Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 35
  • 5
    25
  • 4
    7
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Simply put, a high-quality camera. It came out better than a DSLR for my needs (reportage shooting of big gatherings), and the reason for this is that it has a wide aperture, which means that there is less noise by an entire stop! Especially considering that it can be carried in your pocket. Yet the G7 Mark II would be a better choice (the lens is quicker and more fr), and we would gladly switch to that model if given the opportunity. This camera exceeds a DSLR when it comes to portrait…

Pros
  • Everything will be judged based on how well it compares to the Canon 650D DSLR. There are cameras in both locations. 1. A one-inch matrix display with a backlight! 2. When compared to a DSLR (650d), it only lags behind in noise by one stop (do not confuse a step with a stop), which means that ISO800 produces the same amount of noise as ISO1600 for a DSLR. compared using a variety of ISO settings. But the matrix is only a quarter of its original size! 3. The compact camera has an aperture ratio of f2, whereas the DSLR (with a whale) has an aperture ratio of f3.5; this means that the compact camera is two stops lighter. Hence, if you use ISO800 on an SLR camera (when photographing a whale), ISO200 should be sufficient here (checked)! To put it another way, given the same conditions, the compact will have a lower level of noise. 4. That was an outstanding video! The noise is far lower compared to a DSLR with a whale. 5. We have the acronym RAV. 6. You have a wonderful white balance. To clarify, white is white; it is not yellow or yellowish in any way. 7. There are a variety of environments.
Cons
  • 1. The video can be watched in a short amount of time. Just ten minutes at 50r. Around the 25r mark, I made a recording of 25 minutes. However, the company asserts that the process takes only 29 minutes! I swapped out the memory card. 2. As the aperture is increased up to f4, the loss of sharpness becomes more pronounced. The score for f5,6 is already lower. 3. On the body position f4,9, which indicates that sharpness has already begun to decrease and a large depth of field, which indicates that the background almost does not blur. 4. Zoom in only three times. 5. It has a tendency to increase the ISO on the machine. Either I could restrict it to ISO800, which is an acceptable setting, or I could manually set it. 6. The distortion caused by the Chamber Jeep. It is recommended to shoot in RAW format. It is my recommendation that you switch off all electrical improvers because they simply deteriorate over time and become increasingly difficult to remove. 7. Does not have good focus when the body is in the position and the lighting is dim. 8. Video sometimes loses focus. 9. A faint flash with a prominent yellow. 10. Batteries can be quite pricey. China is a blessing in this world. 12. Cannot be charged directly from a micro USB port or a portable battery pack.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am one hundred percent satisfied with the purchase, I recommend this product to everyone.

The photograph is used as a "bike reportage," which means that when you are riding, you quickly pull a bike jersey or jacket out of your pocket and poke somewhere else, and there is a good probability that you will receive a picture that you can look at for yourself and present to other people. The same can be said for a little bit of canoeing and cross-country skiing. What modes are available, and can manual adjustments be made when there is nothing else to do? The S120 was the previous camera

Pros
  • Check out the application in the discussion below. Dimension/weight. Weight/dimension. when the image quality reaches a particular threshold. Great in Auto mode. Quick start. Great stabilization. The appropriate overlays that provide you a tight grip on the device even in precarious circumstances (hello to Sony goons). LCD display with touch screen. Tyk-focus is an invaluable asset. Charging is done using a USB port (if there is a charger in the package), which enables you to score an extra point. battery. Dedicated button to start recording. When compared to ryka, the price is competitively priced (with the same touch).
Cons
  • Not enough panoramic photos available. There are no censored words that adequately describe the scenario with this functionality, and I have no idea what is going through the management' heads or what the engineering and patent issues are.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

The photo is used as a "bike reportage": on the go, quickly grab a bike jersey / jacket from your pocket and poke somewhere there and with a high chance of getting a picture that you can see for yourself and show to others. The same goes for cross-country skiing and a bit of canoeing. What modes, manual adjustment - on halts, when there is nothing to do. The previous camera for this purpose is the S120, which ended its life cycle, having probably circled the globe in a few years. Knowledge in…

Pros
  • Read the application in the comments. Dimension/weight. Weight/dimension. At a certain level of image quality. Excellent in Auto mode. Fast start. Excellent stabilization. Right overlays that allow you to securely hold the device in dubious situations (hello to Sony goons). Touch screen. Tyk-focus is priceless. Charging via USB (if there is a charger included), which allows you to score on extra. battery. Dedicated record button. Reasonable price in comparison with ryksa (with the same touch).
Cons
  • Lack of panoramic photography. I don’t know what is in the minds of managers or what are the engineering and patent problems, but there are no censorship words for the situation with this feature.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

Only when you take it in your hands, you realize how tiny it is. It feels like you are holding a reduced toy copy of a real camera of the last century. I immediately ordered a leather wardrobe trunk in the style of the 70s of the last century in one color with inserts on Ali. Tactile sensations in terms of the degree of lamp pleasantness can only be compared with when, in childhood, I held a small engine from the GDR railway.

Pros
  • Small, very small. Not any smartphone, even the most ultra-mega-giga-super-nano trendy, expensive and modern on a 100500 megapixel matrix and 100500 lenses, at least slap on all sides, did not even stand close with photographs of this kid. I’m not talking about the rate of fire at all, smartphones can be buried. Matrix BSI technology is just some kind of magic and real magic. All the manual settings of a professional camera are present, plus a bunch of automatic modes, optical zoom and stabilization, just a little monster.
Cons
  • Small, very small, you are always afraid that it will slip out of your hands. Still, the folding screen means a lot when shooting, when you get used to using it, you have to wean it with difficulty. Far focus is a bit dark, still 4.9. They write that the battery capacity is small, I agree. Buy another battery or carry a power bank with you if 300-400 frames per session is not enough for you.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

I was completely taken aback by the apparatus. It seemed impossible. Such high-quality images in any environment, whether it be outside or indoors, bright or cloudy - he always finds the most appropriate conditions and creates an excellent shot. I attempted to tinker with the settings, but whatever I did, it always came out worse than when it was set to automatic. There is a super function that gives users the ability to focus on any object within the frame. This can be used, for example, to…

Pros
  • The standard of image capture achieved when shooting in automated mode. Producing to a high standard. Quick start. In addition to a touch screen.
Cons
  • Because of its diminutive size, it is awkward to hold in one's palm. Because the cover of the battery compartment is so flimsy, it needs to be removed in order for a conventional device to be able to charge it (not a problem, because it is available for charging via USB). A little battery. Menu with a lot of options. There are hardly any shooting modes that are pre-set (although, this device does not really need them).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I have a canon 5 D Mark III camera and there is no need to explain how much it weighs together with optics, you can break your back. And here is this little girl who can take just wonderful photos. Before that, I had and have Sony and Panasonic compacts, but none of them coped so well with complex and low lighting, and even for that kind of money. On vacation, I took pictures only with this camera and was very pleased. Tenacious autofocus, high-quality optics, the possibility of manual…

Pros
  • Decided to rewrite my review. So I actively used the camera for half a year. The first and most important advantage is the quality of photography and the ability to manually adjust the camera. The settings, by the way, are so extensive that they made it possible to shoot the most complex scenes with difficult lighting or with a lack of lighting. The second is the ability to quickly upload photos to your phone via bluetooth for further placement on instagram, for example. By the way, the camera itself has the ability to create various special effects, which simplifies the task of giving photographs the appropriate atmosphere or mood. The third important advantage is the size, which allows you to carry the camera everywhere and always and, if necessary, put it into action. The fourth advantage concerns the owners of Canon photographic equipment, who do not have to understand the menu, because it is the same as in other models. The fifth advantage is the touch screen, which allows you to quickly switch between different shooting modes and camera characteristics without switching to the menu.
Cons
  • The main disadvantage that I encountered is perhaps the disadvantage associated with the battery capacity. The camera was discharged pretty quickly with not the most active work with it, so I bought an external battery, which I very quickly recharged or charged the camera and thus could take pictures of it all day without fear.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturers assurances, high quality.

A very worthy item. Small, but with great potential. When viewed on a computer, the image scale was increased from 23% to 180% - almost without loss of clarity. So a 3x zoom is enough. Its pros: Very decent photo quality in auto mode. A very decent image stabilizer. Compact, does not slow down. Shooting both outdoors and indoors (museums) simply surprised with the quality. By the way - the battery lasted for 800 shots (sJPEG). At the same time, most of the pictures were taken in air at low…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item was good, I'll recommend it to my friends.

This device is worth its money, especially considering that it is physically produced in Japan. The level of image quality of this camera is very good, considering its physical dimensions, weight and price. Dimensions allow you to carry it without problems, which cannot be said about any "SLR". You can talk as much as you like about the advantage of SLR cameras, but it is the small dimensions of the device that allow it to become a full-fledged "life partner". Well, you won’t carry a large…

Pros
  • Low noise level. A fairly clear picture, even in low light. The color rendition is very accurate, after the old Sonya, even somehow boring ((. She very carefully embellished reality. Automatic shooting, the wave works satisfactorily, the response speed is high. The video is very satisfactory, given the class of equipment.
Cons
  • The lens needs improvement. Very much overdid it with the angle of capture. The image is stretched along the edges. Vertical lines along the edges - "fall apart". To avoid problems, you have to slightly move the zoom. This is perhaps the most important problem. Using wireless image transfer is inconvenient. Communication algorithm, software - non-intuitive. I think 9 out of 10 users will not use this function, but will use the "lace". Physiologically, the grip "under the arm" is uncomfortable. Confidently using one hand will not work. Very often, when holding, you touch the touch screen. According to the subjective feeling, it would be better if it was not touch. It is possible that ladies with small hands will find it easier.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very pleased with this purchase, will recommend it to everyone!

Basically a good camera. For my needs (reportage shooting of mass events), it came up better than a DSLR, because it has a large aperture and therefore less noise by a whole stop! Especially since it fits in your pocket. But it would be better to take the g7 mark II (the lens is faster and more fr) and would gladly change to it. Of course, with fast lenses and portrait shooting, a DSLR outperforms it, but compared to a kit lens, this camera is superior to a DSLR, only the flash is weaker. By…

Pros
  • Everything will be in comparison with the Canon 650D DSLR. There are both cameras. 1. Matrix 1 inch with back light! 2. In comparison with a DSLR (650d), it is only one stop behind in noise (do not confuse a step), that is, ISO800 makes noise like ISO1600 for a DSLR. Compared on different ISO. But the matrix is ​​2.8 times smaller! 3. The aperture ratio at a wide angle is f2, while the DSLR (with a whale) has f3.5, that is, the compact is two stops lighter. So, where you put ISO800 on a SLR (with a whale), ISO200 is enough here (checked) ! That is, under equal conditions, there will be less noise on the compact. 4. Great video! Much less noise than a DSLR with a whale. 5. There is RAV. 6. Excellent white balance. That is, white is white, not yellow or yellowish. 7. There are many settings.
Cons
  • 1. The video does not take long. At 50r only 10 min. At 25r I recorded 25 minutes. But the manufacturer claims from 29 minutes! Changed memory cards. 2. Working aperture up to f4, sharpness drops more. f5,6 is already worse. 3. On the body position f4,9, which means that sharpness is already falling and a large depth of field, that is, the background almost does not blur. 4. Zoom only 3x. 5. On the machine, it tends to lift the ISO. I had to limit it to ISO800 (acceptable) or set it manually. 6. Chamber Jeep gives distortion. It's better to shoot in RAW. I advise you to turn off all electronic improvers, they only spoil and then it is difficult to pull out. 7. Does not focus well in the body position in dim lighting. 8. Video sometimes loses focus. 9. Weak flash and strong yellow. 10. Expensive batteries. Thankfully there is China. 12. Does not charge directly from microusb and power banks.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but the product was pleasantly surprised.

What Canon has historically been good at doing: small fast lenses and quality inks. Has some pros - Excellent sharpness; - Color rendition: you can shoot in jpeg with well-chosen bb and color simulation; - Focus ring / everything else; - Branded canon screws-waves with concentric circles, sit firmly; — Lens in metal; - The built-in filter compensates for shutter speed restrictions (up to 1/2022 in total - this is not very much, but there is a filter!); - Focusing and Shuttering - the ability to

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad buy, well worth the money.

I bought it for work (taking pictures of goods), I am satisfied with the device, interesting bokeh at the edges and blur like on a DSLR with an open aperture. Pictures are bright and clear. There are few settings, for example, there is no landscape mode, but there is an M mode. The battery lasts very well, lasts a long time.

Pros
  • small size, comfortable shape, non-slip, fits well in the hand
Cons
  • could not set up the transfer of images via wi-fi

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Feel free to buy, for such a price, the quality is simply amazing.

Simple, clear menu. Convenient for travel and travel. Some pros: Convenient, compact, photo and film - high amateur quality, easy to use Different cons: The Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II has a short zoom range compared to its Sony DSC HX-90 counterpart. Expensive

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

I use it as a digital camera for trips where it is problematic to drag a full-size DSLR with several lenses. You can adjust manually, but in auto mode it gives a good result. For home and amateur use - ideal.

Pros
  • Price-quality ratio. All necessary settings are available. Compact, lightweight, decent photo quality.
Cons
  • For me - no.