Tamron A16NII 17 50Mm Aspherical International Review

Below are some advantages: Lightweight, lightning-quick, and equipped with an optical stabilizer and ultrasonic motor. There is a lock for the zoom feature. In comparison to Canon, Nikon, and Sigma lenses that I've used in the past, the zoom ring travel on this lens is more restricted. When the lens hood is coiled into the transport position, manually focusing the lens is an incredibly inconvenient process.

When I "drooled" over another model from a different manufacturer, I never would have imagined that I would end up purchasing this specific lens. Additionally, I had no intention of being given an order like a "pig in a poke" at the pickup location. The times, though, are.

The fact that a hood is included in the package is both practical and time saving because it eliminates the need to shop around for one. In general, the lens is compatible with all cameras and takes photographs that are superior to those taken with the regular lens.

The lens is versatile enough to serve as a staff member for photographing in regular situations. An excellent replacement for the lenses that come with a kit that is reasonably priced. It is recommended that you purchase the Nikkor 17-55 if you have the funds available. Better still, go full frame. Has pros: 1) Aperture 2) Image stabilizer 3) A satisfactory degree of sharpness emanating from an open hole 4) The crop has a helpful variety of focus lengths to choose from. Got cons: 1) When…

This Tamron 2.8 was my trade-in for the Nikkor 18-105. Overall, this lens gives off excellent, sharp images at 2.8. The image is neat and appealing. I particularly like Ka Razor's studio photography, especially at aperture 5.6. I won't talk about the hares because XA claims I never kept an eye out for them and I didn't catch any. The focus prowls in the dark for reporting, slowly. In summary, the lens is excellent for the price. It makes me think of the Nikkor 24-85 (2.8-4) lens. The tight zoom

I pair this lens with a Sigma 18-250 that has a stub extension and use it on a Nikon D90. Naturally, the autofocus on a Tamron is more sluggish. However, using aperture 2.8 in conjunction with the stub does wonders! The very latest! After taking several classes in photography, I was able to recognize that the lens has a significant back focus. Adjustment is only feasible in Hong Kong (I live in St. Petersburg), so I will send it with a friend who lives there for adjustment, and then I will let…

When I tested these three lenses for front and back focus on a target that is often found on the internet, I discovered that the autofocus function worked in some unusual way on all three lenses, despite coming from three separate batches. I'll explain the circumstances under which I made the observation below. Nikon D7000, aim 50-60 cm. The aperture was set to its widest possible opening, and the focal length was set to 50. I bring an object in the distance out of focus, then I center my…

It exceeded my expectations by a factor of two and I took it together with the Nikon D7000. I got the exact image I was looking for from the cadaver. The clarity and resolution of the native Nikkor 18-105 are not even close. A good aperture enables high-quality photography in practically any circumstance. Autofocus is foolish, certainly, but what are you expecting for your money? And in most circumstances, it's not a deal-breaker for me. Of course, a substantial majority of marriages lack…

On the carcass of the D7000, I used it as a reportage lens. If certain details are taken into mind while dealing with it, it performs extremely well in its assigned role. 1. If you want your photo to be crisp, you should not open the aperture more than 3.5 stops. It is preferable to cover up to 5.6. However, if you need to arrange multiple persons in the frame, more than 5.6, you should not utilize it for reporting purposes because it has a lower framing ratio. 2. The stabilizer devours…

An excellent optic for capturing its qualities. The only thing I'd change is to have faster autofocus like a sigma equivalent. But the saddest part is that marriage rates are so high. The first one I bought was not tested for depth of field or front to back focus. that I deeply regret having done. I gave it to the service, and they confirmed that it has excellent back focus. I tried to return it for a different one, but it wasn't accepted. Only one of the four copies I examined in the shop…

On the D90, where I work, I was able to afford it. Since I won't be using it myself, all I can do is express my initial reactions. At a pleasing 2.8, the focus is razor-sharp. Even though a stabilizer isn't strictly necessary at that focal length, I feel much better about the $1420 I spent on a lens with a 14200 stub. The price is noted as $22022, which is a large sum. If you had to choose between a sigma, a tokina, and a tamron 17-50 2.8, go with the tamron, but handle it with care.

three lenses were tried out in the store. The other two turned out to be fairly good, while one had a front focus. A pretty good lens for $16,000 (cost of the version without VC). 20222 rubles. Since the absence of a stub is not at all important at focal lengths of 17–50mm, I don't think it makes sense to get an image stabilized version. More like a marketing gimmick from Tamron. You can purchase a Tokina AT-X 165 f/2.8 Pro DX for the same amount of money. The Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 is…

Approximately two and a half years ago, I began using this lens. I think it's fair to say that this was an extremely fruitful acquisition. He is almost ideal in every way. The one area in which it falls short of its equivalent from Sigma is in terms of how sharp it is at the long end when the aperture is wide open. This is not a deal breaker for me because I only use the lens for portraits at a focal length of 50 millimeters and an aperture of 2.8, and in those situations, having an excessive…

Typical glass for daily use permits for my 24MP d7100. Both excellent sharpness and a lack of pattern define this lens. That instance, after removing a razor-sharp shot that was perfectly placed and deleted, I realize that something is lacking; it's like watching a movie without popcorn. He disguised himself as a staff member for fifty dollars rather than the old, dead Tamron. Constant overexposure in bright conditions; mode or freeze is unimportant; there is always no sky. I initially believed

You cannot purchase a regular Nikon standard zoom for that amount of money since it would smell of such an aperture. What about an analog camera with similar specs? Between this "Tampon" and Tokina, a decision was made. Tokina was impressed by the metal structure and alarmed by its sharpness and spooky behavior in the backlight. The tampon, while having more balanced qualities, will not last as long. Additionally, the vibration compensation is not an added feature. I'm just getting started, so