Review on OneLedger by LUIS RIVERO R
Operation in other chains and contracts
This network focuses on interoperability in various chains, reorganizing current structures. But these types of projects already have many similar cases or proposals that have similarities to OneLedger.
-Atomic exchanges between chains, eliminating centralized intermediaries. Reducing costs and problems related to the custody of funds.
-He has a big problem ahead since now decentralized exchanges are booming, which to some extent detracts from the importance and use of projects like this.
OneLedger As a platform it technically offers great improvements in scalability and compatibility, however, due to its low use, not all its features have been tested in real time. Generally in simulators.
- There are already atomic exchanges, it is possible to find this type of exchanges in multiple projects. This would be your greatest service offered.
-Offers side chains that the end user or company can create and synchronize with other blocks.
In general this platform does not offer new solutions, it is possible to find several projects with similar characteristics, although this already has its maimnet, its benefits are not well known in some sites. You need better dissemination, the service they offer does not have the desired performance.
This project seems stagnant and without growth.
Pros
- Compatibility with other block chains.
- Decentralized Atomic Exchanges
- Enhanced scalability
- Possibility of creating lateral intelligent contracts and are compatible with other chains.
Cons
- There are projects that work on this protocol.
- There are currently decentralized exchanges, reducing the possibilities of OneLedger.
- There are already several atomic exchanges.
- Roadmap poorly supported on what they want to achieve.
- Project seems stagnant and without growth.
