Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Janusz ᠌ photo
1 Level
345 Review
0 Karma

Review on Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002 by Wiktor Janusz ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, I'm glad I purchased it.

I purchased a kit with 5dm2 and have been using it for more than two years. The first impressions are good. When I read reviews, I saw that many mention how the stub makes up for f/4. You are partially correct; this is true when photographing static scenes. If the first dance of the young is going to take place in a typical, large restaurant, like Paradise Hall on Domodevskaya (which has a capacity of more than 500 people), you will need to increase the ISO and decrease the shutter speed because there will be a commotion in the spots where the flash isn't present. Here, a 24-70 with a 2.8 hole determines more, but it's worthwhile. Working out a DD lens is a thing that can be done (yeah, it's not only for cameras). Thus, 16-35 and 17-40 are both darker at f/4 for the same reason. Therefore, for the same values, 24-105 is darker than 24-70. They are exactly the same in 24-105 dd as they are in 17-40; they are equally black and cast shadows and light in the same way. Rendering is not particularly crucial; for instance, if you film a scene in which one portion of an object is in the shade and the other is illuminated by the sun, you will receive a total failure in both instances. Rav will assist us in this situation, defuse the tension, and resemble 24-70, but what if we convert 24-70 to Rav correctly? With the 24-105, which is a budget option, I photographed several weddings. I used it most frequently indoors and during cloudy conditions, when the angle and maximum zoom were required. It holds lighting flawlessly; the only criticism is that it is really unnoticeable HA. Acceptable distortion; unlike the 24-70, which has a more barrel-shaped distortion. BB rarely becomes blue. Due to the hole, the tenacious AF is not as quick when used with m2, however I have found that it focuses slightly more quickly on m3. Conclusion: Considering the cost, his drawing is stylish. Because they employ shutter speeds of 1/30 or 1/50 and this is a drawing with halftones and smoother contrast, videographers will find it more appropriate. However, as a photographer, I would not suggest taking high-quality pictures on the street due to his dd.

Pros
  • Ideal for video, sharp, quiet, trustworthy, and lightweight.
Cons
  • calculating dd and aperture ratio.