- Good performance, but not high enough frequency for an advanced technical process, in games due to this it is inferior even to overclocked intels on the 2022 first generation socket.
- The lack of overclocking potential and the feeling that the frequency is artificially limited by marketers in order to sell this option in the form of the next generation of processors. In terms of frequency, it is comparable to the overclocked ryzen 7 2700 that I had before it, in terms of performance per core it is also very close to the overclocked 2700, but somewhat colder (by 5-10g depending on the load and no jumps, as they wrote in other reviews), and On the other hand, the voltage jumps higher under load. In terms of price-performance ratio, I liked it less than the Ryzen 7 2700.
- The best Ryazan for such money.
- Why is Lisa Su not my Wife?!)))))
- Price/performance. By right, the people's processor.
- No complaints.
- Price-quality ratio
- They brought the processor with bent legs. So choose your supplier carefully.
- Excellent powerful processor. 6 cores 12 threads.
- Not found
- low price compared to intel. support for a huge number of manufacturers of RAM. ease of overclocking as needed. support on older motherboards.
- slightly gluttonous, but not for everyone this is a minus
- CPU
- came killed in the trash
- There is not
- Quick.
- Quite hot (quite typical for ryzen ), not critical
- Decent performance Good competition from Intel
- Very good performance for gaming, and most importantly for work tasks, subject to the purchase of separate cooling
- Cooling in a boxed version is meaningless and a waste of money. Severe overheating and throttling. Heating moments of 112 degrees in the load.
- - Power. Yes, for its price and if you are looking for functionality NOT only for games - the Ryzen line is generally the best choice for you. - Overclocking potential - yes, it is, if the motherboard allows it, as well as cooling . But more on that later :) - Because of the hype, most motherboards seem to work with the processor in a friendly pair from the box, but such moments are better controlled, on some sites it is taken out as a separate line. - Very smart. Again, very subjective, before that I was already sitting on prehistoric fx 8xxx (no, I didn’t indulge in overclocking, it was just enough). But work even in the simplest tasks, or rather the speed of this work, is just a completely different level, and in games that I even tried with my hardware - which is not very cool, it more than suited me, given that I don’t play super graphic games , maybe I have everything only 1660 (not even Ti or Super). - Still, in specials like video and photo processing, it is a cut above Intel models in the price segment.
- - Temperature. This is not exactly a minus, rather . The consequence of my stupidity. DON'T DARE to take the BOX version with an AMD cooler. At the time of my purchase, the box version costs 1.300 more than the OEM. And, it would seem, it's not expensive, but . It's better to take some DEEPCOOL 400 or PCCOOLER 5 or 6 series. Yes, they cost somewhere more expensive by, well, I don’t know, depending on the model, 300-700 (i. E. 1600 - 2022) and they will cool BETTER. If you don’t want to believe my value judgments, the Internet is full of tests with screenshots, good luck. If you also have a mATX case, but you want a 120 fan, then of course PcCooler is best to take from the tower ones - it has a height of only 148 mm (for series 5, I don’t know for 6). - Among other things, this is probably an option for . Well, I don't know, computer geeks? Probably in most cases, Ryzen will make you play with the BIOS settings, with the processor voltage and the multiplier, which is unlocked here. Plus, in Intel's piggy bank - there, probably, there will be no need to suffer like that. But at the same time, the multiplier is unlocked there only in models with a K indicator at the end - for example, i7 8700k. As if plus in the direction of AMD, but do you need it? It's up to you to think.
- Work to the maximum out of the box. PBO boosts percentages to the maximum. Earned at a memory frequency of 3600 MHz on 14 14 15 32 CR1 on the Asus x370 strix f gaming motherboard.
- Lack of overclocking
- - Accelerates automatically - Good in one thread - Good in multiple streams
- - Stock cooler does not handle heat - You need to ate the bios on old AM4 to make this processor work - Oddities when working with the bios of motherboards
- 6 cores / 12 threads. ~330 gigaflops in Linx. Works on any motherboard socket AM4 after flashing. Works with memory up to 4400 megahertz (tried on v450), there is no difference after 3600 in games, but still. The price, for 13 thousand, is out of competition. Better than 9400f, about equal to 9600k, but colder than both. Cold, even in overclocking fits under 65W coolers
- Weak overclocking, it is very difficult to squeeze more than 4200 MHz for a constant. You need a memory of 3000-3600 MHz, otherwise it drains the steuda) Likes to heat the chipset on the motherboard
- Price Number of cores/threads Zen2 Heat dissipation Infinity Fabric AM4 compatibility
- Price Short life cycle
- + inexpensive + cold
- - not the best performance
- -consider overclocked out of the box - socket AM4, you can not change the motherboard -12 threads
- - inconsistency with the declared 65W - a claim in principle to the mount AM4. It's scary to put a cooler, I put different ones, to snap it into place, you need a strong effort, the board already bends, it's scary
- Price/performance ratio.
- The boxed cooler is crappy in my opinion. Not in turbo mode at 3.6 GHz per minute in the OSST shows a TDP of 72 degrees, which is not very ok. The desktop is usually around 44-48 degrees. At 4.2 GHz, I won’t even speak there is a complete tin. The almost complete absence of overclocking above 4.2 GHz (which was confirmed even by AMD themselves)