Canon EOS 600D Kit EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, black Review

In general, I am quite happy to have an SLR camera at my disposal. The first time around, everything should be good. Now I'm going to flip to 60 degrees, so let's see how it compares to what:) The benefits of it include: The camera has a comfortable grip and is simple to operate, in addition to producing excellent images. In my opinion, to properly evaluate your first DSLR camera, you should shoot the exact same picture. You will have a general understanding of SLR cameras after completing the…

In general, a solid 4. Very impressive for such a reasonably priced DSLR. It is in your best interest to upgrade to a lens with a focal length of 18-135 rather than 18-55 because the former is a relatively useless focal length. Pictures taken with 18-55 optics will be comparable to those taken with a high-end soap dish, but the latter will be heavier and cost more. And then, should your business expand, the 18-55 will do nothing except collect dust on the shelf, while the 18-135 can be sold for

Has some pros: The camera is good. The internal processing works well enough. With a Canon 18-135 lens, with a HOYA Pro1 Digital 67 mm filter, it suits me perfectly. The battery lasts long enough. Got cons: Not critical. But the overly rounded shape of the left upper part of the case.

I saved. I bought with an 18-55 lens. the first time you can take pictures with him. and very good indeed. quite enough. but for the holidays you need something better Pros: wonderful camera. Takes great pictures in any light. a huge number of settings. did not die even after an hour of continuous shooting in 15 degrees below zero and a snowstorm is the best in this price category. causes a storm of positive emotions Its cons: expensive. a little heavy. it's a pity there is no autofocus…

Just figure out the settings, for beginners there are auto and creative modes. Well, for the pros - a lot of modes. I have nothing to compare with, before that there was a SONY DSC soap dish. A good camera, take only from authorized dealers. Pros: I liked the camera, the shooting speed was important in order to shoot a nimble child. With its cons: It broke after a month of use (factory marriage) - during serial shooting, I began to take black photos. Passed under warranty, within 45 days they…

I've been using it for less than a week and I'm quite happy with it. For beginners, it is very convenient to use, although it is worth "training on cats" for a start. I shoot mostly in manual mode, I try, so to speak, different options. Pros: - Possibility to change formats - Takes great pictures in a dark room - Convenient interface, there is also MY MENU, where you can put the parameters you need - Good built-in flash Different cons: - Focuses for a long time in a dark room…

Very happy with the camera! Tip: when purchasing a SLR camera, learn how to use it, otherwise it turns into a "soap box" in auto mode. With its pros: The battery charge is enough for more shots than stated in the instructions. Good video quality. Having hints is an incredibly useful feature for beginners. Swivel screen. Good value for money! Has cons: The included lens is rather weak, but for beginners it will do.

Perhaps the best amateur camera, for the year that she never let me down, she withstood both rain and snow. all photos were taken on Canon EOS 600D Some pros: Well assembled, comfortable ergonomics, you quickly get used to the buttons, for beginners you will not find better. Cons below: Auto focus smears on fast optics, a small viewfinder, it’s uncomfortable to hold in your hand when you put on a heavy lens and a flash, noise at 400 iso and loss of detail, few focus points, only 1 cross type,

at the beginning I was a little disappointed, but then when I gained a little experience, the photos began to turn out better and now I am very pleased that I purchased this model) I advise everyone to you too) Different pros: Swivel LCD display, it is very convenient to shoot with outstretched hands, the menu is convenient, the quality of the photos is excellent, it takes great pictures in sunny weather, the whale lens sometimes fails, it is too dark, I do not advise taking pictures at home in

Used the camera for about a year. During this time, no complaints. The swivel screen often helped out. The perfect camera for the beginner photographer

Now my six hundredth has a mileage of about 15,000 photos, and during all this time he refused only once, and even that is not significant, he did not want to lower the mirror! Got pros: 1. The screen is beautiful! About 170 degrees on all sides 2. Ergonomics, often dropped, saved by a protruding handle, for which I caught 3. Noise reduction, you can take pictures literally, at any values ​​​​(12800 I do not advise, but you can) 4. Flash, I don’t use it, but it’s good, checked 5…

After the soap dish (albeit partially with manual settings) I am very pleased with the camera. Even on the machine it gives good shots, and if you set the settings manually, it cancompe with difficultcomnditions. I use two lenses, a kit lens and a Canon 70-300 telephoto lens. There are some photos here ? Pros below: Everyone is very satisfied. This is the first SLR camera, I figured it out without problems, when using it, only positive emotions :) Its cons: It's not very convenient that the…

A good camera for beginners with a kit lens. as soon as a little money appears, you immediately need to take a fix, even a simple 50 1.8 and a zoom of 50-250 tocomver all sides of the photo at the minimumcomst. I bought it as a gift for my daughter and sometimes I take pictures myself. I have a Fujik s2500 soap dish and,compared to it, canon takes pictures much more realistically, especially people, and it’s also verycomnvenient to scale and enlarge photos in photo processing, since it has a…

I took a carcass complete with an 18-135 lens. Later I bought 50 mm in the same place. This pleasure cost 36,000. I took everything else in China, the quality is the same, since January 2022 everything is working fine. 5in1 reflector, lens hoods for two lenses, cleaning kit for sensor and lens, YN-468-II for Canon flash, 4 AA batteries for flash, 67 mm polarizing filter, spare battery LP-E8, battery pack, 20x25 mini softbox for flash, photo backpack with two compartments and an insert for a…

I like to take pictures instantly when I press the shutter on and the shutter is released. But this is how the device works when the screen is off through the viewfinder. And the 16 to 9 format shoots only when the screen is on, when you switch to the viewfinder, it shoots 4 to 3, despite the fact that in the settings 16 to 9. It turns out that when shooting through the screen from the moment the shutter on is pressed and the shutter is released, 1- 2 seconds, like on soap dishes! Who cares…

The 600D carcass is a solid and promising device. Since it is positioned as an amateur, many features are missing at the software level. I installed the Magic Lantern software on my camera, thanks to which the functionality of the already rather sophisticated camera greatly expanded (brief review: -to-functionality-mirror-camera/). If you need tracking focus, take the EOS 650D. But I myselfcomnsider this bells and whistles (as well as the touchscreen) to be dubious. You take a camera for…

Initially chose between 60D, 650D and 600D. The first one did not like the large weight and a lot of extra ons in my opinion. The second one is more geared towards video shooting and is suiously missing from the official canon website. As a result, I took the 600D, which I am glad about. I've been using it for a month and this is what I can say: 1. Fotik loves the sun and a stable surface. 2. When shooting handheld, you need to take 5-7 photos at a time, one will be more or less clear. 3…

They gave it almost a year ago, it wascommpletely new. I wanted 60d, and aftercommparing both models, I realized that I like 60d more in terms of characteristics. But I fell in love with my mirror so much. no others are needed)) Bought with National Geographic bag: . Pl/1024x0/4/e/torba_naramienna_national_geographic_NG_W2140_per_2057091784. Jpg beautiful duet) I planned to take a lens, not a whale one, in the region of 15-20 thousand, but at the planning stage everything is over so far, I

It's better to see once. Photos with a KIT lens here are daytime: ? p=0 there are shots taken in poor lighting on a gray St. Petersburg morning and at night: ? &p=1 Here is the Canon EF 75-300 f / 4-5.6 III telephoto: ? page=4 KIT: ? page=4#preview And again a telephoto: ? page=4#preview

As a workhorse for reporting and photo hunting, it is indispensable. For everyday life, due to the size and slow focusing on the screen, itcommpletely loses to mirrorless ones. The optical viewfinder is good for working with autofocus lenses, but with manual lenses you need an electronic one with picking and a magnifying glass. The difference in output between RAW and JPG is visible to the naked eye - for an advanced user this is not a problem, but for a beginner it is notcomnvenient. Sample…