Photo camera Canon PowerShot SX240 HS, black Review

I bought this camera to replace my Canon PowerShot A710IS, the old camera has worked its 5.5 years. I wanted to enjoy new technologies. Got pros: Compared to the Canon PowerShot A710IS, the shooting speed has increased significantly. Has some cons: I did not see any difference in photo quality compared to the Canon PowerShot A710IS, I was disappointed, it turns out I spent money for nothing. Video shooting is not of interest, there is a high-quality video camera 1080p-50.

At the moment I'm using the SX220hs model. I'm thinking about buying this device, ating it, so to speak. I would like to know if there are any differences between these two models? If there are, which ones?

It beats its pricecommpletely, a good soap dish for every day. A minimum of marriage during the operation of the "machine", so it is suitable for beginners, and in skillful hands you can get very interesting shots) Examples of photos here - ? p=0 With its pros: High-quality assembly and case materials, convenient control of functions. You can get photos of very good quality, enough sharpness, good work of optical zoom and stabilization, it is quite possible to trust the work of the "automatic".

Great "soapbox" with great potential. Keep the power and capture buttons away from moisture. Its pros: 1. MOV H.264(Full HD) 1920 x 1080, 24 fps with stereo sound - great quality on LCD TV screen 2. Metal body good build quality, nice to hold, made in Japan. 3. Optical zoom 20 4. Very good quality photos in automatic mode, JPEG compression, possible sizes: 4:3 - (L) 4000 x 3000/ 16:9 - (L) 4000 x 2248/ 3:2 - (L) 4000 x 2664/ 1:1 - (L) 2992 x 2992 5. Shooting mode "M" - the ability to manually…

I chose and searched for a good camera for a very long time, I liked this one the most. I took it as a novice photographer, for a while in order to practice. But after acomuple of months I decided to use this miracle again! I take it with me almost every day, it fits easily in my pocket, I rarely use video, so the charge is enough for 2 days (not incomntinuous use, ofcomurse). (! ) But I advise you to charge it often, when the battery is almost empty, the quality of the pictures deteriorates…

Of the dozen models in the store, I chose it, taking pictures from each, it seemed that he was the best of the assortment, while I think that I was not mistaken, I am satisfied with everything, If you need a device that makes 90 clear shots out of 100, pleasing to the eye, almost no blur clicks, the picture is bright and clear even at dusk, then take it, you won’t regret it, it’s always with me in my bag, always at hand, it’s not a shame to post photos for review even after photo shoots with…

I advise you to take it, you will not regret it. Pros: I won’t say that it’s an excellent device, but overall it’s good. There are no ideal things. It satisfies my needs. , white balance, - will get quite good photos (judging by the reviews, the photos are better than the 260th model). Different cons: Weak battery (I solved this issue by acquiring an additional Power plant for 165 grams - it lasts longer than the complete one by 20-25%); there is a slight distortion at the edges, but this is a…

Bought today. I immediately played enough in all modes, comparing the toy with the recently deceased Canon G7. The results exceeded expectations, a very pleasant device for family use. If you do not set before him tasks worthy of a DSLR, then he justifies his appointment. Oooo happy! Pros: Excellent color rendition, photos are bright, saturated. For such a wick with a tiny matrix, wonderful shots in low light. Fast autofocus An excellent stabilizer - at 80x magnification from hand in a room…

I bought this camera specifically for shooting video blogs on YouTube, so FULL HD is a huge plus. Auto-focus is perfect. I shoot at home without additional lighting. On the street, captivates by the fact that he quickly took it out of his pocket, pressed the button and shoot. Very light in weight and in use. Filmed at a ski resort, rolling down the mountain, no problem. Photographs bright, beautiful and clear. Several timer functions, i. E. You can take a picture of yourself on a timer…

I went shopping for a long time and many consultants advised this camera, not expensive and good to use. Take it, you won't regret it

I took it in October 2022 to work with billboards on the highway and shoot catalogs-notebooks of grocery stores, the price is not small, but the camera is worth its money. I really liked him. I put 4 stars because of the price, tricky charging, tight mode wheel. Everything is perfect for fast 3-tap and 2-tap shooting in different conditions and long distances. In sunny weather, a billboard with its text will take a picture from 200 meters without a tripod. And before going hunting, I always…

before that there were Panasonic, I don’t remember which model, there is no video of medium quality and no zoom when shooting video, but what kind of sound quality was in it, at least record discs from concerts, there was also Sony dssh 200xs (I regretted selling it several times) it seemed to be called that , so there is a video (not many camcorders can shoot like that) and the photo was much, better than on this camera . to take or not to take, think for yourself, guess for yourself, I would

A good compact camera) Fits in almost all women's handbags, if desired, you can even fit in a clutch bag) Before that, the camera was twice as large, and the zoom was less (only 6x). I was looking for exactly this one - small, light, but with a large zoom, because 6x was not enough) And, of course, with good quality. I found what I was looking for) Even at 20x zoom, the image quality is good) Although, in general, compared to the previous Canon PowerShot A650 IS camera, the quality seemed a…

Before that, I had a Samsung. So, canon's photos are better. But Samsung's videos are better! By the way, I do not consider the unusual location of the flash to be a disadvantage. After all, the farther from the lens, the better! You just need to get used to it. If you only need to take pictures, then the device will do. But if it's for video, it's definitely not suitable! Surprising even that such a disgusting sound on the video. In this regard, I am disappointed. For the price, you could…

My husband and I chose for a long time. At first we wanted to take the Samsung WB100, then the Nikon Coolpix L820, in the end we chose the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and did not regret it at all. We carefully read the reviews from many sites about these cameras (already my head was spinning), we realized that there is much less negativity about the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS, although of course there will always be opposite opinions. The decisive thing was that people wrote that even in low light (

Good device. Wouldn't recommend for beginners. In my opinion, it is ideal for staged shooting when there is time to rebuild the frame. The price, in my opinion, is still too high for this device. I still don’t understand who the manufacturer is all the same (Japan is written on the box, which I strongly doubt) With its pros. Clear shots indoors, in low light, at dusk, excellent shooting in macro mode, good optics and stabilizer (100% cope with their task). Lots of manual settings. High-speed…

I love Canon in general and the powershot series in particular. This unit was taken to replace the 130th of 2 considerations. I wanted a lens with a larger zoom (in both directions) and a device with a built-in battery. Pentagon batteries are good for long trips in nature - charge them as much as you need and shoot for a month. But for "operational work", that is, constant wearing around the city, this is not so hot as it is convenient. As a result, I got almost what I wanted. Branded Canon…

I have been using it for half a year, I am very satisfied, because I also bought a Japanese assembly for half the price from a friend. Immediately take a spare battery if you shoot a lot of video, because when shooting a video, the battery drains before your eyes. (I’ll run into the front that 280 is even faster, there is a Dizhik 6 percent (and 60 frames per second) If only taking pictures is enough for a long time. Here, as it seemed to me, the auto mode works very well, the pictures are…

I bought this device as a camera for every day. The priority in choosing was the design, large zoom, manual settings, compactness, ergonomics, and of course the quality of the pictures, having the Nikon D90, is quite picky about the quality. I never shoot on the machine, I like to set the parameters myself. Comparing with a DSLR is at least stupid, especially with such a monster as the D90. I love my Nikon, no complaints about it, gold is just . but using it every day is both a pity and…

Let's summarize: 1) Excellent photo quality 2) Just super video quality at a resolution of 1920x1080+ there is SlowMotion (a cool thing) 3) Very fast (photography and focus speed) and many interesting options 4) Very good battery 5) well, actually the aforementioned cons Are you thinking about taking it or not? TAKE and you won't regret it. For its price and for the totality of all the minuses and pluses, a solid 5+