Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 54
  • 5
    41
  • 4
    9
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Yes, he is really fast! With this processor, you definitely will not feel the brakes. I could not load it 100%, including in games, despite the fact that I have not overclocked it yet. In addition, I would also like to note the performance of the integrated graphics core - well, in my opinion, I would compare it with the nVidia GTS250. But the price spoils the whole picture, for this money you can look for something more reasonable in terms of price / quality ratio.

Pros
  • New architecture Performance Decent graphics core
Cons
  • Price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I assembled a computer, I can’t just convert 1080p video from a DSLR - compress 3 gigabytes of video - ten hours on the laptop (the old man on the T8300, of course, but nonetheless) Here, 10 minutes. Song. For games, there is no reason to take NO - only work with photo / video. It will not add FPS - take i5. I hope the platform is without glitches and will not be removed in a year, as it was with its predecessors - of course, Intel has lured it already.

Pros
  • Power. Potential for overclocking - I see no reason to take stones for 2022 at 3 times the price for a 10-15% increase. I assembled a computer for myself on a mini-ITX Z87 chipset. I'm not interested in overlock yet, having set auto overclocking - 4.0 Giga - I'm satisfied.
Cons
  • Well, judging by the tests, it will not work for maniacs with a scalp and nitrogen. And so for many the price of course.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

the stone is excellent, it was not possible to load it to the full in more than one game! everything is set to the maximum, the maximum temperature in games is 45 degrees, I drive so far without overclocking at 3.9 cleanliness, but I think that it will last for a long time Intel Core i7-4770K mother-Asus Z87-A Video: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (3 GB) memory: 16 gigs power supply: 850 ssd OCZ-VERTEX460 ATA Device (SATA-III) - 240 GB so take this stone for a long time

Pros
  • Intel Core i7-4770K, I've been using it for 1 year, it's very fast, it copes with all tasks with a bang! at the expense of heating; everyone writes that it is necessary to scalp hot, I didn’t notice, on standard settings 3.9 the temperature is 30 degrees in idle time at full load in the test 60 degrees, while the cooler worked at 800-830 rpm. When overclocked to 4.6 by the AISuite3 program at full load in the test, the CPU showed 70 degrees, the cores jumped up to 75 degrees and this was with air cooling. Asus Z87-A motherboard but AISuite3 prog downloaded from Asus Z97-A from the official.
Cons
  • Of course, I took the price for 11.5 thousand and now to 20 thousand

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

I took the Q6600 to replace it - the difference is many times. I assembled the following: i7 4770 + Asrock Z87 Pro3 + Cooler Master Hyper TX3 EVO cooler + 16Gb Corsair 1600Mhz + GTX570 (handheld) + 64Gb SSD. I heard a lot about heating - but strangely enough, I have only 35/55 degrees (with an extra 100 Mhz). Overclocking is not great - you can make 4771 out of it - increase the bus from 100 to 103 in the BIOS . More - alas, no ( The aging of processors is a little slower than that of AMD…

Pros
  • Powerful, efficient, long lasting
Cons
  • Expensive pleasure (at the time of purchase - 11600), the multiplier is locked

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I won't buy any more.

Think realistically about the temperature! Its pros: What I can tell you is of course power. In aida 64 qpu queen 47.658, in overclocking 4.1 52.650. In overclocking, the temperature is 60-65 at a load of 100% (raised by a multiplier). The voltage is all on auto. The cooler took cooler master v 8. If you raise the frequency above 4.2, then the temperature rises to 90. In idle it is cold 22-25 degrees. I also have a pc on fx 8350 - qpu queen 36.574 Has cons: Real high temperature! Overclocking…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

I bought a processor to replace the Core 2 E8400. This one is 3 times faster in all tests. Windows 7 rated (7.7) I bought an arctic freezer 13 for it at idle 41 degrees, at max load in BattleField 4 it reaches 50. (Zalman thermal paste) Initially, I took the processor for games, the programs also work very quickly. It will not work to load the processor to the maximum, there is a large margin for the future. You can run 10 different programs at once + watch videos and play the game, the…

Pros
  • 22 nm manufacturing process, Number of physical cores 4 and 4 virtual, Hyper-Threading support, Very efficient and fast processor. Power consumption 84 W.
Cons
  • There are none, the only cooling you need to buy separately, because the standard Box cooler can't cope.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A little bit not what I expected, generally fine.

Everything has already been written for me. If you can still do something with a thermal gum (Here, perhaps, a rather thick layer of textolite can be attributed to the advantages, because of which this processor can still be scalped relatively safely, which cannot be said about later Skylake, Kaby Lake and other lakes), the overclocking potential is completely disappointing. My copy, together with Maximus VI Impact and Thermaltake Water 3.0, does not take a frequency above 4.1 (the…

Pros
  • Performance per core, multithreading, cool at stock frequencies, software support for HEVC.
Cons
  • Seminal fluid under the lid, absolutely not chasing.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

What are you guys?! What dissatisfaction with the temperature? I have no dropsy 4.2 and video for 1500 without brakes and overheating. Toys should be transferred to 47 inches and a prefix with a wireless joystick;) The processor is in an overclocked state when working in Windows and surfing 38-40. And that's just the cooler replaced with a Katana! A friend advised. And EVERYTHING! In general, there are no problems. The seer even forgot that he wanted to buy something. My wife and kids play…

Pros
  • Reliability, performance, low temperature.
Cons
  • NO!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Feel free to buy, for such a price, the quality is simply amazing.

This percentage has been working in my PC for 4 years (approximately). I have 4x4GB 1333 memory, overclocked to 1800+ mhz (stable in everything). If you put 2400+ mhz memory into the system, some modern games will work better. However, it is better to look towards i3-9100f or analogs from AMD. If it is possible to buy it for a penny (below 7,000 in 2022) and you understand why you need it, then yes. Prots is good for its time, but its time is running out.

Pros
  • All wonderful processor, but not for 2022/2022. Almost all games are not bad, except for some of the most modern ones at the end of 2022. Works fine, however, almost any modern processor with 6+ cores will be better.
Cons
  • The main drawback is that it works on platforms that only support DDR3 memory (platform - a motherboard with a certain socket and chipset; in my case - z97). The second drawback is that it has 4 cores / 8 threads (many modern games today work significantly better on processors with 6 cores). The third disadvantage is that it does not chase (this is 4770, not 4770k). The fourth drawback is that on platforms that support this processor, there are practically no M.2 connectors for modern NVMe drives, and where they are (or there is an adapter from PCI-E to M.2), the speed of the disk will be much lower than on modern platforms with "PCI-E 3" or "PCI-E 4". The speed of the disk (hard/solid state) is of great importance, because. greatly affects the work at the computer, the speed of loading applications, games, the speed of writing and reading files.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

AMD FX8120 stood before it - that model was really for overclocking, took 4.8, and did not degrade when the voltage was raised, but it was replaced, because. the architecture of bulls and vishers as a whole is weak. By the way, on the same cooler (Zalman CNPS9900 MAX Blue) at a frequency of 4.8, the temperature of the 8120 never rose above 60. Now stands together with MSI r9 290 (without x). All games on ultra, FullHD + 4xMSAA, always over 60 fps. By the way, you won’t believe it…

Pros
  • -4770k stone - the messiah and skyward gaming pitch. -Performance (now redundant, i5 4670k - for the eyes). - Closed ring BLCK - more or less chasing in frequency. - Trinkets aka hyper-thrending, 4600hd, BOOST 2.0. - the best processor in terms of performance per core at the moment (in the passmark of parrots on a single core it is higher than that of the 5960x).
Cons
  • -Oh, how hot, maybe he has a heat pack of 84W, but it heats up to 72c and this, please note the maximum temperature, at 73 throttling begins, with all this, when the load is removed, the temperature drops to 32s in 5 seconds. That's magic, isn't it? - Apparently, the sample did not really catch me, it runs up to 4.2 without increasing the voltage, it is stable, it keeps the temperature under the linpak around 80c. With an increase to 1.225, it keeps 4.3, but the temperatures are already under 90, of course, Windows starts blueing from it. -The most important disadvantage is that at a voltage of 1.3v core, the STRONGEST degradation of floating-point computing units begins, in a year the frequencies will jump constantly, as a result, it will only work for 1-2 years. - The thermal interface under the cover is not very good, as the warranty ends, I will change it. Prots took OEM, cooler Zalman CNPS9900 MAX Blue.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything about the product satisfied me, the price is perfect.

Bought for my new system. The choice fell on him because of the need for video encoding and working with CADs. The stone has weak overclocking on a standard thermal interface (hereinafter referred to as TI) from Intel. Why such a policy, I don’t understand, it was possible to put solder on the tops, although for the future . damn marketing. It was possible to disperse the stone to 4400(1)/4400(2)/4300(3)/4300(4) - 1.250 (Adaptive), with the standard TI. The stone was scalped the day after the…

Pros
  • Powerful Overclocking capability. Cold, if not overclocked.
Cons
  • Price. Weak overclocking, on a standard thermal interface.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

Bought to replace i7-920. In terms of performance, they are similar, I would have saddles on the 920 if it were not for the problem of finding a new motherboard for it. But in the end, I don’t regret it, because I bought an equally productive chip, but much colder and more energy efficient + integrated graphics (which I now needed). I do not advise you to take it for those who just need a computer for the web or gaming, i3 and i5 are enough for you for these purposes, and you will simply…

Pros
  • Excellent processor. Cold, at idle (+29°), hotter under load, but not much (+45°). Perfectly shows itself in tasks where multiple threads and parallel computing are required. Having a good motherboard, you can drive pretty well (4.6GHz without increasing the voltage). But he shows himself so well in most tasks, so I'll leave this matter for later, when it becomes obsolete and a performance boost is needed. Separately, it is worth noting the integrated graphics. The Intel HD Graphics 4600 is enough for more than just everyday tasks like watching movies, browsing the web, and working in the office. She works well with games. Although she is still far away for older brothers (external cards), she will show herself well as a temporary replacement. All the games that I ran worked perfectly at the minimum settings with FullHD (some even at the maximum), I could not boast of such a result of 4000.
Cons
  • The price is high. I understand that everyone wants to eat and you can’t sell at cost . But still, his price tag is inflated.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

I bought this processor 2 years ago to replace the core i3 2120. In conjunction with the GTX970 and 8 gigabytes of RAM, it still shows impressive results in games. The Witcher 3 ran at maximum settings without any lags, twitches, etc. The fact that he is not chasing is both a plus and a minus. If you buy in the secondary market, then this is rather a plus, because. the remaining processor resource will be greater.

Pros
  • - performance, - Energy consumption, - low operating temperature, - reliability.
Cons
  • - not chasing

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

I used to be a fan of AMD processors, but after Bulldozer and Vishera I decided to buy Intel. The choice was between i5 4670K and i7 4770K. I needed Hyper Threading (for my own reasons), in the end I bought a 4770K. Previously, there was an AMD X4 Athlon II 640, the overall increase is felt very strongly, in games the increase is about 50-100% (depending on which ones). As for the price, I think it's a bit overpriced. We overpay 2-3 thousand for "intel", although the latest processor from AMD…

Pros
  • Speed, speed and again speed (what else can you write?)
Cons
  • Price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

The performance of the stone is noticeably higher than the old versions of the 4-core i7. For example, according to my measurements, a non-overclocked i7-4770 is 20 percent faster than, for example, a non-overclocked i7-2600K. At 25 degrees in the room, at 100% load (special stress test), the cores of an unoverclocked i7-4770 heat up to about 75-77 degrees (cooler - Arctic Cooling Freezer 13 for $25, not much more powerful than a boxed one). "Aid'ovsky wattmeter" shows "package consumption"…

Pros
  • Excellent computing performance, integrated graphics are also quite decent - it allows you not to buy a video card in principle.
Cons
  • Not designed for overclocking, you need a more or less decent cooler, not cheaper than $20-30

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

They talk about the thermal under the lid. There is no desire to go there. In long renders, the temperature reached 80, but as soon as the load ended, it drops to 36-40 in 2-3 seconds. Mystic. Just as instantly, this temperature can jump from 25 to 50 degrees (as soon as a heavy load begins). In general, I am very pleased with the processor, it gnaws everyday tasks like seeds, and massively. I will not say anything about the standard video, since religion does not allow using it (in my…

Pros
  • Nimble, haswell, overclocking "for dummies", cold and economical in idle
Cons
  • If this miracle of engineering and marketing thought is strongly loaded, then it is not even very sickly heated.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I won't buy any more.

I am ating the review after replacing the thermal interface with liquid metal. The operation was successful! But the results are not so hot. The maximum temperature dropped by 8-10 degrees. Before replacement: worked stably at 4.4 with autovoltage - 72-74 in 100% load render. After replacement: 4.6 to 1.36 V, max. 94 hail, but unstable. LinX - 30 times passes only at 4.5 at 1.33V The temperature is around 90 degrees. It also started on 4.7 but there are a lot of BSODs. The cooler is one of the…

Pros
  • - Very good price/performance ratio. Best option for home, budget, graphics station or cluster compute cell. - All possible Intel goodies like Hyper-threading, virtualization, PCI-E 3.0 support, fierce RAM frequency, etc., allow you to assemble the most modern machine without overpaying too much.
Cons
  • Do not believe those who say that he is cold! At 100% computing load - it's hot! You can't do without a good cooler! And this is an additional cost! See the comment about my adventures :) Well, thermal paste under the cover! At least for version K, they could have laid something better. Read the forums - third-party thermal pastes give a gain of up to 5-10 degrees under load!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

I have been fiddling with computers for 11 years now, I have been modernizing, since 2022 I started as soon as the fourth stumps began to appear. I don’t know how anyone, but the stone is super, my core temperature is from 17 to 25 degrees in standby mode, and in games such as max payne 3, farcry 3, Call of duty Ghost, etc. the temperature of the stone is only 45 degrees. The case in the printsepe is simple - PA5-927-800W PSU, Asus H87-Plus mother, two Kingston 9905403-559. A00LF 8 GB RAMs…

Pros
  • Performance
Cons
  • There are no such!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the quality is good and the price is reasonable.

Quite fast, win7 rating - 7.8. It turbocharges up to 3.9 and keeps this frequency under 100% load 90% of the time. Idle 28-30 degrees. And now the truth: Under load, the voltage jumps, because of this, the temperatures jump, in Linx under load, the temperatures are mostly 70-78 degrees, but as soon as the jump in the voltage flickers, literally for 1 second 92g! The percentage is not throttling, but it is clear that there is porridge under the lid, I did not overclock, the percentage is for…

Pros
  • Fast, cold idle
Cons
  • Thermal paste under the lid, price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A high-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I have never had a stone more powerful than this. Anything and everything flies. Here is my config: Localized in the BIOS clock frequency under 3.5 GHz, so as not to sag. The processor frequency was followed by the RAM frequency of 3.5 GHz. As a result of this connection, I got VERY high performance. CPU: Intel Core i7-4770s 3.5 GHz RAM: Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400MHz 8GB (2x4) (3.5 GHz dual-channel) PSU: Xilence 600W MB: Gigabyte Z87M-HD3 GPU: Asus GeForce GTX 275 - 1 GB (60 fps in…

Pros
  • Frisky - 10k parrots in benchmarks, like everyone else (K,1,S,0) Cold - 65W = 30 degrees idle = up to 50 under load Cheaper than the K version, but not inferior to competitors in performance. Stability - no interruptions, no hints of fps drops in games or muted rendering. The price/quality ratio is perfect. S version is cheaper than others in Europe. (K,T,0,1)
Cons
  • Not suitable for maniacs with a scalpel and nitrogen (frequency threshold at 3.9 Ghz) That's why this is the S version, it is not considered a disadvantage, but rather the opposite - the standard of stability in my eyes.