. there will be a gap. In this case, the fingers of the hand fit perfectly on the buttons and the wheel. Perhaps the first couple of days it may still seem that the buttons are out of place, but then it seems the other way around. Again, the contrast will be noticeable upon returning to a regular mouse after using this one for a week. Further disadvantages:
Keyboard:
1. Due to compactness, there is no spatial separation of the block with the cursor and the Delete, Home, End, PgUp, PgDown keys from the rest of the keyboard keys. This is of course less convenient than on the MS 4000, but I personally get used to it pretty quickly and do not miss using these keys blindly. In addition, there is a plus, described above in paragraph 9.
2. Function keys (F1-F12) are made painfully narrow, and also tighter to press. It is clear that the goal was to tactilely distinguish these keys from the rest, but not to the same extent! However, you get used to it. Also, either these keys are somewhat developed, or you get used to their stroke and it seems that over time these keys become softer. In general, this is a clear minus for me, but itās clearly not worth bothering about this.
3. No indication of CAPS, NUM, SCROLL, FUNC. I personally don't care. Also, keyboard drivers are shown on the monitor screen when CAPS is pressed.
4. The arm padding is less padded than the MS 4000 and appears to be shorter when in fact it isn't. Initially, it was a little uncomfortable for me, but then you donāt notice it at all.
5. All dust particles are clearly visible on the glossy finish of the keyboard case; it gets unsightly much faster. True, but this case seems to be easier to wipe.
Mouse:
The sensitivity of the mouse is at its best and there were no complaints here immediately. In the remote at first, it seemed that the buttons were not located there. But after a day or two, all claims about the buttons and the wheel disappeared. As a result, on the mouse, I can only add to the minus that it is for right-handers.