Smartphone ZTE Blade V10 Vita 2/32 GB, Dual nano SIM, graphite black Review

I bought through Amazon, so the price was lower than in stores, but knowing its jambs, it would be better to pay 3 thousand extra and choose something of better quality. The main claim is the battery (almost a day is enough with energy saving on) and the fact that it is impossible to download anything via Wi-Fi, only through mob. Int. I am glad that there is a light indicator - now for some reason it is a rarity. I wrote everything on the camera, I am attaching several summer and winter…

Everything is fine with the phone. The service, together with the phone, recommended buying a protective glass in the kit, which does not fit this device either along or across.

Reviewing my firsthand use.Different pros: For the first smart price performance is adequate Cons: Convex screen (a tribute to fashion) Glitchy WiFi

Since I don’t play games, 3GB of memory is enough for me, the screen is bright, there is a blue filter (! ). Both sims catch 4G, NFC works, though sometimes not the first time. The battery is just a little disappointing. So 4.71 out of 5

Excellent device, high-quality assembly, microphone and speaker at a level more than expensive models, noise reduction works properly, I have already checked it more than once. Has some pros: A smart and inexpensive smartphone with rich functionality, according to which it closely approaching the flagships. Its "chip" was a chic front camera on as much as 32 megapixels. By the way, I don’t complain about the main camera either, it’s double at 16 and 5 Mp, the photos are juicy and with high…

Good entry level phone. I bought my daughter as the first phone. For the price, it's pretty good, if you don't expect miracles from it.

During the first month of operation, it began to spontaneously turn off completely. Until he died completely. And this is for a month. Now under renovation

I needed a smartphone for work and play, and not too expensive. Thoroughly "googling", I settled on the Blade V10 Vita, as the most optimal option. Pros below: Quite a productive novelty. The battery is capacious, 3200 mAh, it lasts for a day of use. Most undemanding toys pull. The screen has a good resolution and high sensitivity, which often helps in games. Good assembly, no creaks anywhere, no backlash, no cracks. Books reads perfectly, scrolling is smooth, without jamming. Almost pure…

I bought my father today for 7990, I wanted to exchange with him, giving him an older Moto G5s, but changed my mind, because. using this device is unrealistic after the attention to detail and care for the user that Motorola offers Pros: Enough performance for those who don't play ROM size Fits comfortably in the hand Availability of NFC Got cons: Housing material Screen resolution Front-camera Inconvenient management in the firmware They are really not comfortable to use, many functions are…

All in all, not a bad phone. Only one speaker is used for sound. For listening to music and making calls. But for me it is not critical, I listen to music only in headphones. To achieve a good sound, I installed the vlc player, as it has a built-in equalizer.

In general, the phone pleases. And if you do not use the functions described in the "disadvantages", then feel free to add a point, or even one and a half) This phone, after the budget Samsung, pleased with the performance and amount of memory. (I installed all the applications that were on the old phone and also installed those that I wanted, but did not fit before and there was more than 40GB of space left. In principle, you can not install a memory card. And it can be configured either as a…

Performance on the top five, I did not feel any problems with programs and brakes of the RAM. The price-quality ratio is fully justified. According to external indicators, the smartphone is neat, lightweight, fits comfortably in the hand despite the display is larger than 6 inches. Video on youtube loads quickly and plays without brakes. Timekiller toys also go without problems. Total: more than just a dialer, optimal functionality (but without NFC, alas) and the right price. Impressions are…

Optimal hardware, features and price. I have a version without NFC (I don’t use it, I don’t see the point). There is a fingerprint scanner (you can also put gesture control on it, launch applications), face recognition (I haven’t really tested it yet, but it seems to know :), LTE is stable. The speaker is loud, calls are heard everywhere, the interlocutor during a call too. Mobile Internet is powerful, does not fall off (where my old phone used to be stupid). There are no complaints about the…

Comment: I give a free life hack to parents of teenagers - these are the smartphones you need to take to your children if you want to avoid unnecessary expenses. Firstly, the price of a smartphone in itself hits only a very poor budget. At the same time, its appearance and set of functions are sufficient so that the image of your child does not suffer. In addition, the last android out of the box means that the phone will work for at least a year without any special lags, with proper handling…

In general, the model is pleasant. If there is no need to use WiFi, the choice is not bad. If there is - hell and pain. The download speed constantly jumps from 2Mbps to no more than 8Mbps, while the v7 blade has 40Mbps at the same point in the room. When viewing full hd over the network, after about 5 minutes, the WiFi module falls off, only WiFi reactivation helps.

Some pros: Price. Bought with a promo code. All the features you need at a reasonable price. The best performance in its segment. Cons below: For transport, weak sound in wired headphones. I bought wireless f9 on Ali Express and installed a Pi player. Everything is great.

I was looking for a smartphone with a limited budget. For this price with such characteristics, I did not find an alternative. Memory 3/64 - for other brands, prices start at 15tr. Unisoc processor, lots of good reviews about it. The IPS screen is 19:9, the droplet notch is also cool and the smartphone looks at least twice as expensive. Overall, I'm happy with my choice, and I'm happy that I spent a reasonable amount of money on a great smartphone.

in general, when I bought the phone, I understood that I would be waiting for the then 7500. and the phone was needed urgently. performs its functions in principle. but God forbid, you want something more from him. software was written by three cripples, in the dark, without electricity and in different parts of the world, without communicating with each other. if you need the most ordinary phone, just to surf the internet, call with NFS, then you can. but the bugs are not worth it. It would be

For a not too demanding user - social networks, light games, sometimes listen to music / watch videos. The phone suited me 100% For a little over a year everything was fine, but the camera suddenly stopped working. The service center said that it needs to be changed, but there are no spare parts, I had to look for it myself. However, replacing it did not help. I do not want to leave the phone in repair for an indefinite period and with a small chance of success. According to the master - if…

Good smartphone. I use it as a second, at work + on vacation, I take business trips. It's inexpensive and holds a charge well. Not wow on autonomy, but in the middle of the day you will not be left without a mobile phone. Works in 4G, mobile internet nimble, does not hang. The display is large, so it is very comfortable to work, and in in terms of speed, and in terms of ergonomics, the eyes do not get tired. I can also note the camera - good for such a price.