I'll give several examples quickly: Useful suggestions welcome in the comments! Due to the autofocus capability of the Nikon D5000 kit 18-50, I used it to take and receive images of my models on a regular basis. (the most important thing is to slowly rotate the focus ring clockwise while simultaneously increasing the shutter speed by -5 stops and discarding (4)) wide enough open so there are no octagons in the picture, Watch out! When the subject is up close and the background is far away…

As the first fix, on the crop, which makes it an excellent portrait lens (examples: page=0 and /554082? page=1) Has some pros: Price, true color reproduction, amazing detail and sharpness at smaller apertures, in general, in skillful hands, Has cons: If you get a Chinese assembly (I have one), then after a while backlashes will appear, or less, bright points (for example, foliage that reflects light) There is no built-in motor, so owners of new screwdriverless carcasses (D3100, d5100) you…

Nuts in the bokeh can be observed if you strain a lot)) from it) page=2 page=2 Now I regret that I sold it, compared to 35 1.8 af-s, it draws better fifty dollars . Pros below: An excellent weight, it's definitely worth the money, there is no autofocus and stabilizer, but with such a "hole" (1.8), these alleged shortcomings fade into the background. Some cons: For such money it is better not to find, the photographer is not made by technique, but by hands and luck) IMHO 50 is too much, if

My exif is AF Nikkor 50mm f / 1.8 N, if the inscription where it is made to close is identical with the Chinese, portraits, condition, The accuracy of AF depends on the carcass, who has the back or the front - adjust the camera, the lens cannot be physically accurate, Org/image/mvz0ldmen/ Small crop Ru/photos/or/459883/3718177

Pleasant to the touch and handling lens, after acquiring the D7000, problems with focus disappeared due to the presence of a screwdriver in the device itself, Night shots are interesting, the stars from the lanterns draw beautifully: page=0 An excellent lens for the money, good portraits are obtained, excellent macro (if you take your time) gives good sharpness at a distance of up to 100 - 150 meters, it starts to blur further, but with a caveat this is noticeable at 100% magnification, for…

At first I bought a nikkor 35mm f/1.8g - it's good for everyone, but: after all - wide-angle, it slightly enlarges the head (if you shoot relatively close, of course) I’m already thinking of either changing the camera (d3000) Link to the album, at the beginning 35 goes, towards the end of 50

thousand accumulated over a couple of months, flaws, Ru/users/dr-lavrentiy/album/197485/ Ru/users/dr-lavrentiy/album/197477/

of course, it is difficult to get into focus, but the aiming indicator saves and after a couple of days it is even possible to aim at slow moving objects. ) sharpness, aperture, even lie around (18-55) 1,8 and 18-105 nikkor, and settled on a fifty dollars, and I don’t regret it at all! the difference in aperture ratio from 50mm 1,4 here are sample photos no post-processing.

In general, I think this is an excellent lens. This is complete nonsense because even minute chromatic aberrations on open apertures can only be seen when viewed at a very high magnification. The same can be said for some blurriness. A field of view (FR) that is not conventional on a crop sensor is not, of course, a limitation of the lens. If you use the matrix mode on the camera, practically all of your exposure errors will be eliminated by the processor. Focusing issues, which are almost…

I needed a cheaper alternative to a portrait lens for my crop camera, so I purchased this one. When the husband and wife want to film together but the wife wants to use the primary 1.4G camera. It does an outstanding job shooting for the price, but the price is low, and the quality is proportional to that. It's better than a "whale," but it's no match for any of your brothers. Has some pros 1. Being very light. 2. Simplified. 3. Fast. 4. Extremely crisp due to the aperture 2.2. 5. Given its low

I will not try to hide the fact that the lens was purchased for its price, which was a total of 4,000 dollars. The cost of the competitor 1.4D was 2.5 times more, while the cost of the new 1.4G was 4 times higher. Exists on the D700. I gave it a shot as a "beginning" to evaluate my future requirements, and it's possible that I won't make any adjustments to it. Perhaps, on the older 1.4D, but only because to the improved design of the newer model (less plastic). If you compare them directly, you

Budget choice fifty bucks. If there is still not enough money for more expensive quick fixed lenses, this is something I would propose doing. He is sincere in his work, and if the photographer so desires, he will even alter it after he has finished. With all of its perks. -A quick aperture -A size that makes it easy to carry around in your pocket -An excellent place for a novice photographer to begin (low price, good bokeh) The lenses included within it are positioned in such a way that it is…

Different pros: Price, weight, compactness, color reproduction, amazing sharpness from 2.2 to 22 Cons below: Scales at 1.8 (((((a sharp move, the appearance is not particularly impressive. BUT - the price, the price, gentlemen .

Has pros: 1)price 2) aperture 3) lightness 4) very sharp at f/2.5 5) compactness 6) metal bayonet 7) good assembly Has some cons XA at ​​1.8 - 2.0 lack of autofocus on younger models (I use the D3100), but for such a price this is not a drawback

I went ahead and purchased it after reading all of the reviews: Comments for novice photographers)) - if a camera without a "screwdriver" is possible, but I don't recommend it because it's difficult to catch sharpness by hand and it's annoying! but it shoots very nicely! When run through the machine, it creates quite attractive results; however, envision yourself behind the camera. generally speaking, there will be a masterpiece!) The reviews that are critical of this lens are either not…

Got pros: An excellent inexpensive sharp and very fast fix. In general, it combines many advantages for a very modest price. Some cons: There is no autofocus motor for younger modern Nikons, which is why it has to be used only in manual mode, which excludes shooting moving objects - for example, children.

Pros below: Aperture! Bokeh is no worse than helios. Compactness. Ergonomics. Metal bayonet. Cons below: Soaps at 1.8-2.0. That is, the illuminated parts of objects begin to shine, as it were. Doesn't have a motor. But this is only relevant for d40 / d60.

With its pros. Good picture quality, fast autofocus, albeit without a motor. For his money he is the best. The drawing is somewhat reminiscent of Helios. Some cons: Of the minuses, it holds back light terribly. Bokeh is beautiful only at an open aperture of 1.8 f. At all other values ​​of f, a prominent characteristic nut.

Pros below: price, aperture, wonderful bokeh, focusing, light and compact)) Got cons: 50mm is often not enough if indoors, but on the street or in nature you zoomed with your legs and you have wonderful photos)

The lens is "friendly" with any Nikon digital SLR camera that has a Nikon F mount. This means that you get exposure metering and other semi- and automatic shooting modes on both newer and older DX cameras. However, you will need to focus on younger cameras that have handles. This doesn't strike me as a very negative aspect. Working at 1.8, I would say that a lens with a search is sharp for a fifty bucks, or maybe I'm exaggerating a little bit, but it's quite possible to capture something in…