Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Paul ᠌ photo
1 Level
276 Review
0 Karma

Review on MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 205/65 R16 99T winter by Wiktor Paul ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

A worthless product, definitely not worth your money!

I bought tires 2 years ago, skated for two seasons, the average mileage was 20-30.000 per year, that is, in winter no more than 15.000 km plus there was a pandemic. The SsangYong new actyon car, all-wheel drive, that is, slippage is basically excluded, the rear wheels look good, and the front ones seem to have been torn with pliers, but not completely pulled out. Driving style is moderate. Near the end of the second year of operation (circa February 2022), the car began to vibrate wildly when driving. I thought about anything except premium tires, but the reason turned out to be precisely in them. An "egg" appeared on the left front wheel. Being sure that this was a factory defect, I put them in the garage on disks in the summer, and in the fall it turned out that I had a 3.8 mm tread residue instead of the prescribed four, and therefore I was refused a guarantee. On the second front wheel, which without an egg climbed cord. I noticed this already when I handed over the tires under warranty. I bought them at one time acceptable, for 6,000 (215 / 65r16), now one wheel costs at least 11,200. Whether it is worth paying twice for tires of average quality, decide for yourself .

Pros
  • Placebo, you think that branded rubber will last for several years.
Cons
  • Drove no more than 20220 km

Comments (2)

Please, sign in to write a comment
July 14, 2023
Different pros: Good tires. Rescued in this snowy winter more than once. Cons below: a large number of spikes makes itself felt. noisy
July 10, 2023
Its pros: Rubber soft noise acceptable. Has cons: Haven't found it yet.