Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 92
  • 5
    66
  • 4
    18
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    3

Type of review

The comparison was with Maxxis premitra HP5, sizes 215/65-16. This initially high size curvy wheels are more comfortable on rough roads as the padding smooths out bumps while maintaining the suspension. For 1.5 months I drove on tires 8000. Depreciation is minimal so far. In Derbent with dense parking to the curb in the dark when I ran into a corner and pierced the sidewall of the tire in one blow in 2 places with a distance between the holes of 4-5 cm (that is, the sidewall folded in half upon

Pros
  • Survived after the Dagestan mountain gravels. I really noticed the savings, but this is 300 ml. per 100 km, compared to the previous ones, less noisy, comfortable speed in terms of noise has shifted 30 km up, I'm talking about the highways of St. Petersburg Msk. After installation, I went from St. Petersburg to Derbent and the surrounding area.
Cons
  • At a speed of 40-60 on the concrete, a rumble was heard from the slaps of a small tread, like itching or something. It seems that if the manufacturer gets rid of the cause of this noise, this will lead to greater savings. Visually Very thin sidewall, which in principle can lead to a hernia after some impact on it.

I read reviews here on the market and bought these tires 185/65 R15. I bought it consciously, although I know that they will wear out quickly, that they will last for 2 seasons and all that. I live in Crimea. While there was no strong heat, I can not assess how they behave in the heat. I decided to ride them for a month before changing to winter ones, the temperature is now about 5-15 degrees. Strength and wear resistance can not be assessed, because. I use little. PS: before that I had Pirelli

Pros
  • They hold the road well, 100-120 without tension at all, you can go. Traveled on dry and wet primer, on dry and wet asphalt. Quiet, comfortable - well, it's understandable, they're new, I just bought them.
Cons
  • they said at the tire shop, and according to reviews they write that they will quickly be erased. As a matter of fact, I don't know.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is okay, it's not a waste of money!

I bought a set in size 185/60/R14 made in the Philippines, I can add my five cents. The rubber is noisy, soft, the suspension has become softer to smooth out our ideal roads . In handling, I don’t know what to call it, some kind of unpredictable steering behavior at speeds up to 40 km / h, the tires walk along the rut of the road surface. At speeds from 40 km / h, handling is better, it does not lose stability in corners. It's too early to judge by wear and tear, the first season. Bought to…

Pros
  • Handling, cornering stability.
Cons
  • Noise.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

I chose summer tires in the dimension 215/50 R17 with a load index of 95 and in the budget up to 5 for a balloon, and in this budget, as it turned out, apart from Chinese rubber, there is nothing to choose from, there is only Gislaved Ultra Speed ​​2 and this Yokohama Bluearth ES32 tire model. Initially I thought to buy the first option, because. I have experience using winter tires of this brand, but my friends dissuaded me from them and advised me to take Yokohama. As a result, they told me…

Pros
  • Very quiet, relatively soft, wear resistant, low rolling resistance.
Cons
  • Haven't found it yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

I put it on Skoda Yeti after the factory Continental Premium Contact 2 215/60 r16, which lasted more than 5 years. The mileage was small, about 65 thousand km (along with winter tires), but they required replacement. I noticed that the car became quieter and more comfortable on the new Yokohama. Drove a little over 5 thousand km. So far I'm happy with the tires. Let's see how it will show itself in longer operation.

Pros
  • Quiet, comfortable tires. Excellent value for money.
Cons
  • Not found.

YOKOHAMA ES32 size 205/55/16. Tires selected for replacement instead of factory-installed and end-of-life YOKOHAMA Advan A460. Impressions from ES32 are very positive. Inexpensive, comfortable, quiet tires (relative to the A460, they are very noticeably quiet). Made in 2022. And this is perhaps the only small drawback. I would like, of course, that the tires were foreign-made. Since installation, the mileage is about 2022 km. During this time, no complaints. Absolutely everything suits. A…

Pros
  • Price. Quality. Comfort - quiet and not hard. Handling on both dry and wet pavement raises no objections. Low rolling resistance - a very perceptible, clear increase in vehicle rolling.
Cons
  • So far not discovered.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I'm not an expert in tires) but I liked everything. Rubber changed before the trip from Hong Kong to the Crimea. Total mileage 5800 on our 2022 roads. There were all types of coverage along the way. Asphalt, bad asphalt, very bad asphalt, its complete absence, rain, and sand. I especially liked how these tires behaved between Hong Kong and Tikhoretsk, where there are a lot of dead roads. Bumps and pits swallow well, there were a couple of flights right into good pits, no hernias popped up…

Pros
  • Much less noise compared to the Matodor that I used to have on my Ford. Doesn't float on the road. Confidently keeps in a rut. On a wet track, getting into small puddles, I didn’t feel any planning.
Cons
  • Until I discovered

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Normal quality, you can use it.

Pros: Relatively low price, good durability, good handling on dry and wet pavement. 4 seasons of 25 thousand km for mitsubishi carisma, opel vectra - for mom, 3 seasons and 30 thousand for reno fluence for dad, one burst wheel for the entire period of operation. Again I take such a bate and sister. Because good value for money. You won't find better for this money. And no rubber is intended for 2022 roads, so it is impossible to count on high reliability on any rubber. Has some cons: Wear resis

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect product for any user!

I bought it on a VAZ 2110 in 2022 (tires also in 2022), while the first season went, it got on the wheels perfectly, loads min. 5 max. 25 depending on the wheel, everything is smooth. I kept the road at + 5С perfectly in 90 turns, I didn’t break the feed into a skid, there was no squeal of rubber, it doesn’t make noise on asphalt, I haven’t seen wet asphalt yet, but judging by the tread, there will be no problems. I've only just started using it, if something goes wrong, I'll write it in the…

Pros
  • Cost, softness.
Cons
  • We cook

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

There were already 2 of the same before, 2 years ahead. Behind Yokohama, too, were erased, only A-001, he took them in return. Put the new ones on the front, front on the back. On the highway, the road is excellent in both wet and dry, the speed is 100-110 km / h. They don't make noise. The sidewall does not burst like on Nokia. Average wear . For 2 years (20,000 km), 2 mm have worn off on the front end. I am satisfied, I will continue to take them. My son-in-law also put the same ones on a…

Pros
  • Quiet, good road holding
Cons
  • No

Going from size 185 to 195 slightly raised the car by 7 mm, which was a pleasant surprise. Since the tire in general has increased in diameter and has become 14 mm larger, we divide in half, we get the coveted 7 mm. As the tire configurator shows, this increase slightly changed the speedometer reading, lowering the actual speed When the speedometer reads 100 km/h, the actual speed is 102.3 km/h (2.3% more) The wheel is 5 mm (0.2') closer to the suspension and brake system parts . Suitable for…

Pros
  • 3 years without stopping on concrete Hong Kong 50,000 mileage wear 50% satisfied with tires! Roll forward! Profitability! Quiet! Comfortable! Lifting! The tire on the second generation Hyundai Solaris, after installation, underwent a balancing and camber ritual, which did not reveal any deviations. Size 195*65*15*91V Instead of regular Gumho Kumho Solus KH17 185/65 R15 88H, they got their own alloy wheels. As you noticed, gentlemen, there is a difference in size and it differs from the size recommended by the Hyundai manufacturer. But in our conditions, given the rigid suspension of the Solaris, the new tires proved to be a smoother, quiet, economical ride with good performance both on dry surfaces and on wet roads! What was really noticeable right away was (soft) not in terms of the fact that the tire material itself is soft (although it is also not hard), but the behavior of the car at the joints and road surfaces of different heights. The tires are really quiet compared to the original Gumnho coming from the car from the factory. The natives fell into disrepair after about two and a half years of operation with a range of 60,000 km. Also, after installation, a significantly increased roll forward was clearly visible! With a clearly increased coasting, fuel consumption also decreased by about 800 grams to 1 liter per 100 kilometers (depending on conditions) Now about the size! The size was selected specifically in a similar way, as in our region there are both climbs and stones. 3 years without stopping in Hong Kong 50,000 mileage wear 50% satisfied with tires!
Cons
  • There are none, except for the fact that it collects small stones, although this is not particularly a disadvantage. pebbles do not cling, probably only bald worn tires))

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

After Bridgestone, who was 11 years old for a minute (yes, I don’t ride much skated 90-100 thousand on it) I decided to look for a Japanese with good performance. Based on reviews, I settled on Ekohame, I barely found my size 185/70 R14. Ordered, received. Surprised by the production of 2022 and for June 21 - rubber produced in May 19, maybe it was discontinued already? . I took a chance. put. Very soft and quiet. No vibration at all, car runs like new. We also have to drive on gravel roads…

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, price
Cons
  • The protector constantly catches large stones

I bought it in the winter of 2022, I am one of those people who prepares a sled in the summer and a cart in the winter, since my Bridgestone EP-150 asked for retirement. Rubber - made in 2022. I have been eyeing this rubber for a long time, choosing in the range up to 3500 per cylinder. There were few options, but in the end I decided to try Yokohama, as I had long wanted to try this Japanese manufacturer. They put tires on my old alloy wheels of 15 radius (I took 185/65 R15 tires), they…

Pros
  • 1) Soft + comfortable. 2) On the road behaves confidently. 3) Brakes very well, especially on wet surfaces. 4) Almost does not feel the rut on the road. 5) Balanced with a minimum amount of cargo. 6) Very good grip on wet surfaces.
Cons
  • 1) Still a bit noisy on various asphalt surfaces.

they use this rubber on a Honda Civic 4d 9th generation sedan, the suspension is moderately stiff, so I chose rubber with a soft sidewall. I chose tires all winter, wooling the Internet, as a result, the choice fell on this one and did not regret it after the winter, I immediately felt the difference as soon as I left the tire fitting shop, the directional stability and steering sharpness became like on a factory bridgestone, but at the same time, the car does not feel much softer than…

Pros
  • soft, quiet
Cons
  • for the price they just don't exist.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

For ten years I have been waiting for Yokohama to have quiet 2022 summer tires in the budget segment. I was just about to "escape" to Nitto, Toyo or even much better, but it didn't work out. It’s even scary somehow - I changed Yokohama winter shoes for Yokohama summer, and the nasty loud rumble of summer tires did not appear. As if he hadn't changed. Well, was it possible? Cho, China is stepping on its heels? And the tread is even a little higher from the new one.) Well, let's see how it goes…

Pros
  • Quiet tires
Cons
  • Early to speak. I'm only driving for a day.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

You can list the advantages through the experience of tires that were previously and it is not possible to describe tires that you yourself have not ridden. The car in this process is not the last place. we buy tires for the car. Rolled on cars of different tires of different brands. There was Samnd (Peugeot 405), there was Lada Granta and Ravon R3 (Chevrolet Aveo). This is for the last 7 years. Tires in the summer were Pirelli Formula Energy, Yokohama Bluearth AE01, Toyo Nano Energy 3 and now…

Pros
  • Read the comment in full and it will become a little clearer why Yokohama Bluearth ES32 185/65 R15 88H is my choice and the best emotions when driving. 1) Handling and confidence on any road. 2) Does not feel rutting - this is the most important indicator for me. 3) Durable, not killed on bad roads. 4) Quiet with a pleasant sound passing asphalt joints. 5) Splashes in a puddle fly from the car not onto the glass, but onto the side of the road. 6) Bulk, available in most stores. 7) They go for a long time, up to 1.5 millimeters of the tread they behave perfectly. 8) Appearance is pleasant. 9) Extended warranty from Yokohama for 1 year. 10) In any weather in rain or heat or a dirt road - CONFIDENCE in movement. It's important for me. 11) Brakes confidently on any surface, in any weather and any wear.
Cons
  • Not the lightest in weight.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I bought a fresh set of the 20th year 195/65 R15. I haven’t set it yet, as it’s still cold and snowing, so I’ll add it later. But in general, the tires really liked the touch and visually. Someone writes that they sold him stale rubber and lowers the rating without realizing that he himself is an idiot if he did not look at what the store was selling to him. The choice fell on her because of the advice of the master. It turned out all 11900. I will add how I ride at least a little.

Pros
  • Soft sidewall Interesting tread pattern
Cons
  • -

The previous tires were Continental Premium contact 205/55 r16, worked 60.000 with a seasonal run of 10.000. the price of rubber was in the region of 6.000 per wheel. Rubber already belongs to the Premium class, I don’t want to be capricious, but I have not been delighted with it since new. New tires So far pleases! The cost is almost two times lower than my old rubber! Noise less, softer when driving on rough asphalt! Some owners after a short period of use write that the rubber is noisy…

Pros
  • 1 Price 2 manufacturing quality 3 not noisy 4 road behavior and handling
Cons
  • Friends, read the reviews of people who bought tires in the budget class and in the Premium class. Each consumer find their shortcomings. In this rubber, I did not find anything that could be capricious!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

I changed the rubber due to hernias, the old one still had a good tread. I took rubber in the middle price category, I was surprised by the quality, the steering wheel began to spin easier, therefore the grip became worse, I thought, but no. With an intensive start, the wheels almost did not slip, and with sharp braking it brakes perfectly (when buying new tires, I always look at how it behaves during a sharp start and braking). On the track well kept not swimming speed 140-160km / h, confident

Pros
  • Excellent grip, the steering wheel has become noticeably easier to spin compared to the old one.
Cons
  • not yet discovered