Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 223
  • 5
    180
  • 4
    23
  • 3
    11
  • 2
    5
  • 1
    4

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

If you do not bother with the temperature, then this is the best processor at the moment in terms of money and performance. Works on x370 motherboard. I set the cooler speed to a minimum of up to 75 degrees, so during normal operation the fan does not respond in any way to wild jumps in processor temperature. Its pros: Compared to the 3400G, it's very fast. It is felt even when working with office applications and in the operating system. Got cons: Hot. In stock and no load, the temperature…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

It's good that AMD is creating healthy competition for Intel, but I don't like that AMD, like Intel, is doing more marketing. Intel fed consumers with penny increases for 10 years and 10 generations of processors (it will increase productivity by 5-10%, then it will increase energy efficiency with savings of 100 per month, then it will integrate primitive graphics), now AMD with its zens also adds a little bit . In the first generation, the frequency is slightly lower and a boost for a couple…

Pros
  • Good performance, but not high enough frequency for an advanced technical process, in games due to this it is inferior even to overclocked intels on the 2022 first generation socket.
Cons
  • The lack of overclocking potential and the feeling that the frequency is artificially limited by marketers in order to sell this option in the form of the next generation of processors. In terms of frequency, it is comparable to the overclocked ryzen 7 2700 that I had before it, in terms of performance per core it is also very close to the overclocked 2700, but somewhat colder (by 5-10g depending on the load and no jumps, as they wrote in other reviews), and On the other hand, the voltage jumps higher under load. In terms of price-performance ratio, I liked it less than the Ryzen 7 2700.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

Magnificent stone. Finally, I became a happy owner of an elite ryazhenka. Now, I'm not ashamed to be among my gorgeous and very rich amd friends.

Pros
  • The best Ryazan for such money.
Cons
  • Why is Lisa Su not my Wife?!)))))

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

I took a 1600X instead. I am satisfied with the purchase, because with points and at a discount, it cost me a little more than 10,000. I overclocked it to 4.3 GHz at a voltage of 1.26250 V. on an Asus Rog strix b550-f gaming Wi-fi motherboard. Cooled with dropsy from fractal design, idle 36-39 degrees, aida stress test, occt 68-70.

Pros
  • Price/performance. By right, the people's processor.
Cons
  • No complaints.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality didn't let me down.

Got a processor with bent legs. Fortunately, the bent legs were on the very edge, so I managed to carefully straighten them with a needle and a plastic card.

Pros
  • Price-quality ratio
Cons
  • They brought the processor with bent legs. So choose your supplier carefully.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

I put it on the motherboard GIGABYTE B450 AORUS ELITE V2, plus a set of A-Data XPG Gammix D10 32 GB dies, on a GF 1050 ti video card, I got a beast machine. Under my needs even with search. Yes, I also stuck the system on an M.2 128 GB SSD, A-Data XPG SX6000 Lite. Everything flies, I did not dream of more.

Pros
  • Excellent powerful processor. 6 cores 12 threads.
Cons
  • Not found

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

the temperature at maximum load is 57 degrees with a cheap Chinese pumeitou cooler (it seems to be called that), in the photo it is he. AMD thank you so much for not having to throw away old motherboards, and you can not change the cooler since the 2022s)))

Pros
  • low price compared to intel. support for a huge number of manufacturers of RAM. ease of overclocking as needed. support on older motherboards.
Cons
  • slightly gluttonous, but not for everyone this is a minus

Revainrating 1 out of 5

A terrible purchase, I sympathize with everyone who bought it.

the market delivers low-quality goods from a bad seller, marvel is just the worst office, as a result, they froze the money and there is no problem . percent with damaged textolite, obviously damaged before packaging

Pros
  • CPU
Cons
  • came killed in the trash

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

I started assembling a PC from 0, the first thing I decided to do was buy a processor and I had a lot of choice after looking at the reviews on YouTube, I decided to take this one. He came to me within a week, the delivery was from Hong Kong to Ufa

Cons
  • There is not

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the product suited me, the price is generally perfect.

Delivery by courier in 5 days. The processor is intact, the legs are not bent I took the OEM version (I preferred the tower cooler to the box cooler) Wound up from the box at honest 3600 MHz There is potential for overclocking.

Pros
  • Quick.
Cons
  • Quite hot (quite typical for ryzen ), not critical

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

In general, if you do not take into account the current dollar exchange rate at the time of writing this post, and this is May 4, 2022, the cost of this processor is not bad in the end, it competes with processors from the Intel camp. If we take the closest competitor in the face of the 9400f, then at the final cost the latter will be more expensive than the Ryzen 5 3600. The disadvantages in our case, when purchasing a processor from AMD, is that there is practically no possibility of…

Pros
  • Decent performance Good competition from Intel

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but it was a pleasant surprise.

I wish that I overpaid for the boxed version instead of buying an oem. Who needs a good processor with an average budget, I can advise you to buy an oem option and what remains to be spent on cooling the processor stove). After installing good cooling, the overheating disappeared, but I also had to lower the voltage in the BIOS by fixing it in position 1 and the frequency by 3200. So all the problems disappeared and finally you can enjoy the purchase

Pros
  • Very good performance for gaming, and most importantly for work tasks, subject to the purchase of separate cooling
Cons
  • Cooling in a boxed version is meaningless and a waste of money. Severe overheating and throttling. Heating moments of 112 degrees in the load.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

- Probably the best option if you are going to do something on your computer besides games and for you the power in third-party non-gaming applications is more important. If you are building a gaming computer, it’s normal, unlike me, to treat Intel - it’s probably worth looking in the direction of Intel, and specifically i5 10400f, it seems that according to tests, even 0.1low gives out SIGNIFICANTLY better than 5 Ryazan (which means less drawdowns and more stability), average FPS is also…

Pros
  • - Power. Yes, for its price and if you are looking for functionality NOT only for games - the Ryzen line is generally the best choice for you. - Overclocking potential - yes, it is, if the motherboard allows it, as well as cooling . But more on that later :) - Because of the hype, most motherboards seem to work with the processor in a friendly pair from the box, but such moments are better controlled, on some sites it is taken out as a separate line. - Very smart. Again, very subjective, before that I was already sitting on prehistoric fx 8xxx (no, I didn’t indulge in overclocking, it was just enough). But work even in the simplest tasks, or rather the speed of this work, is just a completely different level, and in games that I even tried with my hardware - which is not very cool, it more than suited me, given that I don’t play super graphic games , maybe I have everything only 1660 (not even Ti or Super). - Still, in specials like video and photo processing, it is a cut above Intel models in the price segment.
Cons
  • - Temperature. This is not exactly a minus, rather . The consequence of my stupidity. DON'T DARE to take the BOX version with an AMD cooler. At the time of my purchase, the box version costs 1.300 more than the OEM. And, it would seem, it's not expensive, but . It's better to take some DEEPCOOL 400 or PCCOOLER 5 or 6 series. Yes, they cost somewhere more expensive by, well, I don’t know, depending on the model, 300-700 (i. E. 1600 - 2022) and they will cool BETTER. If you don’t want to believe my value judgments, the Internet is full of tests with screenshots, good luck. If you also have a mATX case, but you want a 120 fan, then of course PcCooler is best to take from the tower ones - it has a height of only 148 mm (for series 5, I don’t know for 6). - Among other things, this is probably an option for . Well, I don't know, computer geeks? Probably in most cases, Ryzen will make you play with the BIOS settings, with the processor voltage and the multiplier, which is unlocked here. Plus, in Intel's piggy bank - there, probably, there will be no need to suffer like that. But at the same time, the multiplier is unlocked there only in models with a K indicator at the end - for example, i7 8700k. As if plus in the direction of AMD, but do you need it? It's up to you to think.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

It's the best purchase I ever made, I will definitely do it again.

With manual overclocking to 4.3 GHz, we get wildly high heat dissipation, and performance is + - the same. I switched to it from 1700. When playing games at a resolution of 2560 * 1400 with anti-aliasing enabled, even with the frame counter, there is no difference at all. I made this conclusion on the latest Larka and Forza Horizon 4. In general, I liked the pros. I haven't run into any issues in a week of use.

Pros
  • Work to the maximum out of the box. PBO boosts percentages to the maximum. Earned at a memory frequency of 3600 MHz on 14 14 15 32 CR1 on the Asus x370 strix f gaming motherboard.
Cons
  • Lack of overclocking

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, good quality, not bad.

Very good processor for the money. However, with its own oddities, for example: With auto overclocking, it can overclock one core to some kind of arbitration "Ceiling" (each time the ceiling is different) and keep it there. And will not accelerate further. This was fixed in the BIOS ate on motherboards (ABBA), however, for some reason, the processor now performs worse in benchmarks. The stock cooler is no good. It's better to take without it.

Pros
  • - Accelerates automatically - Good in one thread - Good in multiple streams
Cons
  • - Stock cooler does not handle heat - You need to ate the bios on old AM4 to make this processor work - Oddities when working with the bios of motherboards

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

Moved from i7 7700K. In games + - the same thing, only faster loading. When working with video and other voluminous tasks, it is better - 30-40% faster. And most importantly, much colder and therefore quieter. Cheap dropsy for a couple of thousand for the eyes, no need to scalp. The solution is in style - set it and forget it, it's not even necessary to overclock.

Pros
  • 6 cores / 12 threads. ~330 gigaflops in Linx. Works on any motherboard socket AM4 after flashing. Works with memory up to 4400 megahertz (tried on v450), there is no difference after 3600 in games, but still. The price, for 13 thousand, is out of competition. Better than 9400f, about equal to 9600k, but colder than both. Cold, even in overclocking fits under 65W coolers
Cons
  • Weak overclocking, it is very difficult to squeeze more than 4200 MHz for a constant. You need a memory of 3000-3600 MHz, otherwise it drains the steuda) Likes to heat the chipset on the motherboard

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

Everything is known in comparison and I compare with my previous processor - 4690k. Heaven and earth. For my money, an excellent 6-core came out. I hope it will be the same with it as with the previous processor, I installed it and forgot it for 5 years. To compare with analogs from Intel - I do not suffer from debilizm. Therefore, plus or minus a couple of frames in games or a couple of points in the benchmark, plus or minus a couple of thousand for this - I'm not interested. I needed an…

Pros
  • Price Number of cores/threads Zen2 Heat dissipation Infinity Fabric AM4 compatibility
Cons
  • Price Short life cycle

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The average quality of the product, especially for such money.

The processor was surprised by the fact that it works at a voltage of 1.45 volts, but everything seems to be working fine and in windows the voltage drops to 1.37 and even then under load. The performance is certainly not great, but I hope it will be enough for tanks. Approximately 30% inferior to the 7820X in terms of computing performance and at least 40% in bandwidth, but of course it costs 3 times cheaper.

Pros
  • + inexpensive + cold
Cons
  • - not the best performance

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is working, but I will not repeat the purchase for sure.

What a circus. Before that, Intel was also at 65W. The cooler did not change, it was decent. I put this slag from the red ones, launched the render. Accelerates to a frequency of 4200 MHz - 95 degrees. What is it like? What are the jokes? Why should I, when buying a finished product that says "heat dissipation 65W", sit in the BIOS and cut the voltage? He really has 65 watts. At a frequency of 3600 MHz. At 4200 there are all 130. And I was delighted, Intel got sick, the motherboard was buggy…

Pros
  • -consider overclocked out of the box - socket AM4, you can not change the motherboard -12 threads
Cons
  • - inconsistency with the declared 65W - a claim in principle to the mount AM4. It's scary to put a cooler, I put different ones, to snap it into place, you need a strong effort, the board already bends, it's scary

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

I decided to transfer from my old i7 2600k overclocked to 4.2 GHz to this miracle. The performance gain is noticeable, but not everywhere. In the same Battle 5, the whole difference came down to the fact that on Intel the game worked at high and on Ryazan at ultra at 1080p (the video recorder remained the same 1060 6GB). BUT this battle its optimization leaves much to be desired. Tested different games. Old man i7 2600k pulled games 2022-2022. mostly only at high, with ryazan you turn on ultra…

Pros
  • Price/performance ratio.
Cons
  • The boxed cooler is crappy in my opinion. Not in turbo mode at 3.6 GHz per minute in the OSST shows a TDP of 72 degrees, which is not very ok. The desktop is usually around 44-48 degrees. At 4.2 GHz, I won’t even speak there is a complete tin. The almost complete absence of overclocking above 4.2 GHz (which was confirmed even by AMD themselves)