Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 66
  • 5
    28
  • 4
    26
  • 3
    9
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

I use this lens with a canon eos 1100D and am completely satisfied. The lens is universal, focal lengths are enough for all occasions of everyday life. Anyone who points out flaws should understand that all budget lenses have flaws. But if you know the weaknesses, then there will be no bad photos. Read reviews and lens tests and use the experience of professionals.

Pros
  • - 18-135 - autofocus does not blur - quality - price
Cons
  • with skillful use, they will not

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

Guys! Don't listen to anyone! In this price range, you can't get better than Canon. Can be gained but lost; can be neglected and received, but this is the perfect combination of price and quality. Those who write "it's dark indoors without a flash" are just a dumbass who can't expose correctly. Those who write that he "soaps at the long end" simply forgot to turn off the stub when shooting from a tripod. I shot the moon with him (!) despite the fact that he clearly lacks FR. I just took a point

Pros
  • absolutely
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

After 28-300, of course, it’s not enough, but everything beyond 135 is not so important for me. I don't do photography. Before buying, I used tests and comparisons with both whale and more advanced lenses, which are quite enough posted on the Internet. Also used reviews on the market. The photos from this lens pleased: sharp, high-quality, I haven’t seen any critical moments yet. For home use and as a first zoom lens, the best option.

Pros
  • Qualitatively assembled, on the fotik stands like a glove, not heavy. Fast focusing, sharpness is quite enough for home use, if not photo-hunting, then 18-135 is quite enough for both nature and portraits. Price!
Cons
  • Not for this money.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

when buying, I compared it with Canon 17-85 for a long time, the latter seemed less sharp and more flimsy in design. I won’t say that I was delighted with the purchase, but this is the best that was on that day for that kind of money. used by me only for shooting landscapes, for portrait shooting (for me) is not suitable at all. for a year of use, dust has not accumulated and the trunk does not leave, as many users complain. coupled with the advantages I have described and turning a blind eye…

Pros
  • good spread of focal lengths, which gives a lot of opportunities when shooting; silently and quickly focuses; reliable design; quite sharp for the money, however, with a focal length of more than 24 mm; does not miss; did not notice any accumulation of dust
Cons
  • very, very dark, impossible to use in the dark and almost impossible to use in poor lighting; an extremely noticeable barrel at a wide angle (well, these are already optical distortions, which will still have to be corrected at any wide angle); a little chromate; 18-24 mm lathers, which makes it impossible to shoot at a wide angle, when sharpness is important; you can make the price a little lower, the consumer will be very happy

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I've never seen worse! Horrible purchase.

Before that, I didn’t shoot on a digital SLR, there were Zenith and other film cameras, then a Fuji 5500 camera with 10x zoom. Now I bought a 50D and took this lens. a year ago, for 7000r and weighing 300g, it shoots better than not the worst Sapop, weighing 1,5 kg . The lens, in principle, does not give a sharp image. Terrible geometric distortions are much better on Fujik. Do not under any circumstances buy this lens. It’s better not to buy anything. One big disappointment. Maybe, of course…

Pros
  • Well made and that's about it.
Cons
  • Disgusting sharpness, terrible distortion of the picture, dark.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I bought it in early August 2022 along with the 550D as a universal lens for all occasions, because I just needed a high-quality alternative to the soap dish. the lens does its job perfectly! we must remember that there is no universal quality or anything, especially for such money. if you make a living with photography, then you need a different lens. and if your photos are in the style of "I was here" or just sometimes there is a creative mood and at the same time there is no desire /…

Pros
  • versatility, quite adequate price, built-in stabilizer and fast autofocus.
Cons
  • not too clear pictures at a long focus (I used a tripod and self-timer - it didn’t help), a slight backlash and sometimes under its weight the trunk can slightly move out by itself if the camera is turned with the lens down.