Review on MICHELIN Primacy 4 215/55 R17 94V summer by Wiktor Getka ᠌

First off, the tires aren't loud—I didn't put "quiet" on purpose, but that's just because it's such a vague term. They are noticeably quieter than my regular car, a Euro 129 kama, that's for sure. It's also worth noting that the quality of the asphalt has an effect on the noise level; on coarse grained asphalt, all tires produce an unpleasant noise, while on smooth asphalt, the noise level decreases. If someone curses or praises the noise of his tires, it could signify that he is driving on regular or awful asphalt in principle (I have asphalt portions on the embankment when the euro oak kama became noticeably quieter). Second, they're really comfortable to ride and steer, much to my delight. They're not quite as plush as winter kontik 7s—those tend to be jelly:—but they're softer than the average euro kame. Thirdly, and least favorably, they buzz a bit (not as much as in the winter), but only minimally and not to the point of exerting any strain on the brain. - There was essentially no audible disturbance after 6 months. But here's the thing: I'm quite thorough, and yet my pals assure me that everything's OK and that I'm a complete dummy. Despite claims to the contrary in some comments, I don't think the tire will break or a hernia will climb on it unless it's subjected to some sort of external mechanical impact. It all comes down to the driver's approach and the condition of the roads. I've updated the review to reflect the season's findings; remember, water is of paramount importance. I rode purposefully through flooded puddles at regular flight speeds of 60-80 kilometers per hour and did not even notice. Guys, the kakulki flew with enormous force; I sensed the p * c was there; but, praise be, I stayed out of the wedge and witnessed the new protector in action. For the season (7t. K.), I don't see much wear (picture in the room), and another two or three rolls back steadily. 3. The wear resistance is average.