Great gadget for your money. For those who want to get high-quality surround and powerful sound for little money, I definitely recommend it! Different pros: Quite high-quality sound: low, medium and high frequencies - everything is quite on the level. Build quality and good materials. Ease of construction. Has cons: "Ear" pillows could, of course, be of a larger diameter, but that's how you like it.

I bought this miracle of technology for 500. In terms of price-quality ratio, these headphones have no equal! They reveal their potential with a good source such as a CD deck. Got pros: Detailed fast surround transparent sound. Lightweight and comfortable.3m cable supply. Yellow jack and adapter. Good sensitivity for any source Has cons: A slight decline in the midrange, but for 500r these headphones are a solid advantage!

My unbiased product assessment.With its pros: Long wire. Good sound quality. Comfortable fit. Share price. Got cons: Sound quality for office use only. Not suitable for music.

We needed 2 pairs of budget monitors - I bought them and Panasonic rp-ht 161, Panasonic sounds better. In general, a budget, pass-through model, I would not recommend it for music lovers. Pros: Good ergonomics, sit comfortably. Good soundproofing. To me, they look good on the outside. Cons below: Sound. I listened to flac from the phone, I did not like it at all. The sound is dull and inexpressive.

This is my second pair of these headphones. Great, affordable over-ear headphones. The first ones have worked for 4 years and no problems.

In fact, nothing superfluous, in terms of sound there are hardly many competitors in this price range. I once took it to take at least something, in the end I got used to always walking in them.

Did not meet my expectations from this brand. At the same time, the product is fully consistent with its price and can be recommended as inexpensive headphones with a long enough wire to watch TV or listen to music without disturbing others.

I listen mainly to MPEG, little lossless, or the Internet. For a man who has an elephant in his ear Super ears! If you're not a music lover, you don't have expert hearing, you don't have a tube amp, turntable and reel-to-reel tape recorder, then this is exactly what you need. I recommend! Thanks!

Some pros: The sound for its price is wonderful, very light, do not put pressure on the head, very long wire. Cons: In the hands they feel flimsy, non-removable wire, marking paint is erased, lack of noise reduction.

The general impression is that office headphones are suitable (Skype, conferences), but I do not advise listening to music in them. Some pros: Ergonomic, but quite tight. The ears themselves rotate around the axis of the rim. Rim with interlayer, does not press. The ear wires are good. Cons: Threesome sound. Expected for headphones for 1200. Music lovers are contraindicated. You will hear your favorite songs in them in a new way - and you are unlikely to like it. Not enough treble and b, the…

For normal sound, you need to adjust the equalizer. We take the frequency response and for each frequency we invert the values. In frequency response -2 -> set +2. Either look for the values ​​or follow the link if it is missed . Pro/user-report. Php? id=3251 Pros below: Sounds good, especially for the price. The cable is long, not braided, but flexible and elastic to the touch Cons below: The wire is on both sides (does not interfere), a little pressure on the ears

The HD 180 used to be available, and I just recently purchased two more of these. The sound quality is excellent. I also have the JBL Live 400BT for 5000, the Xiaomi airdots for 1500, and the Phillips for 1500 earphones (I chose them based on the reviews). These synthesizers, in my opinion, are head and shoulders above the rest of the competition. Has pros: The sound is very high, and while the basses do not reach the head, they are also not completely absent. The sound has a really velvety…

Any person who believes that there is no distinction between the 201 and 206 levels is mistaken. When I compared the sound coming from the same source using both versions while holding them in my hands, I was dissatisfied. I hope that warming up, which is something I honestly believe has a 50/50 chance of helping. I am aware that the headphones cost something in the neighborhood of 1,300 dollars; nonetheless, it is unfortunate that the drivers have been updated because they sounded…

I purchased them when they were priced between + 1500 and - 1500, after which I didn't play for a long time and didn't experience any discomfort; but, after playing for approximately 4-5 hours, my ears started to hurt. This issue can be remedied by placing a cape over the ears; alternatively, you might use the hood from a bathrobe. In spite of this, I believe that it offers an excellent value for the money. Below are some advantages: 1. The sound quality is excellent, and all of the in-game…

It's a marvel that you can get headphones for $1,500 that sound like that. I only wanted headphones with a good sound, but the ones I got much beyond my expectations in that regard. I listen to a wide variety of music, watch movies, and play games, and they handle all of their responsibilities with ease. They rest pleasantly on the ears and do not give the impression that the shape has been compressed in any way. The length of the wire has a significant impact on the volume of the headphones…

In overall, the acquisition meets all of the expectations. However, it appears that the only thing that differentiates them from the HD180 is the color of the box; therefore, I am unsure whether or not it is rational to spend more for these. Got pros: Excellent sound quality; all of the instruments are discernible to a high degree. When it is linked to a digital piano, every sound is recreated in exquisite detail. The headphones themselves are of very high quality construction, giving the…

The volume on the computer is constantly turned up to its highest setting, but there are occasions when it is still insufficient. A little over a year later, one of the ears was gone. Glued. After a few months had passed, the second bird took flight. I had to reapply the glue. The shattering of the plastic can, of course, be attributed to careless treatment; but, after about a year, it started to peel off and climb around the leatherette of the ear cushions, and this is unquestionably not my…

I have been making use of them for the past year. In point of fact, I found that to be the optimal way to appreciate it. But I'll begin with the positive aspects. Very nearly of first-rate quality for the cost. As for the sound, I'm not sure if I ran into such a sample on Amazon that required me to download a specialized player. But. The sound is crisp and dignified, but it is lacking in bass and doesn't have a very direct return to the ears. The cost of the headphones is proportional to the…

After having it for more than a year, after about a month and a half of use, one of the ears broke somewhat. There was no particular reason for this; it was just normal wear and tear. when three months, they were utterly unusable when I accidentally dropped them. In general, the assembly is of very poor quality. It gives the impression that its primary purpose was not the enjoyment of musical performance but the creation of a stunning display. Despite the fact that there is not truly much…

Were previously held before to this HD 180. After four years of regular use, the ear pads on the headphones were completely worn down, the insulation on the cables had many areas where it had ruptured, and the headphones did not fit very securely. BUT THEY ARE STILL EFFECTIVE. They are effective even in this form. Regarding this particular model of the HD 206. Because there is more bass than in the 180 model, the sound is less clear; nonetheless, the bass can be sensed much better, and the…