Pros
- Very small. 3-4 times smaller than a regular router, it's not clear from the picture. Powerful WiFi, many settings.
Cons
- "Soviet" plastic. There is nothing wrong with this, but it looks unusual compared to modern plastics. It caught my eye.
Pros
- Low price with the highest reliability and excellent quality. - An abundance of functionality that is not available in conventional routers. - Excellent performance. -PoE. - Convenient ate.
Cons
- Wi-Fi does not support 5GHz band.
Pros
- works stable and reliable.
Cons
- for me they are not, though it is difficult to set up.
Pros
- One-time: 7-8 MB / s torrent download (speed is limited by the provider's tariff of 60 Mbps) + 15-17 MB / s local download (could be more, I ran into HDD speed) + watching a video in HD quality + well very fast surf. At the same time, there is a good supply. Menu items are located much more logically than on many devices of the same class. Setting up is not difficult if you know how to read and understand mana, which is enough for this device on the network. I was pleased with the auto-ate of firmware modules. To do this, in the admin panel there is a button "Do it well" and, oddly enough, it works. So many features in one "bottle" that just run your eyes. Even BGP is available, though I don’t have the opportunity to test the performance.
Cons
- not revealed yet
Pros
- Router, took the cheapest for 1700.
Cons
- For the house there would be more ports; Doesn't hang on the wall - I had to make a shelf for mounting.
Pros
- Wide functionality (802.1Q, a bunch of vpn tunnels, traffic shaping, pbr, a bunch of network monitoring tools, mpls, bgp, ospf and a bunch of everything else), powerful wifi, enough power to pump 100Mbps torrents, stability without overclocking at altitude, reasonable price .
Cons
- Insufficient power for traffic shaping (produces something like 60Mbps via torrents with 12 QOS rules and packet mangling), lack of hardware nat (there is a fasttrack, but this is not quite right), power and cooling is not enough for stable operation in overclocked mode (overclocking is supported at up to 750 MHz with a base of 600, it works stably at 650), the lack of hardware acceleration of encryption and, accordingly, low performance with it.
Pros
- Nearly perfect router. Works flawlessly. The interface is intuitive if you clearly know what you need. Uptime for more than a year with a lot of traffic and a raised l2tp server.
Cons
- The main drawback is the impossibility, without understanding the basics of routing, to configure everything with the mouse, like with consumer routers. But this shortcoming passes quickly if you get down to business wisely. There is no wi-fi 5GHz AC, in fairness it should be noted that it did not exist yet when this box was released, and ac appeared in Mikrotiks earlier than others.
Pros
- - reliable - high performance - very rich functionality - convenient winbox client (works without problems through wine)
Cons
- - no ac, 5GHz (will be in the next model - hAP ac)
Pros
- + Does not cut speed. (For the first time I saw my 50+ Mbps in practice, and not on paper) + Ability to fine-tune Qos + Convenient interface where everything is divided into groups + Strong wi-fi (With the possibility of detailed settings, up to signal strength regulation). + A lot of settings, the ability to realize your fantasies (sick :-D) + Huge possibilities in a small box. (Router OS with all the pluses and minuses). + Works for a long time without reboots. + I set everything up once and forgot (in extreme cases, we write export compact in the console, and save the settings in a text document) + Can be configured from the console without using the interface. + Frequent firmware ates (with constant additions, changes, fixes)
Cons
- For such a price and functionality . I don’t even know what to complain about)))) I don’t use a print server, I don’t connect 3G-4G modems. It's funny, but there are simply no shortcomings for me . If you're too picky: - Does not support print server. - There may be problems with 3g-4g modems. - Beeps on reboot, but I think it can be fixed. - There may be problems with incorrect time in the logs (but this is all treated). - Appearance like a doorbell)))) (Aesthetes will not like it) - L2tp is not possible to use without prescribing routes (Route), if you have l2tp and little experience in configuring routers, it will be difficult, but there is sooo much information on setting up on the Internet (would be a desire).
Pros
- Reliability, speed, stability, compactness, power, customizability, European assembly
Cons
- Complexity of settings
Pros
- Works stably. Almost everything is configurable. Supports scripts.
Cons
- Difficult to set up for a non-specialist.
Pros
- The functionality is huge and at the same time works flawlessly, does not cut speed, good Wi-Fi signal, excellent unix-like operating system (RouterOS), absolutely adequate price
Cons
- Not detected
Pros
- An ingenious weight, with such a filling, with such an axle, but for such money. When buying, I thought that it would take at least 30 minutes to set up (I had experience with MikroTik RouterBOARD 750GL) The advantage was the presence of a quick setup, scored a login, password, changed the default passes and you're done)))
Cons
- According to 2022 law, Wi-Fi transmitters with a power of more than 20Dbm must be registered in min. ties XDDDDDDD
Pros
- Powerful and time-tested iron. Endless possibilities for fine-tuning for your tasks (home/office), RouterOS. Outstanding uptime. Hardware WatchDog. PoE. The best offer - price / stability / customization options for a small office / home.
Cons
- After installation and configuration, clients no longer call!
Pros
- Speed, stability, advanced settings, interface
Cons
- 1. Connection problems with beeline settings. 2. There are many settings as a router, but most of them are unnecessary, useless. 3. Really useful functionality, say, open-wrt, is missing. There is not even support for ntfs, fatXX file systems for an external drive.
Pros
- compact, powerful, flexible, non-buggy
Cons
- did not find
Pros
- OS on the Linux kernel (this means that most of the things have long been debugged and they are not buggy and without bugs) The application of any rules and changes are carried out in real time (without reloading) The ability to create any network configuration (the ability to mark packets and create complete chaos) CPU overclocking up to 750MHz The processor is enough for L2TP 100Mbps (beeline) Ultra stable operation Good balancer for multiple WANs Ultra low cost ~3000 rub Router management is possible through a special program (which displays a bunch of statistics, has its own sniffers and scanners, it is possible to connect to the router via MAC address) Set and forget forever
Cons
- At the beginning there is a difficulty in configuring. You need to understand a little about network technologies (on the other hand, there are a lot of examples on the network). Simplifies configuration - application of rules without rebooting the device and statistics, where you can immediately assess whether a packet got there, whether the rule worked.
Pros
- Low price, rich functionality, gigabit ports. The possibilities for setting up the device are very wide, some "buns" are frankly pleasing, such as scripts.
Cons
- There are a number of problems that have not yet been resolved. To begin with, I would like to note that without a bottle and good instructions, it is unrealistic to set up something in it. Then, with WiFi, it’s just some kind of flour, from time to time the traffic just stops, you have to reconnect from the device, no matter how much you searched for solutions on the Internet, there really isn’t any help. A bunch of articles, I tried to change all the settings, you can only do worse, in no article the proposed measures are confirmed by people. It seems that the device has a Wifi scanner, a powerful adjustable transmitter, a lot of settings, and as a result, the Wifi speed floats in the tests. Perhaps the problem is only with apple devices, but this does not make it easier for me. Further, there are problems with some network devices over Ethernet, for example, the UV-AT101 Voice Gateway from onlime, it works fine if it is placed in front of the router, and not after the router, the port speed on Mikrotik is set to 10 Mbps, as a result, the Internet speed suffers. If you rearrange it the other way around, then the voice gateway is not always registered at the "station", it did not dig much into the problem. I remembered, I also wanted to get confused with the script for backing up the config to email, but it doesn’t work normally, because. cannot count it to the end, again a fairly well-known glitch. The latter is treated by a complete flashing of the device, and it is necessary to use the "correct tambourine", while also scoring.
Pros
- 1GB ethernet. 5 independent ethernet ports, which, if desired, can be configured / divided / demarcated as you like. It can do much more than the pre-installed OS of most other routers for the same money.
Cons
- By default, the power was turned on at almost 30 dBm! The option to change the power is not offered on the quick settings page and is hidden in the bowels of the Wireless settings (which is reasonable if adequate default settings were set). Not only does such power require registration on the territory of the 2022, it is simply unhealthy. I'm giving it a two just for that. The web interface is a forest of settings. Perhaps, demanding corporate users need at least a quarter of these settings, for most home and office users for whom this router is positioned, you need to change 20 options at most. For a little more demanding - 50. Why it was impossible to drive rarely used options under the Advanced options tab is completely incomprehensible.
Pros
- many functions, convenient for monitoring what is happening on the network and finding problems
Cons
- for beginners - the complexity of the settings. A separate difficulty with setting up Corbina\Beeline (but everything is solvable)
