Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183) Review

I had Nikon 50 1.4D, Nikon 85 1.8G, Nikon 80-200 2.8D, Nikon 24-70 2.8G, Nikon 50-300DX, Tamron 28-75 2.8 aspherical blah blah blah, Sigma 35 Art 1.4, also used Nikon 35 1.4 N series, so there is something to compare with. This cheap, small lens, I can say for myself, is the best among all this junk that I have listed. Why? Price, I took it for 7k. Fluffy weight. Focus speed-Sonic X. Sharpness-razor, if you add a little more to the FS. I took it under the Nikon D90, after the zooms it was hard…

Shooting wide open is pointless. Normally it turns out only from 2-3 f Focus up to 5 meters misses very often. I shoot like this: I pointed it, walked away half a meter and took it off. Only so less marriage. Sharpness is average. 16-85 and 18-55 af-p shoot better. I decided that if you take a fix. It is necessary to take more expensive, so as not to be disappointed or sacrifice autofocus, but taking AF won in price. For not hastily work, that's what you need I got the impression that its…

The design of the lens is excellent: a compact and durable plastic body, a metal mount with a rubber boot. The front lens not only does not rotate, but does not move at all relative to the body. The manual focus ring is rubberized and does not rotate during autofocus. The label with the marking surprises with a huge font size - unusually :) The only thing missing is the distance scale, it is very convenient to focus blindly on it. I did not notice the problem with autofocus misses described by

I had great hopes for this lens, I bought it. As a result, it turned out that I photograph them only on the street, because. 52.5mm indoors is a bit too much and too narrow. Yes, it seems that the aperture is 1.8 and there should be a creamy bokeh, but due to the fact that this is a crop, the bokeh is no better than on modern phones. I use the lens only for shooting video, and staged photo shoots. In practice, you need a 35th normal lens. As a portrait photographer, it is suitable for indoors…

I think the lens is great, but the price is still too high and the quality to price ratio, in my opinion, causes it to lose the "people's fifty dollars" AF 50mm f/1.8D. For me, the lens is primarily an AF-S.

Some advantages: 35mm is superior to 50mm (trust me on this one), and you don't need it because you'll be shooting at 2.8. With its drawbacks: I didn't detect any deficiencies, save for a small backlash, but this may be a feature of my copy. Other than that, I didn't find any problems.

Its advantages include an aperture, a case and a lens hood that are both included, a high-quality assembly, a metal mount, and a focal length that is suitable for everyday shooting. Below are some downsides: If it can be considered a drawback at all, it would probably be the absence of a stabilizer.

With its positives being: Draws an image beautifully, washes the background pleasantly, has a comfortable focal length, is sharp from f/2.2, and you can still get a respectable frame even when you stop down to f/1.8. Got cons: Plastic mount, no stabilizer, and a small XA sensor are the only distinguishing features of these cameras.

When photographing close-ups, the subject is slightly distorted, which is one of the lens's advantages (in theory), as described in info/obzor-obyektiva-nikon-35mm-f1-8.

My firsthand product assessment.I took it as the first lens, instead of a whale, I did not regret it, there is something to compare with!

Comprehensive analysis of the item.Bought half a year ago and he still pleases, very comfortable! I recommend it as a universal fix for all occasions.

I am satisfied with the lens, the price is still inadequate, quality ratio, IMHO, loses "people's fifty dollars" AF 50mm f / 1.8D, but for me it's basically AF-S. Has pros: From aperture 2.2 sharp, from 3.5 AF mode with manual focus priority. Its cons: Strong chromatic aberration (fixed by software or some cameras) The focus ring backlashes (in most cases it is not needed).

A must have for every owner of a cropped Nikon camera! since then I have bought / sold / is as it was, and is, and I'm not going to part with it.

Pros: aperture, sharpness, optimal fixed viewing angle for crop matrix. Different cons: Autofocus sometimes misses, but it's rare, mostly everything is fine.

But! We need to be aware that this is a fix: it is only worthwhile to take it if you want to explore artistically at tiny apertures and are totally certain that this focal length is appropriate. Taking it otherwise is not recommended. Different advantages: - Sharpness, in comparison with whale 18-55 at equal apertures, details are worked out much better, microcontrast is quite good (due to better resolution), the ability to shoot in poor lighting conditions and indoors without a flash (for ISO…

Some pros: Aperture, with all that it implies in the form of a shallow depth of field. Different cons: shoot a performance or nature with the sun / reflections, water surface / just clothes with some kind of shiny little things turn into a demonstration of chrome!

Despite the vignetting, the 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Nikon lens is a good choice for a beginner or hobbyist photographer using a DX camera. The benefits of it include: - Moderately sharp, which is not terrible for portraits (especially those that are half-length). crop - approx. 52 mm) - Convenient for traveling, hiking, and other outdoor activities - Cheap. Negative aspects include chromatic aberrations in high-contrast parts of the frame, which get worse as they approach the frame's borders but…

From my point of view, With its positives being: 1. therefore, fast apertures and "bokeh" effects. Glass with a high resolution, with perhaps a f4 maximum aperture, and other similar serious lenses: Nikkor AF-S 85mm 1.8G, AF 85mm 1.4D, and is slightly less capable than the AF-S 85mm 1.4G, all of which are very compact and lightweight. Having this drawback: In all practical respects, no; the only issue is that every single one of them has a little bit of play on the focus ring; nevertheless,

A horribly small UNIVERSAL fix from the must-have category; don't hesitate to buy, it's worth your money) photo from him page=2 page=3 page=4 page=5 page=6 page=7 page=8 page=9 page=10 page=11 page=12 page= Below are some advantages: It's stupid to say it, but it's 35, which means a universal focal length - you can take a photo of virtually everything, 1.8 holes are enough, compared it with a colleague who had a 50 1.4 and took 35. I decided to write a review after a significant "acquaintance"…

In my own experience, testing at two separate points provides radically different outcomes: either the back or the front; nonetheless, there are occasions when it hits. Extremely acute, In addition, the focusing was not very good. In concept, page=5