Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 84
  • 5
    38
  • 4
    23
  • 3
    16
  • 2
    6
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

in general, the tires are very good, as I wrote without losing the spikes, and there are a lot of them, 180 pieces or so. the tire scoops out of deep snow where the GOODYEAR Ultra Grip Ice Arctic immediately burrowed, but unlike them with the hancock, there was a slight uncertainty in the turns, with Goodyear there was no such thing there, he entered the turn at full throttle with the confidence that everything would be fine anyway, but there is a slight jitters on the hancock that the rubber…

Pros
  • The first rubber without losing studs during the winter. It goes very confidently in deep snow, does not dig in immediately. good on ice too. I liked the tires.
Cons
  • After the GOODYEAR Ultra Grip Ice Arctic tires, there was a feeling of vague uncertainty about the behavior of the car, but it always went where it was supposed to and without demolition, skidding, etc.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

I chose tires for a long time, I read a bunch of reviews, and I thought that these would suit me. I liked the tires in everything. The road is well kept. At a speed of 1402022220 km / h, it is comfortable to drive. Never got stuck in the snow. By spikes. An almost perfect result. Rolled about 6000 km. Wheel loss: Left rear - everything is in place. Left front - 1 spike Right rear - 2 spikes (in one place, apparently there was a strong load on that place.) Right front - 1 spike. The car is front

Pros
  • patency Comfort wear resistance Strength
Cons
  • Many stones after the winter in the driven wheels; On water it behaves at 3 out of 5. On water it is very noisy and the car floats.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Took in 2022, skated 3 full seasons. What can I say: 1) not too noisy; 2) excellent grip on snow and ice; 3) for 3 seasons not a single spike flew out, fantastic; 4) do an excellent job with the track, the car does not jump; 4) there is a significant drawback - very thin sides. The wife consistently killed 2 tires, hitting potholes. The hernia immediately comes out and the tire is replaced . It's good that this happened before the rise in price.

Pros
  • If you go around the pits - a wonderful rubber.
Cons
  • Very thin board, easily breaks through potholes.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

I write all the pros and cons about the size 235/55 R17 103T, maybe in other sizes there will be other sensations. In general, you can take it, but be careful. With a better financial condition, of course I’ll buy a Continental or Nokian, because I’m used to them and in the north I choose only top tires. In general, this Hankook is also a top for this company. And the quality of these tires is being brought up to the level of the world's top three. Recently, a polygon was opened beyond the…

Pros
  • 1. Price 2. Tire quality 3. Manufacture made in not ours 4. Excellent winter road holding 5. Rows well in snow and ice
Cons
  • 1. As soon as I put it on, it made a little noise. Then rolled up and became quieter. 2. On autumn asphalt - none. Valkaya, poorly managed. As soon as the temperatures returned to the winter norm, it became better. 3. A little floating on the track. 4. There is a sense of rut. 5. In the spring it turned into a pumpkin. I have never seen such disgusting behavior on wet pavement with porridge. This is the first tire that scares me with its imbalance of properties. Excellent in winter, and in autumn and spring - G

Revainrating 4 out of 5

All is well, liked the product, didn't buy it for nothing.

12/01/2022 Bought Hankook Winter i Pike RS2 W429 91T in size 205/55/16, installed on Skoda Octavia. Went running spikes in urban areas. While asphalt. According to the sound at the beginning of the movement, a pleasant chirping rustling, at 40-60 of its spikes is almost inaudible, it is much more clearly audible past the studded ones passing by. Tread noise increases from 60 to 80. This is normal for winter tires. Soft yet manageable. Almost summer Michelin (there is something to compare)…

Pros
  • With regards to Hankook rubber, I can say that I am satisfied with it. I drove it around Hong Kong from 12/01/2022 to 12/05/2022 - 235 km. And on asphalt, and on snowy porridge, and on ice, it walks confidently, does not throw, does not lead. The sidewall is not as rigid as the Bridgestone. The spikes sit deep. Because of this, she is a cross between Velcro and eminent spikes.
Cons
  • Deficiencies only in the heads can be with a too confident driving style. Velcro, even spikes - winter does not change the laws of physics. If it's slippery on your feet, then why are people sure that there are no wheels .

Skated the season - about 6k km. I put five stars for the price / quality ratio. If without taking into account the price, then four. Of course, top-end tires are better, but there is an incomparable price tag. Tires are good on snow and ice, not very noisy on asphalt. During the season, I have not lost a single spike, although I like to staratnut at a traffic light! I got into freezing rain on the highway, survived and did not fly into a ditch. In terms of price-quality ratio, there are very…

Pros
  • Soft, quiet, lots of spikes. Good tread pattern. Not expensive.
Cons
  • Valky.

Before that, I went to hakapelite5. This is the first impression, and not a full review, as I drove about 300 km. HOOM! which you begin to feel after 30 km / h. while running, more than 80 did not overclock. it's too early to talk about control, acceleration and braking. I can only comment on softness. I hope the noise will be less after running. I am adding! Drove about 3000 km. Nothing has changed in terms of noise and hum and in general. Driving performance in general at 4. It will go for…

Pros
  • Price. Manufacturer country. Soft.
Cons
  • hum

The rubber is 3 seasons, only 3-4 spikes flew out on each wheel, and there are a lot of them on the tire. At city speeds, they brake normally on any surface. The noise is average, I had Deshman's summer tires much noisier. The price is democratic. But if you ride a lot on the track, then choose a different rubber. When overtaking at a speed of 100 in a rut, the tires could not hold the car, made 3 turns, since there was no oncoming lane and the truck slowed down. Very soft sidewall and the tire

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Description

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

In general, I am satisfied with the rubber, I advise you to buy. The car on which the rubber is used is Kia Cerato, size 195/65/15. Its pros: The rubber is almost silent, a lot depends on the car, but this model does not have the sound of an airplane taking off. It goes very confidently through the snow, now I’m calmly going where I used to immediately burrow. Moving vnatyag, pulls the car out of any ambush, given the snowy winter in Hong Kong and the lack of public utilities in the yards…

Good performance considering the price. Soft, quiet tires, spikes are not lost. When I traveled in Hong Kong in the usual snowless winter, in general, everything was fine. But last winter there was a lot of snow - on these tires it winds quite strongly in a snow rut, this is their biggest drawback. So in comparison with my favorites - Nokian Hakka - they are, of course, worse.

Pros
  • The studs hold up well, the tires are soft and quiet enough
Cons
  • Chatting in a snow rut

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Traveled winter, changed shoes and examined the tires. All spikes are in place, there is almost no wear on the rubber. The spikes are sharp at the edges (cut my finger).

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

Considering that there was only a couple of snows throughout the winter, I expected that by the time the tires were changed in the spring, there would be no place left for the spikes, but to my surprise, the spikes are all in place and quite in good condition. The tire is a solid four, mainly because of the price, if it cost a little more, then I would not take it and recommend it to others, because. in terms of driving characteristics, it is average, there are more successful winter tires…

Pros
  • Price, availability, good wear resistance.
Cons
  • Poor resistance to slashplaning.

I changed shoes for my swallow in these tires, before that I skated on Nordman 7 for a couple of seasons. The very first thing I want to note after leaving the tire shop: “did they change my shoes for sure?” The tires are really very quiet (of course, not a summer highway, but compared to Nordman it’s just heaven and earth, the same Conti ice contact 3 is much noisier). Some users in the comments wrote about problems when braking on wet pavement, today I drove on this all day (about the same…

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, passable
Cons
  • Subjectively, "zero" at low speeds has become not very clear

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The purchase is a failure, very dissatisfied.

You can’t read while driving, especially their reviews. Bought high places in their winter tire review. I bought a set of tires, a car - a prior. Ran carefully 400-500 km. Was surprised by the ugly handling of cars during this period, but patiently waiting for a miracle. Before that, there was Formula ICE rubber, although it is not the best in quality, it is predictable on the road. The miracle didn't happen. Absolute tension when driving on these tires is provided to you! Invigorate nerves…

Pros
  • Rubber is not noisy . And that's it
Cons
  • It does not hold the track at all, the car is unpredictably thrown out of it. On ice, the car does not slow down. In snow porridge, unpredictable behavior of a car.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not worth the money.

Mileage 13000. Car under warranty. Well balanced. After that, I went to the collapse-convergence. Said gone right front and back. What is it because of the rubber. They did it right. Immediately noticed increased valkost and shakiness. Floats on the track. relatives at 55. At the first exit to the track after 130, I heard the roar of a jet engine, I thought the engine was kicked. It turned out it's so yelling rubber. Handling and stopping distances have become worse than on the summer Hankook…

Pros
  • Soft, many spikes, price. 205x60x16. I put it on a sneaker.
Cons
  • The roar of rubber after 130, namely the roar. Drove almost 2022 km. nothing changed. Very poor handling and emergency braking at 0 degrees. Almost ran into the rear bumper of the car in front.

I bought 175 70 13 for rear-wheel drive. The first season did not lose a single spike. Rubber is ideal for ice, BUT like a "cow on ice" as you drive on asphalt. It is washed out on snow and porridge. Bought in 2022. Excellent departure of snowfalls. Where front-wheel drive cars slipped into an icy hill covered with snow, I flew at a pretty penny, though a car in the snow looks more like a motor boat, it doesn’t drive, but floats, rows with wheels. I drove into snowy hills at high speeds with…

Pros
  • It behaves well on the ice, the spikes hold. Not very noisy.
Cons
  • Poor rides on the pavement zamylivaetsya.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

After the summer tires, I thought I would have to pile on the music louder, but no, I didn’t guess, the rubber, although with a fat tread + spikes, behaves quietly. It is clear that the speeds are not the same as in summer, but still a decent and not expensive option. In appearance, the spikes seem to be slightly recessed into the rubber, but you feel confident on the ice, let's see what happens to the spikes after the operating season . I caught myself thinking that the rubber forgives small…

Pros
  • soft and quiet rubber
Cons
  • floats a little in a rut

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for the price.

Different pros: Grip in all winter disciplines and good balance at high speed, it also rolls well and is balanced by a small amount of weights. Different cons: Different compliance of the tread, between the middle and extreme parts of it, which in turn creates a feeling of a step during re-lays.

Size 205/60 R16. I considered three options in this price segment: Nordman 7, NordFrost200 and Winter i * Pike RS2. As a result, by the method of exceptions, I settled on the latter. It bribed that in the tests of well-known auto publications, Winter i * Pike RS2 performed almost on an equal footing with Nokian and Conti. Just in ContiIceContact 2, the second car is shod, so I can compare. The first thing that caught my eye was the density of the studding and the shape of the spike tip in the…

Pros
  • - very quiet for studded tires, - many spikes - soft (comfortable) - patency in the snow, - grip on ice - price
Cons
  • - braking distance on wet pavement

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I'm completely satisfied with the product, it works.

I bought it, ran it for about a thousand km, and in the first season only 1 spike popped up on the front drive wheel. The second season began to notice that there were fewer spikes. Manageability has deteriorated. Decided to change while they can still be sold. Some pros: Tread wear resistance Manageability first year Not 1 puncture for 50 thousand Cons: Spikes began to fly out after the first season, 4 years and there are 30 percent of them left Buried in soft snow