The tires were on the car from the factory, perhaps on purpose some kind of factory order is cheaper, because they are tough and noisy. Different pros: Slow wear. More than 40,000 km have been covered in harsh conditions, and you can still drive for some time before the lighthouses appear. Cons below: Very noisy, very hard - they transmit all the bumps to the body. Compared to winter non-studded Viking 6s - just the wildest rumble on any pavement.

In general, it did not live up to expectations . I bought it for comfort and did not receive it. I am partly to blame myself, I was greedy at 215/55 16 and took 215/60 16. Too high a profile, on the track in long fast corners it does not hold the trajectory, scours and shifts from side to side. In principle, controllable, but extremely unpleasant. Even standing still, if you swing sharply, vibrations are felt. I wouldn't say quiet. Not much quieter than the winter studded Gislaveds…

I have a Volkswagen Golf 6. ContiPremiumContact 5 195/65/15 are slightly quieter than stock EcoContact 3 tires (Czech Republic) of the same size with a mileage of about 15 thousand km. - I specifically compared the noise from the DVR recording on the same route. But the miracle did not happen - I thought it would be even quieter. But the tires are really not noisy, even on rough pavement. - As for comfort - these tires have exactly the same softness as the previous EcoContact 3, only the…

at the beginning it doesn’t matter what you mean by water or asphalt), it rides like it’s on rails, at the end with a profile of 1-2 mm in the rain no more than 80 km / h in corners (where there are no ruts and deep puddles) in general, if it had lasted longer, then without hesitation I would have bought it. For those who have mileage per year does not exceed 10,000, the best tires. worth the money for sure. 3 months went with the remnants of a nail in the rubber did not let down .

My husband and I, for confidence in the choice, decided to study the market of manufacturers and their range. When selecting tires, the main indicators were taken into account: handling and braking on dry and wet pavement, noise level. After a long study, we made our choice - this is ContiPremiumContact 5, for people who love comfort, we can recommend these tires. Young riders and extreme sports enthusiasts should look elsewhere, this is a comfort tire. We are happy with our choice and highly…

The first two years of operation, and this is about 40,000 km, the behavior of the tires was 100% satisfactory. I was somewhat embarrassed by the large roll during high-speed passage of sharp turns. At first I thought that the reason for this was the peculiarities of the suspension settings, but when I “tried on” tires with a rigid sidewall, I realized that the suspension had nothing to do with it. Yes, the sidewall is too soft, and it gave me a lot of trouble - I often moved along "somewhat"…

VAZ2112 car. Before that, I rolled Nokian i3 for 3 seasons (wonderful tires, only the hydroplaning resistance after the 2nd season practically disappeared, rolled into a slick), I tried the Mishka energy saver (it didn’t roll at all - it’s hard and noisy). After this rubber (Kontikov 5's) you don't want another one. Chose between her and Bridge Turanza T001. ContiPremium5 is not quiet, it is silent! On roads with paths, small potholes, it swallows without noise and vibration - just a song.…

Mazda 6 car (147 hp), the car was shod in the Hankook tire in the summer. I really liked the tires, the car went on rails, behaved well both on dry and wet surfaces. For this season, I also wanted to take Ventus, but having traveled the winter on Kontik, I decided to consider them. Having studied various tests, I decided to stop on this model. Make no mistake! Everything that I liked in the old hankuk is here, plus the car has become really quieter (there is no Shumka in the Mazda at all and…

The ContiSportContact that came from the factory on my C-Max after 4 years already required replacement. Before buying, I read a bunch of rubber tests, including foreign ones. I decided to take this particular rubber - the winner or prize-winner of all possible tests over the past 2 years (the model appeared only in 2022). There was only one set in stock in the city. 205/55 R16 91H turned out to be made in the Czech Republic, and immediately I was very alerted by the softness of the sidewalls…

This is just kapets, I will not write obscene language here! Rubber is like an eraser, erased from sight! I bought it in May 2022, and in July 2022 it was already tattered, worn to the cord! This despite the fact that the winter I go to spikes. As a result, the tires ran no more than 25 tkm and ended up in a landfill! Do not buy in any case, this is a scam. Its pros: Dignity - keeps the road well while new. And it still holds a blow well - hernias did not come out. That's all. Got cons: Noisy…