Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Gagaan Pahal ᠌ photo
Bhiwani
1 Level
107 Review
172 Karma

Review on Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits by Gagaan Pahal ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, a normal product.

Bought an A65. Made in Japan is written (for me - so at best in one of the developing countries, and not in the queen of technology). I watched 2 copies - both with back focus. One whale glass is oblique at one angle. In another, the glass evenly lathers the corners, but the carcass backfocuses a little more clearly. He took it. In the service, by the way, on the day of purchase it is impossible to hand over. And the terms for adjusting the soneks in the Copy are not encouraging. Usually, people release endorphins from buying, but here it’s just annoyance and the feeling that I was cheated. Compared to the A350, the manufacturing quality of the A65 is much worse. 18-55 SAM is terrible rubbish against the background of Sony 18-70mm F3.5-5.6. That is why 18-70 was removed from sale - it interfered with the sales of expensive staffers such as babyseuse. I’m already thinking - can I return the A65, but sell the entire system, and move to the canon? There are minolta glasses for sale - write. Yes, if you choose a mirror system for yourself, bypass Sony. The quality is below the baseboard - almost all cameras require adjustment in the service. The assembly does not affect the quality - Japan / Thailand - everyone messes up. Do not think that everything is better with the A77 - the same troubles. On the A77 there is a focus adjustment for lenses, but it does not always help. 3 years ago the quality was much better. - ate. After adjustment and the release of firmware 1.05, the camera began to please. I work only with the central point - there are almost no problems with focus. Shooting video is fun - even with a cheap whale. Recently released 1.06 - the camera turns off even faster and you can disable the video button.

Pros
  • 1. For someone - shooting a video. 2. Personally, I wanted more speed and higher ISO performance than the A350. 3. Viewfinder - yes, it's good. 4. There is a decoupling of EVI from shooting parameters - useful for studio workers 5. Matrix. Loves the light - a feature of SLT. In the light it gives good quality and the ability to scribble a lot.
Cons
  • - quality of adjustment from factories - cheap plastic - few buttons, including the lack of a button to turn off the stub - no indication of the degree of stabilization - sd cards are slow. - memory sticks are slower than CF and more expensive. - CF is not. - no synchro contact - Overpriced. 28-30 for this craft is too much. 20k is the best.