What can I say. I have long wanted to compare it head-on with the Canon 50mm 1,8 STM. There was a suspicion that the front lens was too small for aperture 1,4. At one time, I sold Kenon to buy Yongnuo (due to aperture). Now he made a comeback, as he again began to shoot video with a camera. And here is my result: (there is a video on YouTube, look for the channel "For good") 1. I took photos with the same aperture values ββββfor both lenses (under the same conditions) and Yongnuo each time set the shutter speed 1/3 stop longer, while even the pictures from it look a little darker. (checked several times). And this means that Yongnuo is 1/3 stop darker than stated, that is, its real aperture is 1.6. And on a fully open one, it is not very good, and its working values ββare from 1.6 (1.8 in real life). At the same time, the picture from Yongnuo at its 1.6 does not differ from the picture of the STM lens at 1.8. That is, yeongnuo has no advantages. But. 2. With aperture covered up to 1.8 (2 in real life), Yongnuo becomes sharper and more contrast, and so on with covers at the same (actual) aperture values. So does it make sense to buy yeongnuo? Lenses cost the same. I always photographed on it at 1.6, which means that itβs like at 1.8 Canon. In general, it was not in vain that he made a comeback.
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D Lens: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras!
97 Review
New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction π· Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs
104 Review
π· Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Fixed Lens - Discontinued by Manufacturer
93 Review