Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Sam Simone photo
1 Level
1307 Review
68 Karma

Review on πŸ’Ž Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance by Sam Simone

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Works well enough, don't think it's actually 16 W/K

I took this to order to use it in my friend's montage. We used this paste because I ran out of Thermalright TF8 which I usually use (or TFX) and this paste claims to have a higher Wm/K compared to these two pastes. The performance I've seen on my friends' PCs (Ryzen 5 3600 / Hyper 212 Evo) is about the same as it was on TF8, but it's hard to tell unless I reinstalled it with TF8. I know that TFX is usually 2-3C better than TF8 in my own testing, so I'd say this paste is closer to 13Wm/K or a little less. This still makes it a great paste and competitively priced (at least at the time of writing) but I wouldn't say it's better than anything else and I definitely don't think it's better than TFX. If I do another build I'll try to get some TF8 and compare it directly to what I left here and then I'll update the review if I have new insights.

Pros
  • Extremely high thermal conductivity and stability: Thermal conductivity: 16 (W/mK) Max. temperature stability (℃): -50 ~ 200
Cons
  • Some little things