Review on Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art DC HSM Lens - Canon Compatible, Black (210101) by Anand Lal ᠌

After using a Canon 700D with a 17-55mm lens for a year, I decided to upgrade to a Sigma lens. I asked about the cost of the full frame for a considerable amount of time because I was under the impression that I would not benefit from the crop any further than I already did. That is to say, everything fell roughly inside the parameters that had been established by Canon marketers. I was thinking to myself, "There seems to be no reason to worry about the 17-55 lens; it seems to be sharp enough, okay, a little flimsy, but I'm not a pro, I shoot for my own enjoyment, and I get fantastic images for a family album." The lens has a focal range of 17 to 55 millimeters. Then, after purchasing a 70-200 f/4 lens with the intention of photographing children when they were out on walks, I came to the realization that the sharpness could be improved at a lower cost. However, the statement is still accurate; the 17–55mm lens is not part of the L-series. However, if you want the best bright regular zoom, you should get a full frame 24-70mm lens and you will discover a whole new level of happiness. Crop cameras are given a fresh lease on life as a result of the sudden and full destruction of this paradigm by the Sigma 18-35mm lens. As an aside, I upgraded from a 700D to a 7D simply for the sake of sigma after learning that the acquisition of FF lenses can now be put off for a considerable amount of time. There are no other formats that are comparable to the full frame. In this context, I wish to compare the Canon 17-55 and the Sigma 18-35 lenses. After taking the very first frame with one's own hand on the sigma, the advantages of the canon, which include a stub and a wider range of Possibilities, become largely irrelevant.