Review on Cordiant All Terrain 205/70 R15 100H summer by Mateusz Smoliski ᠌

Since no one has rolled on it in more than a year, the tires are still very new. For light off-road and forest paths, it was bought in June for a Toyota Estima automobile with a dimension of 205/70/15. Although Yokohama Geolandar A/T-S G012 tires, which are particularly popular among crossover owners, were also taken into consideration, Cordiant was more affordable. I used Geolandar on the prior car, so I can compare the two rubbers from that perspective. 1. Noise. Because the diesel engine may have been playing the first violin in the background sounds, replacing the old Barum Bravirus rubber with Cordiant went unnoticed. I believe it is incorrect to compare the Geolandar noise to that of an Ixtrail powered by gasoline. Asphalt 2. Excellent hydroplaning resistance, slight roll in corners, and surprisingly pleasant on joints and potholes. 3. Light and introductory off-road. It is far better than a motorway at allowing you to maintain a sufficient speed on a sandy-dirt track so you can ascend onto the beach and even drag other unfortunate people. It performs better than the Geolandar on clay, clears more quickly, and has more developed side lugs, helping you to escape a deep rut. Winter 4. I just so happened to be using it when the first snow fell. The worst winter tires are, in my opinion, considerably superior. Rubber loses its luster and control completely when driving on ice, acting as though it had no tread at all. 5. Wear. Wear is substantially more pronounced across 14,000 kilometers than it is on Geolandar. Even though we climbed enough sharp stones on this rubber and dodged several, sometimes very hard, potholes, we didn't suffer any hernias or cuts. Summary. Personally, I don't think I'll ever use this rubber again; I'll probably go with Geolandar. Fishermen and hunters, as well as those who enjoy climbing without damaging their tires, should use rubber.