Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
fujifilm x-t30 kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 r lm ois, black logo

Fujifilm X-T30 Kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS, black Review

5

·

Poor

Revainrating 3 out of 5  
Rating 
2.8
Automotive, 💡 Car Lights & Lighting Accessories, 🚨 Warning & Emergency Lights, 💡 Car Lights & Lighting Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(16)
img 1 attached to Fujifilm X-T30 Kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS, black
img 2 attached to Fujifilm X-T30 Kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS, black
img 3 attached to Fujifilm X-T30 Kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS, black
img 4 attached to Fujifilm X-T30 Kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS, black

Description of Fujifilm X-T30 Kit 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS, black

The FUJIFILM X-T30 differs from the X-T3 in a lighter and more compact body with similar shooting performance. It features the same AF system with phase-detection shooting area, nearly 100% frame coverage, high-speed continuous shooting up to 30 fps without fading, monochrome toning, color-chromic effect and sports viewfinder mode, as well as modes for amateur photographers, including Advanced SR Auto. This mirrorless "Little Giant" delivers top-notch image quality at a more affordable price.

Reviews

Global ratings 5
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A normal product, but they wanted more for the money.

My opinion is that the camera is of high quality because it produces excellent video. But there are also a number of drawbacks, which may or may not be major concerns for different people.

Pros
  • Appearance, independence, and the effects on film
Cons
  • Disgusting software. Simply awful, and there is no easy access to the menu items. It's annoying that there are always problems connecting via wi-fi to a smartphone, if you managed to connect there are freezes. The lens has a very black appearance. Both the photos and the movies are quite on the dark side. Even post-processing doesn't help. The asking price is quite exorbitant. The red price need to be somewhere about sixty thousand, and no higher. Additionally, holding it is not a pleasant experience. In the beginning, there was a problem with the lens, but it was fixed for free because it was still under warranty. The silver case is beautiful, but the paint peels off, shrinks very quickly. There is insufficient optical stabilization present. Without the use of a tripod or a separate stabilizer, your films will all have a jerky appearance no matter what you do.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but it was a pleasant surprise.

These are merely initial thoughts because I've only been buying for a few days so far. After learning about the limitations of the standard whale lens, I decided to seek for and photograph 81 thousand whales with an enhanced version of the 18-55mm lens. The overall sentiments are complicated. To begin with, it seemed that the Nikon D750 / 24-120 shoots better (it costs, of course, is also more expensive: 106 thousand as opposed to 81 thousand), but rather, the point here is simply that the full

Pros
  • Integration with mobile devices such as smartphones and other such devices. Particularly convenient is the capability of extracting the precise time and geolocation from a mobile device, such as a smartphone. Something that some manufacturers who produce additional GPS modules for the sole purpose of making more money are woefully lacking. In comparison to DSLRs, these cameras are lightweight and more compact. High speed shooting in a continuous fashion. Numerous settings, each with a degree of adaptability. On the control dials, the most important parameters are organized for quick access. The autofocus performs really nicely. A multitude of contemporary technologies, including support for facial recognition, BT, and Wi-Fi, amongst others. The USB Type-C interface is capable of both transferring files and charging devices. It's true, but not very quick. On the other hand, this makes it simple to attach an external battery of any size that is practical.
Cons
  • It is not sufficient to use aperture with an 18-55 lens. My primary camera, a Nikon D750 / 24 - 120, is somewhat heavy (1600 grams with a lens, a belt, and memory cards), but even this 1:4 lens shoots significantly better in low-light environments. This is because the much bigger physical size of the lens affects (and perhaps matrices) the exposure. Using the same 18-55 lens barrel, vignetting is very apparent while shooting at small focal lengths. Even if more sophisticated editors will likely correct all of this once or twice, the fact that it still needs to be corrected is still an annoyance. The zoom ring on the lens is a little bit difficult to turn. There is not a separate charger for the battery. On the other hand, in light of the fact that the conventional charging port is a USB Type-C port, this is not as important. The Wi-Fi standard is now considered to be archaic. There has been no mention of any speeds between 200 and 1000 Mbps. It is highly possible that this is the reason why, despite all the benefits of a mobile application, I was unable to locate an opportunity to send a photo into a smartphone without it being compressed. Even with Nikon, albeit only through a single location, this may be accomplished with a single piece. 12-15 seconds for each every photo. It would take considerably longer here considering the average "weight" of a photo, which is between 25 and 30 megabytes (in high quality JPEG format). Consolation, but a very fast USB port, so I use two cords: Type-C - Type-C (for a smartphone - I rapidly download all photographs and videos in Google Photo), and the typical USB - Type-C for a computer that is supplied, it is both a charger and data cable. Both of these cords are included. It is quite unfortunate for people who wish to shoot video since not only is there a strict time limit on how long the video can be (Full HD videos can only be 15 minutes long, and 4K videos can only be 10 minutes long), but also the overheating of the device that occurs when shooting video frequently causes the camera to shut off right in the middle of the filming process. A speedy test revealed that a cold 4K camera overheats to a "stop" in approximately 23-25 minutes, whereas a FullHD camera passed out right away without waiting 15 minutes, despite the fact that the camera was already heated when the shooting began. In general, the video quality here is quite poor, and the photo quality is not significantly worse than that of the more advanced camera in the range.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting, will never recomend it for anybody!

Picked up a camera for travel. The small size of Fuji made me try this model in action. In the English segment of the Internet, reviews are mixed, but the majority still like the XT30. I liked the idea that Fuji has a lot of lenses (didn't like the fact that the price was inadequate). I did not like the fact that the photo quality of the Fuji XT30 and XT3 on DPReview is simply terrifying. I decided to borrow this camera from a friend in order to understand during use what is true and what is a

Pros
  • - Video capabilities.
Cons
  • - Incompatibility with Lightroom. - Terrible photo quality. - Terrible ergonomics. - Lack of a touch screen in the menu.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, a pleasure to use.

I wanted to change the camera for a long time, I decided for a very long time and thought that it was better to take . fujifilm - ❤️ With its pros: The quality of the photo is insanely clear, the colors are natural (with all the undertones) - the way you see with your eyes, and the frames themselves resemble a movie shot, incredibly aesthetically pleasing! It is impossible not to note the weight of the camera, taking it with you is a pleasure! During shooting, nothing squeezes the neck, like a…

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is absolutely worthless, don't buy it.

If I knew that fuji would give so much freedom to picking the photographer in the settings, I didn’t even look in the direction of this company, I want to take pictures and get shots, and not squeeze another half liter of milk out of a tortured goat, with the factory settings the picture is empty, you start to set up at least something - Everything, the device can be thrown away. I consider all the successful pictures of any user with this carcass to be a coincidence and an accident, this is…

Pros
  • beautiful, but stupid as a felt boot
Cons
  • so: you have an accordion with piano keys in your hands, or if you want a bagpipe with a bunch of built-ins, there are a lot of them and you don’t need them all. You will not be able to just point and take a picture, first you will do preliminary caresses to this device, but while you are doing it, everything will change, from the object to the weather, and possibly the season. On the other hand, everyone around will admire the beauty of the device, but you will not be able to photograph this admiration, because you will set it up again and again and again . While even any modern camera phone will take a quick and interesting shot without foreplay in the settings.