Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 32
  • 5
    19
  • 4
    10
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

The model is an E8400, and it was purchased in the spring of 2022. Did not drive. With its positives being: It was still stunning in 2022, despite the fact that the brakes in Win7 had, of course, appeared, but they were not important. Still suitable for use in office work, despite the fact that purchasing a new one would make absolutely no sense at all. It functioned properly and did not become warm when used in conjunction with a standard cooler. With these drawbacks: Not that I'm aware of. It

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

65 candles are the recognized coefficient of the adverse effect known as TDP (heat power). Temperatures can swing widely (40 degrees to 100 degrees), but for me, my comfort level is almost entirely determined by the cooler. Despite the fact that I'm confused about the issue of noiselessness right now, and whether or not to turn the fan off, you can either set it to four revolutions per second. It is quite improbable that your device would overheat over 55 degrees if you have at least one…

Pros
  • On a voltage scale, it went up to 3.6 without any problems after starting at 2.8. Simply did not work any more. While some of the games I play on it see a performance hit, the vast majority of my work do not. Or slow down because of blatantly incorrect program settings (let's use Firefox and a hundred add-ons to it as an example). Let's just say it: the finest games are not the most recent games, in spite of the fact that a lot of cool burps are not burped from the earlier ones, and on other platforms under emulsifiers. Because of this, it works well for me. The editing (coding) that has been fine-tuned is simply pushed to the background and forgotten about. There are several processors that use novel architectures, however it is unclear how they can generally outperform it. Only when the percent is increased does there appear to be a discernible change in performance, as shown by the tables in Aida-64. Some "i7" processors have 4 or 6 cores, which results in a higher total frequency. And I don't get what you mean when you imply that new CPUs are superior for some new "architecture" over there. Where you are going, you won't find any performances. Only the frequency and number of cores are taken into account. This Duu c 3.52 is still superior to the i5, which only scores 1.74. The improvement to the architecture is purely cosmetic, and in most cases, the benefits of the upgrade are negated by the effects of overclocking, provided that the system has not been overclocked to its absolute limit. Not the performance, but rather a fresh "format" of the CPU and all of its components is required in order to run new programs. Regarding the spread of heat, please refer to the remarks.
Cons
  • On it, two thermal sensors will always report a temperature of at least 54 degrees for each unique core! There has been some type of a blunder here. The sensor that is located below it on the system map displays the typical average temperature beginning at 28 degrees, but the sensor that is located on the sensor itself only displays itself when the temperature goes over 54 degrees.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

Mother Asus p5ql pro, has been working on it since 2022/9, I don't remember precisely when I bought it, and so, he lives wonderfully, works, edits Word, plays 1080p on YouTube, and plays 4k video (but only those that are on the device, 4k YouTube does not export). Mother Asus p5ql pro has been working on it since 2022/9. About what else could one possibly comment on this processor? - so, how exactly would this be the optimal solution in order to get a used solution for 5,000 dollars, an entire…

Pros
  • 1. Honest 2 cores 2. A frequency of 2.66 gigahertz (for 2022/9) 3. In 2022, sufficient for use in work, tanks, and other ordinary activities 4. Overclocking, readily raised to 3.03 GHz; my personal chase is up to 4.1 GHz; nevertheless, the work is not very stable; 3.7-9 GHz is its suitable upper limit.
Cons
  • 1. Regardless of how they are now, at the time of purchase this computer had a good PC assembly on the processor. 2. In NBA 2K17, it continues to be a capable workhorse that also has the capacity to overclock. Therefore, there is not one.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, but having its own defects.

Excellent processor for the majority of jobs. It will not be sufficient simply for programs that require more than two hardware threads at once, nor will it be sufficient for the most up-to-date games. Pros: Good speed even on the most basic motherboard (asus with two RAM slots, three PCI, and one PCI-express, I don't recall the model), but on the MSI X48C Platinum with four gigabytes of RAM, so that something slows down, so far I haven't gotten into such a situation. Various disadvantages: I…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

A half year was spent putting money down for this processor, during which time my friends made fun of me. After that, it sat idle in my possession for another half year while I waited for the motherboard. I was able to construct an entire gaming computer for the cost of 15,000 dollars using this processor as the foundation of the system. In general, the processor is a very cost-effective alternative for building a gaming computer. just. Since the CPU is sometimes referred to as the "heart" of…

Pros
  • The model E8500 is being described here. High frequency, full cache, low power consumption (only 65 watts), low heat dissipation (around 51 degrees Celsius), and the widest memory bus (333 MHz) are all features of this processor. The performance rating of 6.6 for Windows 7 is considered to be fairly high.
Cons
  • No results found.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

An outstanding proportion, however even so for your money thank you very much. and what is it that you require? This is typical of Intel; they regularly increase the prices of their products. Since 2022, I've been making use of this miraculous device, and it has never failed me (although there have been occasions when it has), it doesn't get very hot, and it can be overclocked to 3.8 gigahertz even when used in conjunction with a "piece of aluminum." As a profession, and naturally, the "hellish

Pros
  • Regarding the cold performance.
Cons
  • The 775 Socket is getting a little bit old. However, it is still possible to install Quad: D. A little pricey, but you can get anything used for two dollars:)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

It is adequate for use as a low-cost gaming computer or even for a straightforward office worker. However, it is recommended that you purchase an i3 or higher because. This particular processor is no longer available. Below are some advantages: Price, performance, and overclockability; even without overclocking, generally keeps the game at its normal level; little overheating. I had no issues launching Battle 4, however there were some friezes caused by ineffective operators. After it was taken

Revainrating 3 out of 5

In general, everything is not bad, but I expected more.

This processor was desirable a year and a half ago, but its appeal has significantly diminished since then. Do not believe those who say "all games are not stupid" since this is not true, it is primarily a video card, but even for HD5870 or GTX470 this processor is, to put it bluntly, weak, and I am not talking about confu of numerous cards! Also, don't forget about the two cores! You will need at least three of these now! By the way, an AMD Athlon 440 costs $75, but it is faster than this…

Pros
  • It appears that the CPU is no longer being manufactured.
Cons
  • There are a significant number of them. The technical technique is not brand new; rather, it is the same 45nm method as before. For instance, it combines the G6950 in accordance with ALL of the criteria, but it costs an additional 1000–1500! All of them have passed the Core2Duo stage, and it would be foolish to take them as new.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

My instance: 4000 MHz for 4000. Or a per megahertz. What else can be said here? Megastone! :) P. S: E8200 is out of production. Take the E8400 with the latest stepping - don't miss it! ;) Pros below: Cheap. High performance (large cache, fast bus). Cold and economical (45 nm after all). Great overclocking potential! Its cons: The processor itself is cheap, but. Its maximum multiplier is 8x, so for serious overclocking you need a good mother capable of holding 500+ on the bus, and memory…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am completely satisfied, item complies with description.

the percent is magnificent . toys pull everything . good enough in terms of file processing, video encoding, etc.)) With its pros: A fairly powerful processor in its class . it works optimally with a gigabyte graphics card 9600gt, 4g of RAM and a terik tinker . the frequency is chasing current on the way . overclocking to 4MHz is real . Some cons: the only drawback is the price . for that kind of money you can find a more powerful unit in principle . but how . on a simple box it is warm enough…