Pros
- Good handling, low noise level, balancing without problems with a minimum amount of cargo, price.
Cons
- Not detected
15/185/65 Maxxis Bravo HP-M3 88H Review
30
·
Very good
Rating
4.6
Automotive, 🛠️ Replacement Parts, 🧯 Ignition Parts, 🛠️ Replacement Parts
Media
(4)
Photos by authors
(5)
Description of 15/185/65 Maxxis Bravo HP-M3 88H
Maxxis HP-M3 Bravo - summer tires for SUVsThe Maxxis HP-M3 Bravo series tires are characterized by excellent handling, stability and fuel efficiency. The tread has a significant depth (13 mm), which ensures a long service life of the rubber and improves its traction and dynamic qualities. The model is presented in typical SUV sizes - from R16 to R20. The maximum allowable speed on such tires is 240 km / h (for modifications with the V index) and 270 km / h (for products with the W index).
Non-directional tread designThe high performance of Maxis HP-M3 Bravo summer tires is due to the special structure of the tread pattern. Three longitudinal ribs pass through its central part. They are formed from rigid rubber blocks separated by wedge-shaped drainage grooves. Tread ribs stabilize the car''s directional stability when driving along a straight path, and also improve the quality of braking and acceleration dynamics.
Increased Sipe ConcentrationDeep sipes are cut into the tread blocks, creating multiple gripping edges in the contact patch. They are located at different angles relative to each other, which improves grip in both longitudinal and transverse directions. Due to the increased depth, the sipes continue to function until the final wear of the tires.
When driving on wet road surfaces, these elements provide additional protection against hydroplaning. Excess moisture is instantly removed from the contact patch through the lamellas and the main drainage system. This allows you to safely drive the car in rainy and slushy weather, without the risk of getting into an uncontrolled skid on the water film.
Cornering stability One of the tire''s distinguishing features is the increased width of the shoulder zones. These tread sections consist of rectangular rubber blocks with pointed edges. When cornering, they create gripping edges that prevent uncontrolled skidding.
Long service life Due to the optimized shape of the contact patch, it was possible to significantly reduce the intensity of physical wear of the tread. Dynamic loads in exact proportions are distributed between the blocks of the central and shoulder zones, thereby preventing uneven abrasion of the blocks.
Hide
Pros
- No
Cons
- Noisy, poor handling in a rut. Haven't tried it on wet pavement yet. Pretty long braking distance.
Pros
- On Mitsubishi Outlander 3. I tried it out for the first time, and although I had my reservations, it turned out that there wasn't nearly enough terrible rubber in it. Before that, there was yokohama, and the MAXXIS BRAVO HP ended up being the more quiet option. Handling is good. I haven't tried it out in the rain yet, so I'm crossing my fingers that it works.
Cons
- We were unable to find it.
Pros
- Excellent cost-effectiveness On a well-maintained, noise-free road, Doesn't bang into walls or hammer through wells and manholes. Brace for the Discs
Cons
- Strict (concealed?) Noisy on lower-quality and medium-quality asphalt The ABS looked to have activated too quickly.
Pros
- Price, performs well even when the roads are wet.
Cons
- Resistance to wear, extremely high rolling resistance, and abrasiveness.
Pros
- Value the quality. Resistance to wear and tear. conduct while racing on the track. Excellent performance in wet conditions
Cons
- In theory, there are none, and in practice there are very few (there is some noise, and occasionally some small stones get lodged). But these are all just petty concerns.
Pros
- Resistance to wear and tear, quietness, comfort, and an affordable price
Cons
- did not reveal
Pros
- Cost, in relation to the level of craftsmanship. Drawing
Cons
- not disclosed as of yet
Pros
- Despite having 30,000 miles on them, it would appear that the markings have not been removed at all. They have the standard dimensions of 215/55/17 and are designed to fit on the Subaru Outback b13. Clay does not seem to notice at all, and he continues to eat normally. For a tire with such a low price point, the steering response is very good. At speeds up to 87 miles per hour (140 km/h), hydroplaning is hardly noticeable.
Cons
- First of all, when I bought it, I saw that the tread wasn't particularly deep in comparison to what I've seen from other manufacturers. However, because it says that it has a lengthy playing time, I didn't place too much importance on this aspect of the product. After 15,000 miles driven on a variety of asphalt types, the tires' treads developed a distinctively rougher and louder surface. It has also been observed that the rubber has a normal grip on the road at temperatures over +20 degrees and at temperatures below +4, which is likewise normal. But between the temperatures of +4 and +20, well, that's simply average, and being wet at this temperature is not particularly warm. It never made the stabilizing mechanisms and other things on the yakohama that stood before it work in the summertime. Additionally, it occurred while turning bends and while applying the emergency brakes.
Pros
- Long hours of research led me to the evaluations of this tire. A 265/65R17 H-rated tire. Since the maker is based in the Middle Kingdom, I had my doubts about the decision being the best option. However, I did manage to learn a little bit about the manufacturing firm. (Makes tires for use on bikes with relatively short wheels). Also close to the natural rubber-producing country of Thailand. I made up my mind to get it. Rubber itself is soft and pliable, whereas the sides are firm. Finding a middle ground is graded. First issue due in 2022. It's good, too. There is no discernible direction to the pattern, and the load index of 112 means that each wheel can carry about 1300 kilograms. Prado 150 (2,900 kg) thought the wheels looked just fine. The capacity to control is outstanding. You can hear the tread for the first 20 kilometers, but I barely tasted the food the next day. The perfect level of softness and silence. Check the sticker near the driver's seat to see what tire pressure the manufacturer suggests. and things will turn out OK! It's something I advise. The car knows the tire is light, so it doesn't have to work as hard to accelerate.
Cons
- I didn't know what to make of the rubbery, slightly fake aroma at first. At Bridgestone, such a thing just does not exist. Visually, it was a struggle to put together the tire not from two halves but from individual regions. However, concerns disappeared throughout setup and balancing. Each of the four wheels was balanced independently. 0-30, 40-40, 10-20, 40-50. However, this is not optimized. A complete elimination of it was possible.
Pros
- Value for the money, a soft composition that is very quiet, and an excellent universal tread pattern. Unsurprisingly, it's the most for city driving, clocking up to 140.
Cons
- Since there are no statistics yet, I am unable to assess the rubber's strength and wear resistance, but I have a suspicion that its soft composition will limit its lifespan to no more than two seasons or 40 thousand kilometers. Yes, and this was the model's single significant flaw, according to the test of a reputable printed newspaper.
Pros
- annoyance and resilience to wear and tear Controllability
Cons
- No results found
Pros
- The cost is the biggest benefit. She initially had concerns, but after the installation on the automobile, everything was OK. Prior to that, there existed a Dueler Bridgstone, which serves as Toyota's benchmark for the American market. 2022 Toyota Venza with 245X55X19 wheels. Low noise on a variety of surfaces is the next benefit. Bridge heard the howl. The third benefit is excellent handling in water-filled ruts and on a water film. virtually undetectable.
Cons
- At the conclusion of the year, nothing significant was revealed for two and a half months. It can be a touch harsh, with a sharp "gas" there is a tiny slip.
Pros
- - must be maintained in either dry or wet weather - complete and utter silence - a dizzying spin - the price (this is even the first) - powerful (when I was in the woods, I repeatedly leapt on the roots), - braking - reviews (do not lie)
Cons
- - challenging to maintain balance, with a large number of weights - Although I would prefer it, the wear resistance does not come in first place. carries out its turns more quickly than the 235 it passed. As a direct consequence of this, during the course of the year, a one-fourth or even a third of the face was removed. The most significant disadvantage for me turned out to be, or more accurately, it turned out to be pebbles of a medium size. I believe this to be a prejudiced point of view. repeatedly prodded with a screwdriver to gain access. Oh, how they tricked me, the screwdriver was always in the door. I should have known better. you proceed to leave the priming and click, but there is nothing you can do in the mud since it clogs and is not cleansed.
Pros
- Value, durability, and manageability
Cons
- failed to disclose
Pros
- Quite quiet. Soft. In the rain, the road held up well. In dry conditions, the road holds very well. Fantastic braking.
Cons
- It's not for dirt, in my opinion. My travels are limited to a dry country road.
Pros
- One of the primary advantages is, of course, the cost. Low noise, good management, and the ability to contain puddles. Maintains a good equilibrium 30g per wheel
Cons
- Haven't revealed yet.
