MAXXIS Premitra HP5 225/50 R17 94W summer Review

Great quiet tire. Not the first set with the second everything is fine. On wet and puddles it behaves perfectly, there is no aquaplaning. Bought in colobox

they ride well, they don’t make a hissing noise, in inexpensive rowing they row confidently enough for road tires. Maybe because of the dimension of course, rolls and soft.

I took 215/60 R16 Maxxis HP5 99W XL for a minivan. I doubted for a long time, maybe I drive very fast and on the tracks. Satisfied so far, we'll see. The price-quality ratio is very good. Has some pros: Handling is very good. Holds in corners. Braking is excellent. I have not traveled much on water yet, but the longitudinal pattern is wide and very deep, I think that everything will be fine with this. Its cons: There is a feeling of "trailer", the rolling is not very light (pressure 2.4).

First year. Fine. Second. Just zero. It became a lot of punctures only to go to the primer. I put a spike and it failed. Very thin rubber. Maxis was a few years ago the same thing.

In general, everything is clear here, miracles do not happen - if you want controllability - put up with wear, if you want wear resistance . (continue for yourself). Different pros: Water diverts with a bang, clings to the asphalt like a cat, silence in the cabin for five. With its cons: No wear resistance . 10 thousand before the wear indicator is 3 mm . Driving style is normal.

Reviewed a bunch of tests. And I can say one of the best tires with other premium tires, but for the money it's a fairy tale. See for yourself and see for yourself.

And now I'm being serious. Prior to that, I consistently used Conti, Premium Contact 2, and Sport 5. What else can I say than that I enjoyed it? However, they were not without their drawbacks. Over the stones, thus over the stones is a practice that I do not advocate because it involves traveling around pits, joints, and other obstacles. In close proximity to the curb, and it's all right. In general, one of the things that is most enjoyed is doing things from and on the curbs. And the most…

205/45 R17 is the original tire size. Two years was a long time for a native Michelin; three or four hernias on the wheel meant early death. They followed that up with an order for profile 45 Kumho ECSTA Sport tires. Excellent hard sports tires; cheap, wonderfully long-lasting, but noisy and uncomfortable; shocks to the suspension; ball joints to be replaced annually. Then came Yokohama C. Drive2, but in a softer 50 profile. New tires have a pleasant silence. As they put it on, they start to…

In April of 2022, we gave the Skoda Yeti tires measuring maxxis premitra 5 225 / 55zr17. On further inspection (in July), we discovered that the rear wheels had a significant alignment issue, as measured by the wheel alignment. After a distance of around 10,000 kilometers, the rear tires were nearly totally worn out. There was definitely a blockage, but considering the amount of wear and tear, it was understandable. too much for me to handle.

Auto Skoda Yoiti 1.4 125 forces, which I drive energetically, of course, but without slipping, and other drift). And the automobile won't let you do it anyway. Size 225/50/17. After three months of use, the mileage was somewhere between ten and eleven thousand. Please find attached photo.

Got it new with the car. I wouldn't buy one myself. Apparently, it wasn't expensive before. Now it makes no sense to take it for a couple of seasons for that kind of money Pros below: They hold the road well, practically do not feel the rut. On wet pavement behave adequately Has cons: I skated one and a half summer seasons and the tires were almost gone. Mileage somewhere around 30 thousand on it. 20/80 city/highway with a relaxed driving style. Not enough for a third season. This is the first…

Good day everyone! Well, I practically skated the third winter on Maxis (Velcro), everything is not even bad, yes there is an ABS operation, but as far as I understand it was created to work, for this price it is basically normal, again, I repeat this is not continental. as I wrote earlier, I threw two wheels away in the summer, into the trash (very bad, the manufacturer is fat 2) this is 50,000 thousand mileage in two years, of which from April 15 to October 15 in the summer, about 16 thousand

Quality rubber. We were satisfied with the value for the money. High-altitude traction, both on rain-soaked asphalt and the primer. I would suggest picking a more affordable category.

They cost 195/55 R16 91V Lancer IX 2.0. Driving style is active, mostly track and mountain serpentine. I won’t say anything about them on the primer, because. the chassis on the car itself is tough. They have been standing since the beginning of the summer of 2022, balanced with a minimum weight of cargo, I fly into puddles without worrying and without fear, when starting on dry pavement, I need to try hard to break loose. In a rut, as for me, they don’t behave very well. I caught pits, I fly…

DURING the summer of 2022, I skated 17,000 km on them, dimension 225/50, compared to the rubber that I rolled in 2022 (sailoon, sold with the car, there is a review in the profile), Maxis wears out faster and catches self-tapping screws, or maybe I'm just so lucky . Strength at a height in which holes just did not fall, everything is ok. It balances perfectly, 20-30 grams of cargo per disk. I already changed into them yesterday and started the summer season 2022. I don’t know what else to…

The tires were purchased before the 2022 summer season. The tire production date is week 52, 2022. For the full 4 summer seasons, the mileage was ~ 30 thousand km. In the first two seasons of use, the impressions were positive, except for the high noise level when driving on rough asphalt and the "tanning" of tires in early spring and late autumn, when I had not yet changed my shoes for winter. Otherwise, there were no complaints: handling, braking, aquaplaning - everything is great. By the…

I skated 3 summer seasons in the dimension 215/55 r17, the tires were enough for about 60 thousand km, I liked the tires, excellent behavior in any conditions, the tires are light, they save fuel, I didn’t catch hydroplaning, there wasn’t one hernia, there were punctures on treadmills, refurbished. They perfectly hold the road at high speeds, up to 230 km / h, they do not squeak in corners. Of the minuses, this is noise towards the end of wear, the third summer I went and listened to the noise,

Tire size 215-65-16, stand on Toyota Camry. I took tires in St. Petersburg through the Internet store wheel-city in 2022 at a price of 3300 per piece. A week after installation, for the first time I went to the track in the direction of the MSC and felt that the steering wheel was beating, I decided that I would not do much time at home. Three times in different places I did balancing in the last place they said that the reason was the egg-shaped geometry of one wheel (radial runout). I handed…

I have tried many different tires that are 1.5-2 times more expensive, these are in no way inferior in terms of the totality of indicators, but are superior to many. I use on BMW X3 in size 245/50/18. Some pros: For the money, a very decent tire! Balanced out great. Drove one season, great grip in any weather, quite comfortable, acceptable noise. Expectations, after reading the European tests, were justified. Different cons: Everyone writes about rapid wear, after driving 8-10 thousand I didn’t

To be honest, I was amazed. For the price, this is the best deal on the market. At first it seemed a little noisier than the winter Marshall that stood before, but then I got used to it. According to EU standards, the noise level of 2 strips out of three is 70 dB. But it swallows holes and potholes as if they were not there. He practically does not notice the wheel. Handling on wet roads according to the same EU standards is the maximum rating. Not hard at all - I pumped up 18 radius to 2.3 and