Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
🚀 experience power and speed with amd ryzen 7 1700x processor logo

🚀 Experience Power and Speed with AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor Review

46

·

Very good

Revainrating 5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.8
🧰 Computer Internal Components, 💻 Computer Components

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to 🚀 Experience Power and Speed with AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor
img 2 attached to 🚀 Experience Power and Speed with AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor
img 3 attached to 🚀 Experience Power and Speed with AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor

Photos by authors

(1)
img 4 attached to 🚀 Experience Power and Speed with AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor

Details

BrandAMD
CPU ManufacturerAMD
CPU ModelUnknown
CPU Speed0.1 GHz
CPU SocketSocket AM4

Description of 🚀 Experience Power and Speed with AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor

Product Characteristics

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a powerful computer internal component that offers exceptional performance for demanding tasks. With its high clock speed and advanced architecture, this processor delivers impressive computing power. Designed for the AM4 socket, it provides a seamless fit into compatible motherboards, ensuring smooth operation and easy installation.

Similar Products

When comparing the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X to other desktop barebones processors, it stands out as a top contender. Its multi-threading capabilities and eight cores make it an ideal choice for users seeking ...

Reviews

Global ratings 46
  • 5
    37
  • 4
    8
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

Previously, I had been using a 945 fan that was approximately 8 years old; nevertheless, I chose to switch to ryzen. I purchased it used in December for 14,000 dollars, and it came with a macho rev. b cooler. In addition, I purchased 16 gigabytes of fast b-die peer-to-peer storage from Samsung. a promising outlook for the years to come, but as of right now I don't see any justification for overclocking for the sake of overclocking)

Pros
  • good %, everything flies, in multitasking 16 threads absolutely rule toys are played, autocad autocad, a browser with 10 tabs is open, and all of this is happening at the same time and there are no lags =)
Cons
  • did not find

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Ryzen 1700 is the processor in question here. Replaced my Ryzen 1200 processor with it. Be silent!, ASUS Rog Strix X470-F Gaming motherboard, 32GB RAM, RX580 video card—those are the components I use with this cooler. DARKROCK PRO 4 There is a discernible difference in work-related apps; however, there is none in Overwatch, and the Ryzen 1200 was sufficient for that game overall. Testing it in games has not yet been possible due to a lack of testing time.

Pros
  • - 8 cores and 16 threads - Low cost, I purchased it for 11200 dollars - Stable operation when overclocked to 3700 megahertz and voltage of 1.26 volts -
Cons
  • Did not make it public. With regard to its cost, the TOP

At the pricing in 2022, of course I would not recommend it because it is getting on in years. The situation is not hopeless on the BU market. During a stress test at a frequency of 3700 MHz, it showed a temperature of 67 degrees Celsius under the Deepcool GAMMAXX GT.

Pros
  • A solid eight core. It is possible to attain low temperatures by using voltages that are appropriate and frequencies that are fixed. While multithreading can be helpful in business programs, it might be better to look into something more modern for games.
Cons
  • A little bit old.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

I took it in April last year, a year later I am writing a review. The processor is good, AMD rehabilitated itself after a failure. I recommend! Pros below: Works just great. Everything flies, copes with any tasks with a bang. Renders just cosmically fast. Overclocking with a box cooler is possible! Has cons: Problems at the start with RAM support, but this is more likely to the bios of motherboards.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

I've been using it for 4 years now and have no complaints. Games are pulled along with the good old AMD Radeon RX 580 at 8 GB for almost everything, the rendering is excellent in speed, the new processors are not much ahead in terms of their parameters.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

The deepcool archer worked for me for a month, but the temperature in the renders is 80 degrees Celsius. Windows 7 booted up smoothly after sysprep, but on Windows 10 it is not required; all you need to do is swap out the motherboard and CPU. I tried running it at 3600 megahertz, but I was not happy with the results. As a result, I downloaded MasterLiquid 240 and overclocked it to 3925 megahertz. After that, I received 55 gr. maximum, and games now run at 60Hz or more (my TV already runs at…

Pros
  • 1700, which required 3925 at 1.35v (1.38v with LLC) (BPM was no longer permitted on the Asus B350M-K motherboard). memory alone brought her profile up to 2933, with timings of +1 for each round. I took 3066, but because I was dancing, I ended up taking 3200 (Hunix chips, so this is par for the course). CB15 1t = 156 16t = 1700 cpu-z 1t = 425 16t = 4790 (who here requested for benches, here at 3925 frequency) CB15 1t = 156 16t = 1700 cpu-z 1t = 425 16t = 4790
Cons
  • 1. speeding up the clock 2. the speed as well as the latency of the memory and the caches 3. For the same price that we pay, they sell the boxed versions with coolers in other countries. 4.. 5. YES, IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY MINUSES:)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Bought a 1700x pro It turned out that there is no automatic overclocking, but you can find the setting in the BIOS (gigabyte B450M) and raise the frequencies from 3400 to 3800 at least (no longer tested) promised by the manufacturer on the site ")

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

Pros below: Wild performance. Compared to my previous stone (i5-2400), it's just heaven and earth. The temperature is just amazing. 52 degrees in load (games) air-cooled. In stress tests, it was not higher than 72. ASUS TurboEvo set automatic 3650MHz at 12022V Some cons: Does not chase above 3950 MHz in my case. Unable to run memory over 2933MHz (Patriot based on Samsung D chips, 2 channels, dual rank)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend the product for purchase.

Just in case, I will explain: the above described bug does not appear on all assemblies. It is likely that most users do not have such problems (or simply do not know about them, especially if they use the computer in the "turned on, played, turned off" mode). But for Linux users who often run the system in server mode with long periods of idle time without load, knowing about the bug before buying can save a lot of nerves and time later.

Pros
  • Great processor for multi-threaded tasks. Works very smart. Compiling gentoo under it is just a fairy tale.
Cons
  • Great processor for multi-threaded tasks. Works very smart.Compiling gentoo under it is just a fairy tale.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

windows7 started up easily after sysprep, on win10 it is not required, just change the motherboard with the processor and that's it, on the cooler deepcool archer worked for me for a month but the temperature in the renders is 80g. I was not satisfied with 3600 MHz, so I installed masterliquid 240 and overclocked it to 3925 and got 55 gr. maximum, games go 60Hz + (TV set 60Hz, so more is not needed) all sorts of encoders / renderers / compilers fly 16 threads almost 4GHz what else do you need?…

Pros
  • 1700 - took 3925 at 1.35v (1.38v with LLC) (no longer allowed BPM on asus b350m-k motherboard) memory without dancing took her profile to 2933, with timings +1 I took 3066, well, with dancing I took 3200 (Hunix chips, so this is normal) CB15 1t = 156 16t = 1700 cpu-z 1t = 425 16t=4790 (who here asked for benches, here at 3925 frequency)
Cons
  • 1. overclocking 2. speed/latency of memory and caches 3. for the price that we have, they sell boxed ones with coolers abroad . 4. . 5. YES IT HAS NO MINUSES :)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I did not regret the purchase, everything is fine.

When I converted to it from Phenom II x2 unlocked to x4 in 2022, I bought an Intel i5-2500K and was so impressed by its power that I believed there was no way I would ever go back to using an AMD processor. i5-2500K was wonderful for everyone, and it was possible to overclock it to 5 GHz while keeping the solder in place and keeping it cool. It was like something out of a fairy tale in comparison to the FX. Even after working with computers for the past 25 years, I continue to believe that the…

Pros
  • + The most significant benefit is the low cost + The low price per core + The eight cores + The low thermal design power + The low power consumption (not to be confused with TDP. TDP and consumption are not the same thing, despite the fact that 90% of people believe that they are) + Solder behind the lid + Cheap motherboards with no overclocking limits
Cons
  • - Most commonly, a low overclocking frequency between 3.8 and 3.9 is used. - Ryzen has a gloomy appearance due to its poor performance per core per MHz, which, when combined with its low overclocking on a single thread, makes Ryzen look even worse. - Infiniti factory (the common bus of operation is only on one bus), thus Ryzen requires RAM with a frequency of 3200 MHz or higher and just two ranks (if you take two bars); if you take four bars, then you need to pick single-rank ones.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

I purchased this CPU in China; it was 24,000 yuan for an asrock x370 killer slit and a Ryzen 1700. The strength of this processor is highly redundant for day-to-day work and games; I was able to load more than 50 percent of it with just 12 lineage 2 classic windows. There is no reason, in my opinion, to increase this processor's clock speed. sufficient power for games, browsing, and other background applications such as Mouzon, Kinchik, and so on. Easy on the hands when you play: There is a…

Pros
  • multitasking
Cons
  • 1) Performing dance moves while playing a tambourine during acceleration 2) Unprocessed platform

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

If someone had told me twelve months ago that I would pick AMD for a new personal computer in a year rather than Intel, I would have laughed extremely loudly directly in his face, spraying spit, and said that only if I wanted to punish myself with perpetual torment of waiting with an act of self-immolation at the end of the process. It was determined that someone would be correct. Only in the very end would I consider purchasing a CPU that is inferior to the analogue from Intel for a MORE…

Pros
  • - Fast. It was primarily intended to operate in 3DS MAX, which is why I purchased it; nevertheless, I use it as a CPU for gaming. When it comes to rendering, it is absolutely incomparable; of course, it is a VERY huge order superior to the assembly on 2 Xeons, and the performance of a single Xeon is superior to 2 times. But now I'm going to talk about processors that can cost anywhere from $1000 to 1900 dollars, depending on the model, and this one goes for approximately 400 dollars. The most powerful consumer version of Intel's i7 processor, the 7700, will not do well in the test, and the 6950, which costs $1,000, won't do much better than it. The frame rate of games is typically fairly high. If you are unable to tell the difference between 100 and 110 frames per second, Ryzen is the safest option for you to go with. — a chilly feeling. To the best of my knowledge, the temperature setting for models 1700x and 1800x is approximately 20 degrees too high. Even assuming that this is not the case, the temperature is still very cold. I have not risen beyond 80 degrees yet.
Cons
  • It is quite disappointing that Windows 7 does not have complete support available. From the 10s so far, I do not have a very favorable impression; it seems to me that it is not holistic in some way, there is no unified ergonomics and style, and everything is somehow in parts, a little bit from 7, a little bit from 8, and a little bit more any heretic. Consequently, I consider this to be a major strike against it. -RAM needs. If the frequency is increased to 3200 from 2667, then the change in performance is not nearly as significant; it is only 3-5% greater. The performance increases by 10-20% when the frequency is raised from 2667. This is what the reviewers have to say about it. That is why I decided to get 2666 MB of RAM.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

In Battlefield 1, a game that takes place on Earth, frequent brakes on multiplayer vanished when a GeForce980GTX was included in the system. The proportion of the game's map that is loaded increased by fifty percent, and coolers that were set to auto-adjustment practically never left the low-noise mode. If you are interested, I have HyperX Fury 32 gig 2133 frequency memory available for you to purchase. a group of four sets of eight bars. During the test, I did not have control of the memory…

Pros
  • I was unable to locate anything that I could download. I have Universe Sandbox2. Using this piece of software, I was able to create a simulation of the impact of three galaxies colliding. I had, in the past, attempted to simulate this scenario with a Phenom 2 x6 1075t. When the galaxy merger had begun, the ship entered a blue screen and crashed. And on Ryzen, not only did the procedure succeed in reaching its conclusion, but the simulation speed was also able to surpass 500,000 years per second. CPU utilization 52%. What were your reasons for using Universe Sandbox? only the processor is loaded here. and loads in the correct manner. However, he was unable to completely load it. I will search for further simulations. The concept of a double neutron star orbiting a black hole was interesting and potentially useful. The simulation speed was reset to 0.5 seconds per second when extra big bodies were present.
Cons
  • purchased a BOX. I foolishly believed that the kit would come included with a chiller of some sort. A sticker on the side of the box reveals that there are some of the packaged varieties that do not include a cooler.

I grabbed it when the model debuted in the first season. Overheating from an excessive initial setting was the first sign of trouble. The issues disappeared after I disabled overclocking. Everything is OK after leaving it at 1. Overclocking doesn't make sense in most cases. Nonetheless, I'm determined to extract as much as possible, so I endured. While I wait a little longer and make my way to the new series, I can't help but fantasize about making the switch to the 3950s.

Pros
  • Threads and frequency of output from the TOP box's performance
Cons
  • Lame optimization - Heat dissipation

I spent 26k on the 1800s in KU to avoid fiddling with overclocking and other dances. He gave him a 32GB Samsung 2400 and an ASUS B350M-A. In terms of work (mainly Adobe CS6), no issues. I don't understand why they worry about problems when everything is stable. Perhaps as a result of overclocking. Games like Skyrim, however, start out strong. Because there is so much power available, you can't even close programs; you merely switch them off, unfold, and carry on working. When starting work apps

Pros
  • 1. The cost of 8 cores Cold (remain silent for 1.9k). 3. Do you require anything else from the processor?
Cons
  • Not much to say. It continues to have no equivalents for such money.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I have not regretted the purchase, everything is fine.

The processor is reserved solely for use in professional endeavors. And there it is; taking into account the cost of it, it is clearly not something that Intel is capable of achieving. On the other hand, if you are putting together a gaming rig and you want to use high-end hardware, then the 1800X is not the ideal option for you. You would save money by purchasing either the 1600X or the 7700K, even if the former option costs more. Also, do not pay attention to individuals who yell about…

Pros
  • Price Performance
Cons
  • Low overclocking potential, although these are minor complaints because the performance is sufficient.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

In fact, AMD finally did it, I haven’t had processors from the red ones for more than 6 years, but now I can definitely say that this is a breakthrough so that the blue fans don’t squeal there. AMD is finally pushing 4/6/8 cores 8/12/16 threads into the mass segment, instead of 2/4 cores 4/8 threads that Intel has been feeding us for so many years, selling the same percentage every year. I do not regret at all that I took 1700, I think it will be a long-liver comparable to sandy i7.

Pros
  • 1. Overclocking potential (takes 3700 MHz at a drain voltage of 12022V) 2. No need to scalp, unlike ., solder under the lid, but chewing gum 3. 8 cores 16 threads for the price of 4 cores and 8 threads! 4. AM4 platform will live for at least 3 more years according to AMD 5. A trifle, but nice, a stock cooler with a nice LED backlight, keeps overclocking at 3500 for all cores (in fact, the performance is 1700x)
Cons
  • I can’t overclock at full power yet, so to speak, because I’m still sitting on a stock cooler (thank you 2022 Post!)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

In general, I am satisfied with the purchase, because for a minimum increase in money I replaced the old 1155 platform. Has some pros: + Productivity in professional tasks increased by 2 times compared to the former 3770K +Potential for the future + Price compared to competitors + Ability to use a budget motherboard for overclocking +Low operating temperatures Got cons: -In games, the difference was not noticed - Overclocking is rather weak, an increase of 400 MHz or 10% speed is not enough and

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

I took Ryzen 1700 for work (and a little for games). There are simply no competitors in terms of power in the price segment, i. E. no options here. When I assembled the system unit, BSODs constantly fly out, I spent a month, and drove synthetics, and memtest, and Aida, etc. everything is in order, I set a real task for processing in 3d's max - crash, blue screen =( Projects are burning, work is not being done - everything is very sad =(((( I began to study the topic of overclocking and…

Pros
  • - price/performance ratio - useful and unique experience with hardware
Cons
  • - children's ailments - several dozen gray hairs when setting up the system - you may need "straight" hands