Video card GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti D5 4G (rev1.0/rev1.1/rev1.2) (GV-N105TD5-4GD), Retail Review

A modern analogue of the GTX760. Even in tests, they are on par with each other. The card is very cold. The fan only turns on when the GPU temperature exceeds 60 degrees. The temperature did not rise above 64 degrees.

Bought in December. The fan works, the card does not. In support I asked what to do, they sent me to the official workshop for repair and non-repair of their product. Even in support they asked me to write “how it went”, I will definitely write when something happens.

Took for 12k. For the g4560 for the eyes, plus or minus fresh games of the Tarkov level and the like, an acceptable 50 fps. Do not take more than 13-15k The cooler died at the age of 2 after the launch of cyberpunk. Still running on the replaced cooler.

I just bought it on the secondary market for $6,500; it would have cost me $12,000. You can purchase a secondhand 1066 for around $13,000, give or take. If you move carefully and have a guarantee, you can get it for these grandmas. In terms of the actual card. All games up to 2022 are generally tasty. This is likely now the bare minimum for newer games to run at full high definition. In the same vein, You'll need to significantly lower the settings in The Evil Within 2 if you want to maintain a

I took it recently on the secondary for 6500, in the store twice as expensive. For 13,000 plus or minus, again, it’s better to look for a used 1066, I think slowly with a guarantee you can get it for these grandmas. As for the card itself. Games up to 2022 mostly eat well. For modern games in Full HD, this is probably the minimum now. Let's take the same The Evil Within 2, in order to achieve at least a stable 30 fps, you will have to greatly reduce the settings. The last Tomb Rider pulls at…

March 2022 ate Good card. I wanted to take the rx470, but it costs 5 thousand more with good cooling (it was back in 2022) So the choice fell on the 1050 Ti. Paired with i3-4160, 16 Gb ram (dual mode) at a resolution of 1440x900 I have: 1) 40-50 fps in The Witcher 3 on beyond (without lush hairs Roach Hairworks from Nvidia), 2) GTA 5 at very high without anti-aliasing 60-80 fps is stable, in forests and grasses fps is about 35-45, 3) Battlefield 1 on ultra and multicom at 64 helmets no longer…

Because it is an affordable gaming alternative, I decided to purchase this video card. I am not a gamer very often. When in multimedia mode, the video card is muted, there is no audible choking, and the fans do not turn on. On my version, the Micron memory is trying to reach 8008 MHz without increasing the voltage (I haven't tested it again), but I don't need it because the performance is already sufficient for my needs. Buying is something I highly encourage doing.

I liked it, I bought it primarily for working in 3d and video editing, and I'm satisfied with it. Of course, I would like it to be more powerful, but products with that level of capability typically cost twice as much and demand twice as much power. There is support for rendering in CUDA. For semi-professional work, it is pretty suitable. Got pros: Because the propeller only turns when there is enough load, there is no need for any additional power, so the boat is completely silent. TDP 75W…

A decent graphics adapter that won't break the bank. Works with both high and medium settings for all games. When paired with an i3 8100, it delivered solid results. The maximum FPS in CS:GO is 280, and it dips to 140 when kneading; on average, the frame rate is 200. I cranked Dying Light's settings to maximum and the game ran well without any hiccups, but after about an hour of play, my video card overheated and the game crashed again. I bought it for $12,200, which is way too much because her

With its pros: The perfect balance of price and quality, although I don’t recommend you take a new one, overpay, it was possible for 4-5 years, right now, no. Some cons: "Stub", Design, Cooling (current if you want to overclock the card over the factory, the problem is only this version),

I bought this video card as a budget gaming option, because. I rarely play games. In multimedia modes, the video card is silent, the chokes are not audible, the fans do not turn on. On my copy, the Micron memory is chasing up to 8008 MHz without raising the voltage (I haven’t tried it again), but I don’t need it, the performance is already enough. I recommend to buy.

Has pros: It is this model that is an office plug, such as a light version, take it with two coolers, the temperature will not rise above 47 degrees Its cons: Just run it on a stress test and you will understand that one cooler is not enough to load this card

but I had no choice. The goal of an inexpensive system unit is to play minimally until the madness with prices ends . (maybe it will end .)

In all modern games, fps at 1920x1080 does not drop below 40. Skyrim SE on ultra settings produces a stable 60 fps. The Witcher 3 drops down to 30 frames only on ultra settings, but in general it gives out 45-50 - quite playable for an undemanding player. Impressions are excellent. I was especially pleased with the overclocking potential - in boost the card holds more than 2 GHz. The memory works stably at a frequency 25% higher than the stock one.

Decided not to buy a Chinese noname, bought a gigabyte and what did you get? Cullen doesn't spin. For especially talented people, it does not spin even at temperatures of 50 and 75 and 95. Unfortunately, I didn’t notice it right away, 15 days have passed, now crap with service centers and other troubles. Extremely disappointed! Gigabyte has quality at the level of Chinese noname!

I liked it, I bought it specifically for working in 3d and video editing, I’m satisfied, of course I would like it to be more powerful, but they are twice as expensive, and they also require twice as much power. Rendering in CUDA is supported. For semi-professional tasks, it is quite suitable. Got pros: Silent, since the propeller only spins when there is sufficient load, no additional power is needed. TDP 75W. Enough for games, and for 3d programs and video editing. Has cons: With the same…

The video card is a bomb! The video card is already 2 years old and it still works as if it is 1 month old! It plays games such as GTA5 Duum 2022 Wolfenstein 2022 and all this at high-medium settings ! In general, buy it! (There is no GTA 5, Duum and Wolfenstein etc. I passed all these games :))

In principle, a good video card for a budget computer. Runs all games at high and medium settings. In conjunction with the i3 8100, it performed well. In csgo, the maximum is 280 FPS and drops to 140 when kneading, the average is 200 FPS. In Dying light, I turned everything to the maximum, the game went without brakes, for a maximum of an hour of play, you can catch a second freeze due to the heating of the video card. I took it for 12200, I think that this is a very overpriced price for her…

I got into the building, ated the firewood and flew without any dances with a tambourine. Cool vidyuha, yes, of course, you can add 3 thousand and buy 1060. But for me, this graphics card copes with everything by 5 points. I have wow in the open world at ultra 90-115 fps. Average 100, 100 fps Carl. In pvp or raid 60-70. For me, these are very good indicators. In GTA, a little less than the maximum settings of 60 frames. I also tested Dark souls 3, I expected at least 40 fps on ultra, but I got…

some tests with ryzen 7 2700x with full hd Battlefield 1 at ultra ~60fps The Evil Within 2 low settings ~ 30-60fps Outlast 2 ultra settings ~ 60 fps Crysis 2 ultra settings ~60 fps DIshonered 2 low settings ~ 35-60fps Vampyr ultra settings 50-60fps With its pros: Unexpectedly cold, powerful and compact graphics card for the price I thought that due to the size the cooling system would be worse, but there are not even hints of overheating No need for additional power, pulls almost all modern…