then I don't think you'll run into this issue. In spite of the…

Pros
  • To begin, its adaptability, as it can be used in a variety of contexts. Fast ultrasonic focus. Dust- and moisture-proof (I've removed them multiple times while it was lightly raining, and nothing has been affected). For such a zoom, the image has good clarity and color reproduction. The stabilizer is excellent in every way!
Cons
  • There are not very many of them: The absence of a zoom ring lock at the initial position of 24mm (the lens falls out on its own weight, however the ring moves pretty elastically, but not tightly (as it should be)) Chromatic aberration that is quite strong when shooting full frame at 22MP resolution.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

FF's best workhorse and staff member (I utilize it starting at 5dm2). He does not, of course, "enough stars" with his aperture and pattern, but he is quite consistent in his output under a variety of circumstances, and this is highly valuable in the reportage genre. Thank you for doing this. By the way, I can still clearly recall a time when the first-generation 24-105/4 and 24-70/2.8 cameras cost only 10–12 trillion rupees (about 30 and 42 thousand, respectively) different. This, in my…

Pros
  • stable under any circumstances. The pricing is appropriate just now.
Cons
  • It captures hares with a more or less bright lighting. conventional drawings, such is the color representation

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

The lens performs quite well. When it comes to reportage, shooting is crucial. She comes seem as crisp and plastic in pictures. After trying L only once, it is now impossible for me to say no to trying it again. This is my third L-ka. A great number of people have written about the inconsistent quality. It's possible that I got lucky, but I chose to take it from the whale, and when I did so, I discovered that it was sharp from 4 and had no fronts or backs anywhere in the entire range! The…

Pros
  • Adaptability, pin-sharpness, and outstanding color reproduction are hallmarks of this lens.
Cons
  • Chromatitis, on the other hand, can be brought down by software with just one click.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I'm satisfied, the product is exactly as described.

A decent, SHARP functioning lens that can be used for the everyday shooting of a variety of scenes without any creative embellishments or twists. Does not produce soap, and focuses very rapidly and precisely. There is bokeh when using a focal length of 105, and it appears to be quite good. It is inferior than the 24-70mm lens that is already with the camera (just in my opinion). If 24-70 may be compared in the photo (also IMHO), with fixes from a hole 2.8 (not L of course), then this one still…

Pros
  • The focal length range that is requested the most for a full matrix camera. A rather crisp image throughout the entire range of focal lengths The existence of a stabilizer, because one never knows who might require it and someone always does. The ability to focus quickly and precisely is maintained in practically any environment. Not a very substantial mass at all
Cons
  • Although for a 4.0 hole and the output image, the price is not exactly adequate, it is not expensive enough to be considered excessive. The color reproduction is accurate, however the picture is not vibrant with color at all!

took place in Las Vegas in the year 2022 in conjunction with 40D. a cost savings of approximately $200 at the expense of the guarantee (canon only offers its own warranty in the year 2022, not worldwide). It was the only lens for a few of years, after which it was replaced by the 10-22, and currently it is used in conjunction with the 16-35. passed through both the fires and the seas without any problems. As soon as we landed in South Africa, the focus ring started making a faint creaking sound

Pros
  • excellent focal length considering the cost. I would even go so far as to claim that it is a fantastic universal lens for the price. the equivalent of the beginner level's workhorse in the intermediate level.
Cons
  • Yes and no, in all seriousness no. The MB is burdensome, but there is a charge for the L.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

A great zoom for all situations, including reportage, cityscapes, and landscapes. traveling eye. I converted from Nikon to Canon three years ago because of the 24-105. I have no regrets. Naturally, fixes are preferable. Canon has additional lenses for "artistic" portraits, true "macro," and professional architectural photography. "Canon" optics has roughly sixty lenses. It is a problem with straight hands, not the lens, if a traveler using a 5D-2 can only shoot with ultra-fast optics, and while

Pros
  • created with very good quality. a good zoom range. colorful "elech" shades. good clarity. Stabilizer.
Cons
  • Chrome aberrations can occasionally be seen.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

It's been in use by me for about five years. I first used film with a digital crop before switching to a 5D2. Due to the fact that there is nothing more ubiquitous, it was used for more than 90% of commercial shooting (and occasionally all 100%). Having one lens in a case is helpful for photographers who shoot fast-moving action, reportage-style, or a little bit of everything. This is the greatest option for the money. Even though there are typically other factors at play, I took the best…

Pros
  • swift, light, and precise. Failsafe. The stub actually has three steps (although there are already lenses with four and five steps). poured champagne and took a Neva bath. As though by clockwork.
Cons
  • have, of course. What did you desire, though, evaluating properly (soap in the corners, the presence of XA, etc.)? Both Distagon 21/2.8 and 135L are not this. The lens functions as planned. Rating: 5, experience: about 5 years.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but you can find a better one.

At the near end, there is good macro and sharpness. Evidently, manual mode is required for both aperture and focus while shooting with this cropped glass. The benefits over the standard whale on P + AF are not immediately apparent. When I shoot in manual mode with MF and the weather is better, I might revise the rating. Unhappy with the investment in the interim. Additionally, everyone claims that the lens is brittle and can break even while not in use.

Pros
  • L-ka. Not excessively pricey. a practical zoom range. Large, solid looking, and I love it. After then, a full frame update will be available.
Cons
  • hoped for more. I didn't see a significant difference after the whale, which is 7 times less expensive (60D). Naturally, I didn't capture the exact same pictures, but I did compare the old and new ones on a level. Everything is not particularly sharp and black at medium and maximum focus lengths.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

In actuality, there is no substitute for the Canon 24-105 lens (the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS is excluded because it covers a different focal length range), if you enjoy shooting movies and want to produce videos of respectable quality without the use of professional body kits like a steadicam, slider, etc. It is quite easy to shoot handheld while zooming in or out of the subject because to the zoom ring's comfortable grip. The lens enables you to move parallel to the focus plane to create a variety of

Pros
  • The lens has become so popular that many people still aren't even aware that it exists after an entire line of Canon cameras with the capacity to capture video were released.
Cons
  • Only one of the flaws prevents this lens from becoming a professional employee, and that is its aperture ratio.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

purchased instead of the 15-85 lens, which set me back 22k. This particular one was a 28k run. To tell you the truth, I thought I was switching out the awl for some soap, but it turned out that the difference was so significant that everyone spotted it with their own two eyes. not always a positive thing; in fact, not everyone enjoys portraiture these days because all the fine hairs on the face, all the wrinkles, and so on have become evident. The Canon 60D is the camera I use for cropping, and

Pros
  • hues, degree of clarity at f4 aperture, focal lengths, and craftsmanship
Cons
  • noisy stabilizer