- Time spent working
- Fingerprint login does not work properly, only raw firmware is available, and there is no technical help.
- 1. Low cost, but excellent value for the money. 2. a solid construction. 3. Retains a charge for an exceptionally long time. (based by the fact that the second smartphone also functions perfectly)
- After only a few days of ownership, it failed completely. Warranty denied.
- not a huge amount of money
- 2 weeks of use. not yet discovered
- 1) Cute design 2) a screen of superior quality 3)NFC 4) a fingerprint scanner built into the display 5) a battery with a high capacity
- 1) SHELL. It completely negates any and all benefits and is detrimental to everything. It doesn't matter what you're doing with the phone; whether you're browsing the internet, using the player, bringing up the notification curtain, or scrolling through the list of applications, the phone will always perform more slowly than it should. Even with a stationary screen, he would try to go at a more leisurely pace if he could. Even if you close at least all of the applications, the computer will still move more slowly. The prior phone, which used the "stock" version of Android and scored two times less parrots in AnTuTu, operates many times more quickly. Additionally, the phone that was released even earlier (which also ran on stock Android) operated normally without any hiccups. The technology is so complicated that it is nearly difficult to use. 2) the shady business practices of Play Market'a. There are no notifications regarding newly released app updates. It feels like I'm using GPRS to browse the internet because applications load so painfully slowly. It happened more than once that the ates would not download at all, therefore I had to clean the cache on the Play Market. Again, I don't remember after what they did it, but Google themselves optimized the download and installation of ates a few years ago so that on older phones running stock Android, they could be downloaded and installed almost instantly. I don't remember after what they did it. This apparatus is nothing short of a nightmare.
- There is a modification for the 5000 mah battery's 6/128 capacity.
- a processor made by Mediatek, the operation of a fingerprint scanner
- - AMOLED screen. Even with all of its subtleties (PWM, burn-in, acid hues), the picture's clarity, contrast, and overall feel are highly pleasing. - Both the primary and the front cameras are fairly good for the price. - the capacity to function within Wi-Fi networks operating at a frequency of 5 GHz - the capacity to operate within a protected and confidential environment while simultaneously utilizing a dual application profile - The capacity to execute two apps concurrently on a screen that is partitioned in two parts.
- - The camera doesn't have a night mode to use. - Youtube's video playback performance is insufficient overall. As a result of being forced to use the extremely resource-intensive VP9 codec, the device is unable to play 1080p60 video at a speed more than one time its original speed smoothly.
- Nothing remarkable to note
- Small inconveniences
- Batteries, and Super AMOLED.
- On the first day of operation, the front speaker was either damaged beyond repair or, more likely, it did not operate at first (since there was a lot of background noise inside the vehicle and they had to check it using the speakerphone). The phone was sent to quality assurance for inspection.