Video card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 8G (rev. 1.0/1.1), Retail Review

I am satisfied with the performance, not satisfied with the build quality and gigabyte support service. I wrote a gigabyte support in those, there I got answers to off. In general, I personally have a residue from this brand and I will try to stay away from it. Pros below: Price, for 25k you get: average fps 290+ in cs go at maximum settings 1920x1080 Destiny 2 did not measure, but everything is very good escape from the tarkov about average fps on max settings Got cons: Build quality is…

Solving the problems of a powerful video card with a clumsy cooling system: ∞MSI Afterburner. ∞ Set Powerlimit to 80% or lower (dancing with a tambourine in manual undervolting mode did nothing - read below about override GPU settings). ∞ Performance does not drop, but noiselessness in OPTIMIZED games and applications (BUT! ) ∞ There are games that ignore the limits: FrostPunk loads the graphics card to 80 degrees already in the start menu, somehow overriding the settings of MSI Afterburner…

There is a suspicion that gigabite has stopped making good video cards, since I used to have a 1050ti and even though the fans were spinning at 100%, they did not make unpleasant sounds. My brother bought a 1660ti from the same company and the same problem, gave it back under the guarantee, added 2022 and bought the same model only from msi, there is no such noise with it.

I decided to turn on the fans by installing a case cooler, which blows lightly on the card and does not allow reaching the threshold temperature. Some pros: 1. Good price-performance ratio. 2. Quiet enough, that is, the noise is heard under load, but does not cause much discomfort. Got cons: 1. Relatively high temperatures, around 80C under load. 2. At idle above 45C, the fans constantly turn on, this happens with an unpleasant click and is not comme il faut at all.

I had to ate the video card in May 2022. I chose for a long time, painfully, shoveled a bunch of reviews and reviews. Based on the budget and the psychological barrier, this card was essentially the only option. On that moment. I knew about the numerous complaints with high temperatures and noisy chokes, but, again, there was nowhere to retreat - I needed a map. In principle, I did not take it from my hands, but from the officials - in the CSN. Clean, zero, not used, 3 year warranty, first…

The card was taken primarily not to play the rays, but to work with a blender. It heats up to 83 degrees. At the maximum speed of the fans, there is the usual noise that you can live with, but at 75% they buzz in a certain pattern, a kind of pulsation, and this sound is really annoying. Both of these problems (would) be solved by undervolting the card and limiting the fan speed to somewhere around 60-65% until high temperatures are reached. But there is one more jamb. When rendering scenes in…

In full hd, everything goes on ultra settings (except perhaps for RDR 2). I tried RTX in Battlefield 5, it eats a lot, but the rays themselves were not particularly impressed. Haven't tried it in other games. Temperatures strain, in principle, the maximum operating temperature is 89 degrees, the card does not reach it, but at maximum load and even maximum cooler speeds it holds 80 degrees. I myself reduced the Power Limit in MSI Afterburner to 90 percent and made an overclocking autoscanner…

I put 4 only because of the consideration of the price at which this video card was purchased. In mid-July, the uena amounted to something around 35-36 thousand. For this cost, you will get a fairly productive card at the rtx 3060 level. FPS in games on both cards will be for. But, there is a fat but. This is cooling. The graphics card consistently hits 80 degrees in a normal six-turn case. At the same time, the coolers spin at 100% and create such an ion noise. Everything else is good. Where…

Pros below: Not a bad card, due to RTX technology it gives more FPS in games. Has cons: It heats up to 70. Enough only for full HD resolution. On 2k you already have to "play" with the settings

Great card in terms of performance. At the level of 1080ti, it falls short of it, in fairness. It allows you to play all existing games at near-top settings in FHD. The main problem with the $500 card is the cheap bearings in the coolers. I don't know what Gigabyte engineers thought, didn't they really conduct tests, but if the video card is in the traditional horizontal position, then the coolers make a terrible and annoying noise, especially in certain ranges. As soon as you turn the card…

Some pros: Overall performance at this price point took at a time when the was 62r + Silence on the first + lack of whistles on the first Got cons: -Deshman plastic -few monitor inputs. - noisy card after a month of use - heats up to 85 in toys - began to fly out in games .

I took the card as the best option in terms of price and performance. The Super prefix speaks of a slight overclocking by default right out of the box. Unlike the usual 2060, this video card has an increased number of memory power phases, so the video memory here works faster and there is more of it. The graphics core runs at higher frequencies. Numerous tests by specialists have shown that this card is slightly more powerful than the 2070, but weaker than the 2070 Super. I'm quite happy with…