Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 125
  • 5
    81
  • 4
    27
  • 3
    11
  • 2
    4
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

A fantastic addition for amateur cameras with cropped sensors. The "whale" is at its most useful for reporting at dark, when it is already partially blind. You can shoot portraits with it, but the results will be distorted and it does not have very good sharpness in the open. Just if you need it for growth, and only up to your waist, because fifty dollars won't get you very far. Aperture "Normal" (similar to that of the human eye) viewing angle for crop has various advantages. enables you to…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

It is undoubtedly beneficial to participate, particularly in terms of gaining experience, gaining a comprehensive awareness of the situation, and gaining an understanding of your requirements in general. It does not perform better than a picture that costs fifty kopecks, but it is handy for use when shooting inside. Many advantages: The picture quality has been drastically improved following the installation of the 18-55 whale and the Yangnow 35 and 50mm adjustments. Mounting bracket made of…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Exactly as promised by the manufacturer, high quality.

I transferred it to the Nikon D3100; however, the whale lens has been retired and is currently collecting cobwebs in the bag; I have never altered this charm. As a member of the staff working with DX cameras, that's it. Adequate price / quality ratio. The outcome of the images, as well as the lens's performance, have more than met my expectations. Has some pros A really successful gathering, albeit taking place in China. The lens, along with a case and a hood, is a nice piece of equipment. Size

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

When considering the cost, this is a really solid choice. With a small SLR, the Nikon D3100 took up very little space in the bag, which was one of the reasons I was quite impressed with its compact size and low weight. The autofocus is quick enough, and there is hardly any noise during operation; in fact, I nearly didn't detect the sound of the motor at all. The picture is quite interesting to look at, and it is unquestionably superior to what you can achieve with the whale 18-55 in terms of…

Pros
  • Superb sharpness even with the aperture all the way open The lens produces a high-quality image overall. Compact size Aperture\sPrice
Cons
  • Not even close to being the most practical focus length on the crop. In summary, there are virtually no drawbacks to speaking about in relation to the cost of the product, with the exception of a very visible lens hood play and some looseness of the focus ring (perhaps a feature of my copy).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

I pretty much gave up shooting it and went for a long stroll with just one corpse and one lens because I couldn't imagine anything better to do. What you need for street photography and shooting in places where you can't normally shoot is a camera that is compact and unobtrusive. In general, you should do so since you will not regret doing so. Pros: Because of its versatility, I believe that ninety percent of those who purchased it intend to use it as a universal lens on crop cameras. The hood…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

Before I started shopping for a solution, like many others, I researched a ton of different forums and read a ton of different reviews. I didn't want to make any mistakes. I have done a lot of reading, both positive and negative reviews. I went to the store and looked at, filmed, and felt the items. primarily contrasted with the amount of fifty dollars. As a consequence of this, I came to the realization that it is necessary to take 35-ku because, having a Nikon 3100, I didn't see the point in…

Pros
  • aperture and sharpness that come from nature
Cons
  • All of our flaws are internal, and the camera is only a tool to help us see them.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

Because there is no N emblem on the glass and no red stripe, it is not appropriate for use by just those who are majoring in a certain subject. There are no concerns about the pricing, but if I had to complain about something, it would be about the amount of money I make. I have only taken a few pictures so far, somewhere between 30,000 and 35,000 throughout the course of two years of operation. I shot during the day as well as at night, I captured portraits as well as landscapes, I shot macro…

Pros
  • Glass that is outstanding in every way. A very great image with everything present, including sharpness with an open (the most important thing is to get into the flu), color, and bokeh, and resistance to backlight, as well as reasonable macro (macro 1: 1 if you just want to), and a motor. The distance is relatively manageable, which is fantastic news for the crop. It is now being captured by a second camera; the previous model, the 5100, has been replaced by the 7100, and the lens appears to be much more advanced than before.
Cons
  • In some circumstances, not suited for FX cameras. Nonetheless, many people use it in a manner that involves a bang. Auto focus that has a satisfactory level of speed. There are pink windows, which are my wife's favorite, but I destroy them as soon as I put them in the converter.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

With its pros. Good aperture, the ability to shoot bokeh with a blurred background, compact. Comes with case and hood. Cons: I can't say, I didn't take many pictures. As long as everything suits.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

Both of my bodies, the d5100 and the d80, were satisfied with the lens's performance. Both have a quick focusing speed, maintain clarity throughout the frame, and produce passable bokeh. If anyone is interested, the accompanying camera does not appear to be a particularly stylish mega SLR. Nonetheless, the dimensions are notably smaller even when contrasted with those of the whale. Although this is not a 40mm canan pancake, which more closely resembles a plug for a mount, it is still quite…

Pros
  • 1. Easy to carry and not very big. 2. A lens hood is a part of the package (although it helps infrequently). 3. Aperture. A working aperture of 1.8 is highly useful. 4. Because of the appropriate angle, this figure can serve as a member of the staff. 5. Relatively inexpensive. 6. An extremely quick autofocus. 7. Extremely high sharpness, which is likely even higher than that of the Nikon 50 1.8 D.
Cons
  • By taking into account the cost, the lens does not have any drawbacks. Plasticity does not detract from its strength, lenses with focusing problems are not so common, and the fact that with a protective filter it desperately glares is completely solved by removing the filter.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

When I first started using it, it was a free bonus for purchasing the whale, but now it always costs the same as a regular one. A lot of people have written articles about curved autofocus. In this situation, we can't forget about the material. You can verify this by installing a depth of field calculator on your phone, such as DoF Calc. When shooting an item from a distance of two meters, the sharpest field you will have is only twenty centimeters wide. That is, only 10 centimeters in either…

Pros
  • Lightweight, compact, and has a nice appearance when mounted on the d5100. I bought the 18-55 as an addition to the kit for the purpose of taking portraits; however, I ended up not using the kit at all because, with the exception of the viewing angle, this 35mm is much more superior to the kit in every other regard. When compared to a whale, the aperture of a 35mm is approximately seven times higher (you can shoot at 100 iso with the same shutter speeds as with a whale at 800 iso under the same conditions), it creates a background blur that is significantly better than that of a whale, and it focuses significantly more quickly and precisely. The percentage of sharp images taken with this lens is disproportionately higher than those taken with the 18-55, which is actually quite pleasing given the depth of field is much reduced while shooting at an aperture of 1.8 as opposed to 4.5. (whale aperture at 35mm).
Cons
  • viewing angle. Yet, this is not a drawback but rather a feature of the product. You only need to have the awareness that panoramic photos cannot be taken successfully. To accomplish this, you will require a different lens.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

It does what it's supposed to do and hasn't jammed once. At f/1.8, the depth of field is only a few millimeters when the subject is one meter away, and it's probably only 1-2 centimeters when the subject is two to three meters away, which is why it looks like the entire image is blurry. However, this narrow band of clearly depicted space cuts through the rest of the image like a saw through a tree. Very effective. When there is an object in the depth of field, the background is drawn and washed

Pros
  • 1. Aperture (in conditions in which it would be impossible to read a book - it shoots like it's daytime, though at ISO 1600 and higher, and the shutter speed is somewhere between 1/5 and 1/10 of a second) On the other hand, there is not a great deal of noise visible in the picture. 2. The lens is small and lightweight, even with the hood mounted; beyond the 18-200mm range, it almost looked like there was no lens at all. 3. It does a great job of washing off the backdrop (called bokeh) and making the whole picture feel airier. The focus area is crisp, and I'd even go so far as to say it's naturally crisp. This means there is no soapiness or artificiality, but I didn't detect either. 4. To me, the focal length of 35 millimeters is the crop sensor's "golden mean" and "staff" (I put it on the d7000). 5. Despite the description calling for 30cm, it can focus as close as 15cm to the front lens and yet give a picture that is good and on level with that of fixed (if 1x2 meters are not going to print an image of a ladybug or a flower). When shooting an object from a distance of 15-20 cm with an aperture of 1.8, the depth of field will be around 1 millimeter. This means that an aperture of f/5.6 or higher is required to achieve 100% clarity across the image, even at small scales such as those found in insects, spiders, flowers, and jewelry. 6. Fantastically functional and lightweight lens hood. 7. seven-tined diaphragm (beautiful circles in bokeh). 8. Filters of the UV variety and others cost very little, and their filter diameter is only 52 millimeters. 9. USM is more of an advantage than a disadvantage (though I personally think that 35 or 50 mm doesn't matter, as they typically don't disable the dynamics in these situations). 10. Mounting bracket made of metal. 11. Beginning with version 1.8, the vignetting in my copy is completely absent.
Cons
  • Doesn't take pictures of themselves (1). Other from that, however, everything is to be expected, and there is nothing particularly faultworthy about the current scenario. It's too bad it doesn't fit the entire frame, but at least you can sell it in tandem with the carcass. Because of this, the incompatibility issues will be resolved. That's an option you could think about. 3 The autofocus actually misses by plus or minus one to two cm, but with a narrow depth of field like 1.8 or even 2.8, you certainly won't photograph ice skating, boxing, or running kids (too tiny depth of field, in my opinion, for such duties), so for leisurely shooting, it's OK.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

It would be a simple, everyday lens if it weren't for the fact that it has autofocus, and its focal length would give it a lot of flexibility. I brought a photograph that was made with this lens at f2.8 to show how powerful XA can be (pay attention to the branches at the top). And here are a few more photographs that illustrate bokeh as well as the overall picture in its entirety. Has some pros Compact. After the purchase, the autofocus functioned silently and to a satisfactory degree. There…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

I paid a total of 14,990 yuan for this miracle when I made the purchase at the beginning of March 2022 in an Amazon store located in Hong Kong. The price is obviously excessive in comparison to that of online stores (I found it for 13,000 and a filter as a free present), but some kind of garbage, they explained to me that there is a gray warranty, which does not include an official Nikon guarantee, and that is why it is cheaper. I have come to the conclusion that I will purchase the more…

Pros
  • a high degree of clarity and specificity.
Cons
  • It does not have a stabilizer.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn³'t expect the quality to be this good.

First on my list is the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX lens. I arrived to the conclusion that while the camera itself is "beginning" (a Nikon D3000), the optics should also be simplified for novices. Just this one magnificent lens might be considered "mature"! The lens is fairly good in terms of image quality and construction quality, despite the fact that it is not a top glass by any stretch of the imagination. The first photographs that he sent led to the joy of the children (before that, only the

Pros
  • - brightness - cheap (purchased at a reputable internet store; with delivery to my city, it turned out to be something about 8) - lightness and portability - metal bayonet - versatility
Cons
  • if there is not enough light, autofocus will not work. - It's eerie when you put on or take off the hood (the force on the latch is significant)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

Before I started using it in conjunction with the D3000, I had been taking pictures with the 18-55 for the previous six months. I have only been using it for a little over a month. I paid 6990 for it, and it had a very slight amount of front focus when I got it. Advantages: 1. Aperture, in comparison to 18-55, there is significantly more room for filming, and you do not need to worry about losing shutter speed when using polarizers. It can be shot in any type of street lighting, from early…

Pros
  • Ring focus, filter size, and aperture with seven blades
Cons
  • A few minor complaints about the workmanship and the autofocus being off.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Feel free to buy, for such a price, the quality is simply amazing.

The price-quality ratio is the best among everything that is produced for Nikon's crops. Landscapes, street portraits, photos of flowers - the lens copes with all this with a bang. I recently shot in the studio, made cool portraits on it without a flash with the light from the window. Different pros: the price for a fast lens is just a fairy tale, a universal focal length - I bought a tulka and a lens as a staff member. Although not so universal in terms of focal lengths, the picture is simply…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best product, from those that I have viewed, I advise everyone!

It’s definitely worth taking, for experience, understanding the picture and understanding your requirements in general. It does not outperform a fifty-kopeck picture, but it is convenient when shooting indoors. Different pros: After the 18-55 whale and the Yangnow 35 and 50mm fixes, the picture quality is completely different. Lightweight, metal mount. Working aperture from 2.2, but you need to try and the appropriate conditions. Confident autofocus operation, no need to adjust it, unlike at…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

An excellent fix, I took it to replace the standard 18-55. Focus at first, too, upset me, like many. This is a lens feature that takes some getting used to. It is eliminated by the appropriate camera settings and with experience of use. The absence of a stub is not annoying, because. because of its aperture, it is used at low shutter speeds. Nikon D5100 Some pros: Aperture, I rarely turn on the flash, even in the dark. The weight. Price. Has some cons Bad tightness. After several months of…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

I practically stopped shooting it, taking one carcass and one lens for a long walk, what could be better. Short and inconspicuous, what you need for street photography and shooting where you can’t shoot. In general, take it, you will not be disappointed. Pros: Versatility - I think 90 percent of those who bought it will use it as a universal lens on crop cameras. The absence of moving parts - and there are no complaints about the assembly, no backlash was noticed, the bayonet is metal, the…