1 Level
3 Review
0 Karma
Review on ARNO by jose bolivar
Diversifying the use of carbon in batteries
Power consumption is an unavoidable necessity. However, some generation processes and energy sources are detrimental to the environment and are highly costly, which has an impact on the rise in prices of derivative products purchased by the final consumer.
In the case of carbon-based battery production, the founders of the ARNO project saw a solution to create energy and underlying products from the use of nano-derived materials, promoting nanotechnology.
The founders of ARNO consider that nanomaterials are highly useful in the development of many solutions applicable in different areas of the industry and in our daily lives. This also influences the reduction of costs for manufacturing batteries and subsequent products, which benefits both suppliers and end users of said items.
To support their project, the founders have turned to foreign organizations and in the European Union that support their theory and that provide the necessary logistical, scientific and financial support to lay the foundations of the ecosystem through the cryptoactive ARNO. This has allowed the advancement of research in laboratories, the legalization of intellectual property and international agreements for the standardization of battery manufacturing methods based on nanomaterials.
Seen in this way, we can conclude that ARNO brings positive consequences both for manufacturers, consumers, the environment and for investors who want to promote this new technology model through its ARNO token.
๏ปฟ
๏ปฟ
Pros
- Allows lowering the cost of manufacturing carbon batteries
- Encourages the production of suppliers of carbon inputs and derivatives
- Reduces the selling prices of batteries
- Promotes energy transformation to create new products
Cons
- No disadvantages
