three lenses were tried out in the store. The other two turned out to be fairly good, while one had a front focus. A pretty good lens for $16,000 (cost of the version without VC). 20222 rubles. Since the absence of a stub is not at all important at focal lengths of 17–50mm, I don't think it makes sense to get an image stabilized version. More like a marketing gimmick from Tamron. You can purchase a Tokina AT-X 165 f/2.8 Pro DX for the same amount of money. The Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 is optically comparable to this lens, and it is even slightly less sharp when the aperture is wide open, but it has a nice "plastic" image and a superbly branded metal construction, which makes it popular on the secondary market. Unlike Tamron, which may be sold for just a penny after a few years of service. Simply put, I didn't feel honored to purchase this lens.
New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction 📷 Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs
104 Review
Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review
📷 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review