Nikon 50mm f/1.8D Lens: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras! Review

This lens has already survived three cameras for me (D90, D800, now it is friends with the D850). This is just a great fifty dollars, with the best price / quality ratio for a photo. Of course, it is hardly suitable for video, but most likely, with proper skill, it may be appropriate for these tasks. The biggest disadvantage is very poor resistance to backlight, as soon as a powerful source hits the edge of the frame, then you can say goodbye to contrast. Otherwise, if you want an inexpensive…

for its price it’s very good, it’s very tenacious and works great in the open, moreover, focusing on Nikon D300 works even better than on D90, focus hits where it’s needed in 99% of cases, I definitely advise you to buy it ! photo without processing in a jeep, aperture 2.8-3.5, where the girl in a white hat is aperture 1.8, the first shot when buying in a store

The most affordable fifty dollars! Archaic in design, but gives a good picture. Lightweight and compact. It attracts with compatibility with old film cameras, but the small stroke of the focus ring, coupled with the lack of smoothness, complicates the aiming process and reduces accuracy! The same applies to cameras without a "screwdriver" - it is very difficult to focus manually. But there are no problems with auto focus. The lens is inexpensive and common! With the transition to full frame…

This cannot be ordered! Personally, mine gives a front of 5mm, but I decided that it was not scary, besides, it was the best of the 5 which is why at 2.8, for example, you need to focus with your hands, or 'wisely' or better 2 in 1 so as not to hang out.

Personal verdict on the product.Excellent picture quality, lightweight, see the point of taking f / 1.4, it is more expensive and the non-working range is from 1.4 to 2.5 .

Sharing my product review today.Has some pros: Price (bought for 3 lens hood) Aperture! Nice plastic, doesn' With its cons: For my 3 they just don' to 3 4, pretty sharp shots come out.

Impartial observations from a user.Has pros: Made in Japan, 1.8 working for portrait, with 2.2 like a razor. Different cons: No, unlike the Chinese one, which, thank God, was sold.

Pros: Great clear glass! The ability to twist the aperture ring (can be used with a converter) Its cons: There is no motor (but personally I think that this is not a drawback, almost everywhere there are motors in carcasses)

I don’t understand how you can write about focus if the lens is without a motor ? ! With my D3000, it is only manual! :)) what hands are for! I even manage to shoot butterflies without autofocus.

If you have a camera with an autofocus motor, and you want a decent picture quality for little money, as they say, with good colors, the picture is a bit aggressive, So far it makes a very positive impression. (5 kilorubles - it works out at 200%).

I bought it a month ago, got used to it for a while, now I don’t shoot with nikon D3100 compared to 18-55 heaven and earth, you don’ I am happy looking at the result.

A great way to look at the world of photography with different eyes for little money. $150 is a normal price, After the whale 18-105, quickly,

I bought to shoot a baby, in order not to write too much: I also thought that his sharpness starts from aperture 4, there is a very shallow depth of field, So, before scolding, check your camera + so fast)

Different pros: Excellent sharpness Very nice background blur Good color reproduction Lightweight and inexpensive With its cons: There are no drawbacks, except that the front lens rotates only when focusing

Pros: Very good glass! I like manual focus, mm. 1.8 with index G, that is, modern with a focusing motor, I can safely write that he was inferior in work to this (1.8 D) Got cons: I have not found it yet, well, if only something is hanging inside, but this does not affect the work with it in any way.

I bought it just a week ago, fast and accurate, at a sensitivity of 1.8, the sharpness is of course rather weak, and I am 100% satisfied with it,

Good glass for amateur photographer, suitable as a portrait lens, For an advanced amateur photographer, a must have and a step towards high-quality optics.

Different pros: makes it possible to adjust the depth of field in portrait and subject shooting, Ru/next/users/vladislav-vitalievich/album/456343/view/1445877 Its cons: For the D series, the standard: the rotation of the focus ring and a higher noise level compared to the G series.

It was purchased as a second lens for a whale 18-105, to be used on a D90, with the intention of using it for macro photography. We decided to concentrate in the full manual mode, so we bought an additional set of macro rings that did not include lenses. I have to admit, everything lived up to my wildest hopes! The background is blurred to a wadded-up uniform state, which is something I have only seen on costly macro lenses with a price that is not compatible with such a ludicrous price - 3,900

You can't take great portraits with the f/1.8G AF-S DX Nikkor lens that came with my Nikon D7000, but I figured at fifty cents I could give it a try, and if I didn't like it I could always exchange it for an 85 mm lens at a premium. f/1.8G AF-S DX Nikkor — non-motorized poltos focuses rapidly, but slowly; the open lens produces more fascinating background blur; the "spanner effect" is not something I find objectionable; rather, I see it as a strength of this glass. Forgive my 2022-ness, but…