Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 66
  • 5
    56
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    6

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very pleased with this purchase, will recommend it to everyone!

The temperature setting is excellent. On Gammax L240-v2 at minimum valve and pump speeds of 40 degrees in simple and non-resource intensive tasks. At medium speeds under the same conditions, it produces 32-34 degrees, at room temperature 26 degrees. As long as 40 degrees for him - the temperature is ridiculous, the revolutions without load are set to a minimum so that there is silence. Under load, it warmed up to 60-65. Turnovers, of course, rose, but quickly fell. Under extreme load, it was…

Pros
  • 12/24 is power. I took it for 31k, for such money you will not find such an offer anywhere. In single thread nose-to-nose with the I9 9900k, in multi-thread far ahead. High energy efficiency - peak consumption in the region of 140 watts. For a 12-core, this is not much. Intel's 8-core eats 220-240. Cold. Under load, it can warm up, but nothing supernatural.
Cons
  • Price? But for a 12-core, the price is great. It was before the crisis hit again.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

I bought this nuclear gun to work in autodesk with subsequent rendering in vegas and for toys too, I didn’t see a load of more than 80%. The price is less than that of a direct competitor with greater performance in work tasks and equal in games. The percentage for 24 threads is cold enough, who says that they are used to cooling their 2-core i3 of 2022 with a tower for 1500 thousand from Alik, and these are 12 cores that require appropriate cooling, the boxed cooler keeps around 80 degrees…

Pros
  • 12/24 threads Huge cache Price Temperature
Cons
  • There is none of them

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the product suited me, the price is generally perfect.

Didn't expect such a performance boost in 3ds max corona rendering. 9 times compared to i7-3770k and 4 times compared to i7-8700. All attempts to disperse led to a drop in speed. Tried it this way and that, nothing reasonable happens. Not so hot as many scared: on noctua d15 at idle 35-37, under load 69-72 . Windows starts longer, not much, 10-12 seconds. I don’t know how it is in games, but for rendering it’s just a mega cool percent. I took it for 34500r, I sold the boxed cooler for 1500r…

Pros
  • Impressive performance. Reasonable, relatively, price.
Cons
  • Doesn't accelerate. It takes a long time to load, compared to Intel, the system. Raw bios.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

Well done AMD, a very suitable stone for professional activities and everyday tasks, including games. We tried to stream and play, everything is fine, I recommend it for these purposes. In terms of work on renders, it significantly exceeds the rendering time of the machine by 8800.9700 , I am silent about the rest. Configuration on B450 chipset. With its pros: In multi-threaded tasks, it is definitely TOP (I can only compare with 9700k and 8800). Single-threaded, if you do not chase a couple of

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

I want to say right away that AMD is "famous" for its dubious product launches and "raw" firmware and drivers at the start. It is possible that all the problems indicated in the shortcomings will disappear over time. Buyers (mostly outside the 2022) are now looking forward to new BIOS versions (and AGESA in particular). As problems disappear / appear, the review will be ated in this comment. I will also write here that this processor does not make much sense for games. If you choose an AMD…

Pros
  • 1) On the motherboard Asus PRIME X570-PRO earned without dancing with a tambourine. No problems with BSOD or other instability. 2) The memory purchased for the system with a frequency of 3733 and CL17 started up without problems with a voltage of 1.44V. Profile DOCP (XMP) did not try, because there is no need. 3) Simple overclocking from under the system itself. 4) Temperatures are normal under 360 AIO Deepcool (I have not seen above 85 yet, at medium-low speeds). 5) Shows himself well in work tasks. In mine - at the level of i9 9920, but at the same time much cheaper.
Cons
  • 1) Acceleration, though simple, but everything is sad with it. At the time of writing, it is almost impossible (even manually) to set the same 4.5GHz and pass a serious test on all cores (with a voltage per core of 1.4V), and frankly speaking, the promised automatic boost to 4.6GHz does not even smell. Overclocking was set to manual, floating on the cores - CCX01 - 4350, CCX02 - 4325, CCX03 and 04 - 4275. Voltage - 1.34. There is a real lack of the ability to set the frequency "abstractly" to 1 working core, to 2, 4, and so on, as on Intel. It is inconvenient to manually select the frequency for each individual core. Plus, it's nearly impossible to overclock one core more while the others are idle.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

1) Top cooling and good thermal paste are shown to him. Despite 7nm. Unless of course the processor will be used for its intended purpose, and not for games. 2) It makes no sense to buy memory with a frequency higher than 3600. There will be no increase, a feature of the architecture. Save money. 3) Many advise buying a good motherboard, but no one has argued why. At least I will sit on an old b350 plus, which I bought for 6 thousand 2 years ago. The performance is completely consistent with…

Pros
  • I will describe from the point of view of the owner of the eight-core ryzen 5 1600x 1) Cheap for owners of older boards with am4. I have a two-year-old mother asus prime b350 plus - the percentage earned on it and there are no problems. Even boosts work. Total upgrade came out the cost of the processor minus the cost of the old processor. Intelovtsy probably should envy, they have no continuity of sockets and generations. 2) Finally, more or less tolerable performance per core. Boost really raises the frequency multiplier of one working core to 4600. This is my second ryzen, but the first one that successfully overcame core i5 2500k@4.5 in single-core calculations 3) In multi-threaded computing, this is a super advantageous offer. Somewhere even faster than a 1950s 16-core threadripper, and such a joy for $440 with the ability to install on an old mother.
Cons
  • 1) Auto-boost, depending on the quality of cooling and the load, when the cooler radiators get clogged with dust, or the thermal paste dries up, it may stop working. A user who has automatic settings may not know that his performance has dropped. The frequency multipliers will just start to drop. Low and unnoticeable. You feel throttling right away, and if the frequency drops from 4000 to, say, 3800, then you may not notice it. 2) Why is he so hot in idle? Even its idle frequency is 2300, unlike the Hong Kong of the first generation, where it was 1400. For many users, I noticed that the processor warms up to 50 degrees in idle time. 3) Manual overclocking may cause performance degradation in some applications. And it always leads to the loss of single-threaded performance. Even seasoned overclockers from well-known sites have confirmed this with their tests. And the heat starts to grow like hell, not in the horse's fodder. So it's better to indulge and forget. This is not one of those stones that were accelerated one and a half times, those times have passed. 4) The boxed cooler can't cope with serious loads. Who thought to buy a percent first, and save money on normal cooling for the first time - figurines. Firstly, it will howl, and secondly, it will heat up to dangerous temperatures. And you will have to decide: reduce the frequency or turn off some of the cores.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I am engaged in software development, android, java. A perfectly balanced processor for these tasks. The software is built quickly, gradle, even with a parallel build, does not load the processor by more than half. Emulators load instantly. In the process of working on all this, a lot of developer time is saved. At first I thought to take 3950, but in the end I realized that for these tasks this is already too much.

Pros
  • Great processor for software development.
Cons
  • Cooling is required, preferably water. With PBO turned on, the temperature can seriously rise to 90+ degrees.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Before that, I used a WORKING RAM from an old computer. 4 sticks of 8 GB. The computer was constantly thrown into the blue screen. I had to change. Achieved stability with Kingston HyperX FURY Black 3200 2pcs x 16. But that's not all. I work with video in Edius 9 video editor and it constantly crashes after 10 minutes of work. The problem turned out to be the voltage of the processor. He gave out 1.49 on the machine. Due to this, the frequency of the processor was walking from 3300 to 4800 on…

Pros
  • The processor is worth the money. I took it in January - February, at a VERY nice price. Together MPG X570 G + , 32 GB of RAM. I am engaged in video editing, I work on EDIUS 9 (by the way, I grabbed a lot of problems with this, more on that in the comments below) I also use AE, Davincy resolve . And of course, I play sometimes. Despite the fact that I have a weak video card GTX 960. Everything flies pretty fast. In addition to editing programs xD Unfortunately, they load the percent by a maximum of 50%. And only EDIUS, when working in 4K and manipulating effects, shows that the percentage is loaded by 90-100%. Before that, he worked on intel 6700. Guys are heaven and earth.
Cons
  • It gets very hot, initially up to 80, a turret or water is a must. I took Noctua NH-D15 with 2 screws. Accordingly, the body had to take a giant. NOW THE FEET ARE CONSTANTLY COLD xD I managed to achieve work at 70 degrees (this is natural in work, in idle time somewhere around 40), I lowered the voltage.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

If you're a casual user with no worries about top performance at all, this processor is just perfect for all everyday tasks. Its power will be enough for a year and a half ahead for sure, while everything now rests in most cases on the video card and the optimization of the game itself. I experienced real delight when I used it at the first stages, because I jumped off the 3600x, it was not enough just these capacities that this processor gave me.

Pros
  • - High performance, allows you to use the video card at 100% of its capabilities for video cards 20xx Nvidia or 5xxx Radeon. - Good render for video in SONY VEGAS, fast rendering of models in 3dmax - Allows you to conduct high-quality streams that are processed by the processor. Full HD + 60 fps + 6600 bit rate without packet loss on most modern games. At the same time, the fps in games sags by about 20%, but I usually don’t have less than 100 fps in games, except that in graphonic ones it’s stable 60 fps when the stream is on - Overclocking is very easy in ryzen master. In the bios, I danced with a tambourine one evening and picked up the ideal characteristics for overclocking - Without streaming, there are no problems with performance, you just play for fun, in this segment it will last another year and a half for sure
Cons
  • - For real-time blue ray quality rendering at 60 fps, it is bent. 5-10% + - frame skip (not a big indicator because it is a very heavy task), although any processor will die here. At the same time, it heats up to 100 degrees in a light one, which is not good, while there is a decent be quiet dark rock pro 4 tower - I'm afraid it won't be enough for modern graphics-based games and at the same time to be able to stream on it in good quality and comfortable games - Gets very hot at high loads, I think to buy a 5900x with dropsy because of this, I assume that this is the trouble of all multi-core processors

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

For overclocking, you should take a more powerful cooler and provide a good airflow through the case. But this is no longer about the BOX version. The backlight is better configured when connected via USB on the motherboard. Through the RGB connector, you can only change the illumination of the impeller (at least from the msi motherboard). But through USB and a special application, the illumination of the impeller, the rings around it and the AMD inscriptions change, and all this separately.

Pros
  • 12 cores 24 threads. Powerful. Frequencies, support for PCI-Express 4.0 (for the future). A beautiful backlit cooler, quite large, not like the bundled Intel coolers. Out of the box with thermal paste.
Cons
  • Mounting the cooler is not very convenient. Heats up nicely. In Assassin's Creed Odyssey up to 85 degrees. Not critical, but could be better. At the same time, there are 3 turntables 140 mm in the case: two for blowing in, one for blowing out. The cooler blows air in all directions, blows the memory, motherboard radiators, video card, ssd m.2.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Took for video editing, sites to do and other things. Since for work that brings income, 40 thousand is not a price, therefore it is not a disadvantage. It’s also suitable for the game, but I wouldn’t advise it, you can take it more efficiently and cheaper, my advice is 8 cores with higher clock purity and performance per core. This processor is still not oriented as a gaming solution.

Pros
  • Powerful
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best product I have ever reviewed, I recommend it to everyone!

For work and graphics applications, this is the best processor for the money! For games, too, an excellent solution, enough groundwork for the future. PS. There is an important nuance of the X570 chipset. Due to the cooling characteristics of X570 motherboards, the video card can additionally heat up the processor. It is better to buy MP of the latest revisions (MSI MEG or analogues), where this cant is fixed. S. After starting, I advise you to immediately ate the BIOS. There is a chance…

Pros
  • + Incredibly powerful. I bought it for rendering, the increase in speed after i7-4790 is about 400%. Instead of 5 minutes renders 1.2 minutes + Not too hot with proper cooling. With the Noctua ND15 tower under maximum load (30 minutes of rendering), no more than 81 degrees. + Works right out of the box without dancing with a tambourine + FPS in games has grown significantly. The accelerator is not at all top-end (RX580), but it has become much more comfortable to play.
Cons
  • - Difficult to load all cores unless it's special applications. In games, I did not notice more than 60% of the load. - Overclocking capabilities are not impressive. Although, the base frequencies are enough for the eyes. - Although compatible with AM4, it is demanding on the motherboard and memory. It is better not to save on this.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I installed the Noctua NH-D15 tower on this percentage, which coped with the temperatures and at room temperature at rest it heats up to about 39-41 degrees, in operation it is about 65-70. Motherboard ASUS prime x570 pro. Got pros: Good processor, I took it at the beginning of summer. box version. I saw frequencies in the region of 4600 MHz, I didn’t specifically drive it. Different cons: Hot, the cooling system had to be changed, fortunately it made sense and the boxed cooler went to my son's

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

Switched from i7-7700K, mainly used in work tasks, 3D modeling, video editing, photography. In 3D, it's just a beast, performance has increased by 4-5 times, video renders 3 times faster. In short, I just get high as everything is fast now. Air cooling copes, the tower is huge, but even with a whole day of 100% load, the temperature is around 80-83. In short, a very cool stone. But it's probably overkill for games.

Pros
  • Fast and productive
Cons
  • I do not observe, except perhaps the price, but compared to competitors it is quite adequate.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

In general, for 33k it was an excellent choice, now it is worth paying attention to the 5000 generation, but it is not clear what will happen to prices and the dollar exchange rate. Different pros: Excellent performance processor. I assembled it to replace the old PC of 2022 on the i5-6600k, which has already begun to rest 100% on games and in work scenarios. I faced the choice of building on intel or amd, but in the end I chose the 12-core 3900x. The performance suits both heavy gaming (AC…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, I advise you to try it.

An excellent choice for your money, but you need to cool it either with water or with a good tower, the idle rate is 4.2 GHz, which gives a good heat boost, manual overclocking does not make sense - there will simply be nothing to cool such a monster. The cooler, which is BOX, rustles even at low speeds, and when it accelerates, a vile squeal is guaranteed. I hope there will be enough capacity for 5-7 years. the motherboard from MSI overestimated the voltage to 1.49, in connection with which…

Pros
  • Availability, power reserve.
Cons
  • heat dissipation, VERY noisy BOX cooler, overclocking.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great performance for less than Intel

I've had the processor for a while, but so far it's been great. My old Ryzen 1700 processor was good, but the 3900x practically doubles its processing power. You might not notice much of a difference in single-threaded applications. You won't notice a big difference until you use it in a program that demands the CPU. It hasn't been used much aside from that and some benchmark tests, but so far it's been about as good as the online reviews say.

Pros
  • One-year trial
Cons
  • Upgradeable