Review on Yokohama BluEarth-A AE-50 215/65 R17 99V summer by Mateusz Boguszewski ᠌

Used on Nissan Teana 2.5L. Result according to subjective impressions: The price justifies itself. Don't expect premium performance from these tires. Braking dry 4, braking. wet 4, acceleration the same . Demolition in a turn 4, rutting 4, run-out 4, heading 3.5, noise 3.5, minor asphalt defects-3.5, potholes or policemen 4.5, appearance 3, aquaplan 4, it's too early to talk about wear resistance. I will compare it with 2 tires skated on this particular car. 1. If you compare it with the stock Dunlop 270 stock (Tean owners know what kind of muck it is)))) then Yoka in 225/55 R17 101W is just wonderful . And quieter and softer and there are no breakdowns in skid and start, and ABS is not cracks ahead of time, and aquaplane is better and so on . 2. If we compare it with the Michelin Primacy 3 (I consider it the standard of comfortable and reliable rubber with a rating of 5), then it would be good for . this Yoku. And if my toad added another 2.5 mowers per balloon to Michelin, then I would choose Michelin again))) Do you know what else? There is one more small moment))) This Yoka in 225/55 R17 101W looks just terrible on a regular disk) Even the stock Dunlop 270 looked more organic. I believe this is mainly due to the fact that Yoka in this size has a very modest flanging under the disk shelf . More precisely, it does not exist at all)))) . And according to this, Teana, shod in the Yokohama BluEarth-A AE-50 tire in size 225/55 R17 101W, looks like a cow in felt boots on a regular disk))) with other tire characteristics that are generally quite good for this price))) So in short we can say that how much this tire costs, so it rides))). I advise you to shoot your toad and get something better. Good luck)